1/168
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Fundamental niche
All resources and abiotic requirements needed for survival of a species
Competition
Interactions between organisms over the same scarce resource
Negatively; overlap
Competition: Both organisms are _____ affected interaction; Intensity of competition depends on degree of niche _____
Gause’s experiment
Studied paramecium protozoans
Abundant growth
Gause’s experiment: Species reared alone= ____ ____
Reduced
Gause’s experiment: Species reared together= both populations _____
Extinct
Gause’s experiment: Eventually one species went _____ while the other persisted
Gause’s experiment
Conclusion: Two species that are competing for the exact same resource cannot stably coexist (one species will have a slight advantage and outcompete the other)
Hutchinson’s plankton paradox
Organisms coexisting while using the same resource (not outcompeting one another to extinction)
Multiple limiting factors
Hutchinson’s plankton paradox (why not outcompete): Different species of plankton have different limiting factors
Spatial variation
Hutchinson’s plankton paradox (why not outcompete): variation in depths, shore, patches of nutrients; see different species dominating different microhabitats
Temporal variation
Hutchinson’s plankton paradox (why not outcompete): Change in season, weather; while some decline others thrive
Hutchinson’s plankton paradox
Plankton are resource and niche partitioning
Tilman’s resource competition theory
Studied algae
Tilman’s resource competition theory
R* resource concentration where birth rate=death rate (varying concentrations of limiting nutrients)
Declines
Tilman’s resource competition theory: Below R* population _____
Grows
Tilman’s resource competition theory: Above R* population ____
Breakeven
R* is the ______ for resource availability (minimum requirement for survival)
Lower
Tilman’s resource competition theory: When two species are competing for the same limiting resource, those with a _____ R* will win (it can survive at resource levels lower than its competitor)
Yes
Is competition hard to prove in natural ecosystems?
Removal experiments
Testing for competition: Removal of suspected competitor
Increases
Removal experiments: If the remaining species ______ in abundance, competition was occurring
Enrichment experiments
Testing for competition: Add more of the suspected limiting resource
Increases
Enrichment experiments: If the target species _____, that suggests that there was competition for that resource
Niche partitioning
Development of specializations that reduce competition between species (to reduce competition)
Competition Lotka-Volterra model
Tracks interactions and population number fluctuations due to competition not predation
Isocline
Population size where species has a net population growth rate of zero
4
Competition Lotka-Volterra model: __ possible ways data can be arranged
Competitive exclusion
Competition Lotka-Volterra model: Isoclines do NOT cross, _____ _____ results
Top
Competition Lotka-Volterra model: Whichever isocline is on ___ drives the other to extinction
Unstable coexistence
Competition Lotka-Volterra model: Isoclines cross; outcome depends on initial abundance (whoever starts with more organisms will survive)
Stable coexistence
Competition Lotka-Volterra model: Isoclines cross; Each limits itself more than limits the other (if one species gets too abundant competition will decrease and reverse)
Size
Lotka-volterra competition model can predict the outcomes of competition if we know how the population ___ of the 2 species will change overtime
Hubbell
Who came up with the neutral theory
Neutral theory
All species in a community are ecologically equivalent in needs and abilities; differences in abundance and distribution arise from random chance
No
Is the neutral theory reliable?
Needs
Neutral theory critiques: Not all organisms have the same ____
Disturbance; demographic randomness
Which two random processes are possible in the neutral theory?
Niche theory
Species differ in traits and requirements; competition and specialization structure communities; predictable outcome=resource competition
Identical; long term
Neutral theory critiques: Assumes species are ____; Neutrality cannot explain ____ ____ coexistence when niches strongly diverge (evidence of niche partitioning
Intraspecific competition
Types of competition: Within a species (same species competing)
Interspecific competition
Type of competition: Between species (different species competing)
Intraspecific competition
Types of competition: Common in dense populations; drives natural selection
Interspecific competition
Types of competition: Occurs when niches overlap; can lead to competitive exclusion; can lead to niche partitioning
Intraspecific competition
Types of competition: Density-dependent effect; more intense as populations approach K (explains why growth slows)
Crowding factors
Survival and reproduction decrease as density increases
Scramble competition
Resources are depleted by collective use; can reduce survival for all (no one individual directly controls resource access; sharks feeding on schooling fish)
Contest competition
Individuals directly interact to secure resources; some will benefit while others are excluded
Territories
Contest competition: Defending patches guarantee food or guarantee mates
Dominance hierarchies
Contest competition: Compete for mates and food
Direct interference
Contest competition: Harassment or physical exclusion
Allelopathy
Organisms release biochemicals to inhibit growth, survival, or reproduction of neighbors; aggressive form of competition (black walnut; costal sage)
Interference
Allelopathy is a form of ______ competition
Predation
One organism consuming another
Herbivory
Plant/algae eaten by animals
Grazers
Herbivory: Remove part of many plants (cattle eating grass)
Browsers
Herbivory: Feeds on leaves/twigs of woody plants (deer)
Carnivory
Animals consuming other animals; excerpts effort in collection
Pursuit predators
Carnivory: Chase and capture prey
Ambush Predators
Carnivory: Lie in wait for unsuspecting prey
Gradient
Many species are intermediates between ambush and pursuit
Omnivory
Consumes both meat and plants (teeth dentition; gut length; multiple collection methods depending on diet)
Scavengers
Feed on organisms that are already dead
Subdivision of carnivory
Dependent on who killed the prey
Scavengers
Who is ecologically important for nutrient cycling
Prey is consumed incrementally while still alive (often don’t kill host [loose food, shelter, and next generation])
Parasitism
Parasitoids
Intermediate between predator and parasite; only larval stages is parasitic; adults lay eggs in or on host (larvae consume host from within
Gause
Who’s experiment: Didinum (predator) feeding on Paramecium (prey)
Without intervention
Gause’s Predator-prey system: Predator quickly overconsumes prey (prey crashes, predators starve; both go extinct)
With intervention
Gause’s Predator-prey system: Periodic reintroduction of prey (typical pred-prey cycle)
Gause
Who’s conclusion: Natural predator-prey interactions require mechanisms beyond simple predation (immigration)
Too large
Provide a refuge (Gause): Predators can’t find prey (predator extinction)
Just right
Provide a refuge (Gause): Some prey survive and repopulation (long term coexistence)
Huffaker
Who’s experiment: Two mite species on oranges. Predator: Typhlodromus, prey: Eotetranychus
Huffaker
More complex system (who): Added structures for hiding only smaller mites could cross (prey survived longer, oscillation occurs)
Huffaker
Environmental complexity can stabilize predator-prey interactions
Recovery time
Influence pred-prey stability: Reproductive rates of predators vs prey
Immigration
Influence pred-prey stability: Colonization from outside patches
Escapability/refuge
Influence pred-prey stability: Presence or absence
Prey defenses
Influence pred-prey stability: Behavioral, morphological, chemical
Multiple prey system
Predator can switch between prey species when one becomes scarce
Stable
Multiple-prey systems are more _____
Recover
When the predator switches prey species the first prey population can _____
Threshold of security
If prey falls below a certain abundance, predators stop focusing on them
Paine effect
Multi-prey systems: Removal of sea star (top predator); results in mussels monopolizing space leading to other species decline
Paine effect
Predators can increase diversity by suppressing dominant competitors
Brooks and Dodson
Multi-prey systems: Pond without fish= dominated by daphnia (efficient filter feeders, outcompete copepods) Pond with fish= mix of daphnia and copepods
Estes
Multi-prey systems: With sea otters= sea otters eat sea urchins, keeping population low (kelp, fish, seals, eagles); Without sea otters= only urchins (overpopulate, kelp destroyed, habitat loss)
Keystone species
A species whose impact on community structure is disproportionately large relative to its biomass
Multiple predator system
Predators may compete for shared prey; can result in predation of one predator on the other; mathematically chaotic; most stable
Numerical response
Predator response to prey density: Change in the number of predators as prey density changes
More; increased
Numerical response: High prey density= ____ food= ____ survival
Functional response (behavioral)
Predator response to prey density: Changing in feeding rate as prey density changes (more frequent encounters with prey; reduced search time; plateau when preds are satiated)
Type I
Functional response: Linear; straight line, increasing until plateau; Predator consumes prey at a constant rate until satiated (no handling or search limitation)
Type II
Functional response: Hyperbolic (most common in nature); rapid rise, levels off gradually; predators spend increasing time handling prey as density rises; eventually limited by digestion or prey processing time
Type III
Functional response: Sigmoidal (switching and learning); S shaped curve; at low prey density predators may ignore rare prey; as prey becomes more abundant, predators switch to or learn to target them
Drives; community; easy
Predation _____ evolution; shapes ______ dynamics; predators usually target _____ prey
Prey
Predator populations are often limited by ____
Evolutionary arms race
Prey is constantly evolving to avoid predation; Predators are constantly evolving to better get/eat prey
Prey
Selective pressure on _____: camouflage, spines, toxicity, escape, morphological traits (horns, speed)