Crimes of the powerful

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/16

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 6:31 PM on 10/6/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

17 Terms

1
New cards

Who coined "white-collar crime" in 1939, and how did he define it?

  • Sutherland [AO1].

  • "A crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation." [AO1].


2
New cards

What is the difference between Occupational and Corporate crime?

  • Occupational: Stealing from the company for personal gain [AO1].

  • Corporate: Law-breaking for the company to boost profit [AO1]


3
New cards

What is Pearce’s Marxist concept of "mystification"?

  • Concept: The state hypes up street crime to make corporate crime look rare [AO1].

  • Function: Creates a false illusion that the law protects everyone equally [AO3].


4
New cards

How does Volkswagen (2015) prove Crimes Against Consumers?

  • Application: Used illegal "defeat device" software to cheat emissions tests [AO2].

  • Impact: Defrauded millions of buyers who thought they were buying eco-friendly cars [AO2].


5
New cards

How does Volkswagen (2015) prove Crimes Against the Environment?

  • Application: The software masked true pollution levels during tests [AO2].

  • Impact: Allowed cars to emit up to 40 times the legal limit of toxic gases into the atmosphere [AO2].


6
New cards
  • What case study proves Financial Corporate Crime, and what did they do?



  • Case Study: HSBC (2012) [AO2].

  • Details: Laundered $881 million for violent drug cartels [AO2].

  • Exam Link: Proves the massive scale of elite financial fraud [AO2]


7
New cards

What individual case study covers Occupational Crime and the Abuse of Trust?

  • Case Study: Dr Harold Shipman (2000) [AO2].

  • Details: A high-status GP who murdered 200+ patients and forged their wills for personal gain [AO2].


8
New cards
  • Who argues corporate crime is an "abuse of trust", and why does it cause invisibility?



  • Carrabine et al. [AO1].

  • Reason: High status gives elites a "license to practice," which automatically deflects suspicion [AO3].


9
New cards
  • What does "M" and "P" stand for in the M.P.C.D.U. invisibility mnemonic?



  • M – Media Bias: Uses sanitised language (e.g., "technical error" instead of fraud) [AO1].

  • P – Political Will: Politicians stay "tough on street crime" to win easy votes [AO1].


10
New cards

What does "C", "D", and "U" stand for in the M.P.C.D.U. invisibility mnemonic?

  • C – Complexity: Complex global finance outpaces police forensic tracking [AO1].

  • D – De-labelling: Offences are filtered out into civil fines rather than criminal courts [AO1].

  • U – Under-reporting: Victims are diffuse or unaware they are being defrauded [AO1].


11
New cards

What is "Partial Visibility", and what case study supports it?

  • Definition: Elite crime is leaking into the public eye due to technology [AO1].

  • Evidence: The Panama Papers and whistleblowers exposing global tax evasion [AO2].


12
New cards
  • How does Box (Marxist) explain corporate crime?



  • Theory: Criminogenic Capitalism demands infinite profit [AO1].

  • Mechanism: If legal paths are blocked, companies face strain and turn to illegal "innovation" [AO1].


13
New cards

What is the primary AO3 criticism of Box's Marxist/Strain explanation?

  • Criticism: It is economically deterministic [AO3].

  • Flaw: Cannot explain massive corporate/environmental crimes in historical communist states like Soviet Russia [AO3].


14
New cards
  • What is Nelken’s Interactionist concept of "de-labelling"?



  • Concept: Criminality is socially negotiated [AO1].

  • Mechanism: Elites hire expensive legal teams to redefine crimes as civil mistakes or technical errors [AO1].


15
New cards

What is the primary AO3 criticism of Nelken's Labelling explanation?

  • Criticism: It is too descriptive [AO3].

  • Flaw: Explains how companies avoid labels, but fails to explain why they chose to break the law in the first place [AO3].


16
New cards

How does Geis use Differential Association Theory to explain business crime?

  • Theory: Corporate crime is a learned subcultural behavior [AO1].

  • Finding: New executives joining firms with an established culture of price-fixing quickly adopted it to fit in [AO2].


17
New cards

What is the primary AO3 criticism of Geis's subcultural explanation?

  • Criticism: It ignores individual free will [AO3].

  • Flaw: It fails to explain why ethical whistleblowers choose to reject the corrupt culture and expose their bosses [AO3].