1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Differential association
theory (DAT):1
Offending is learnt through
socialisation into the pro-
criminal norms and values of
a social group.
Differential association
theory (DAT):2
All attitudes and behaviours
are learnt through
association with other
people, so offending is more
likely to occur when a social
group values deviant
behaviour.
P1
Strength = research support
E1
Farrington et al. (2006):
longitudinal study, boys aged 8-
50, family criminality most
important risk factor for later
offending
C1
However, correlational evidence;
family criminality could be
genetic factor
S
So, DAT is difficult to evidence
P2
Limitation = untestable
E2.1
Difficult to operationalise pro-
criminal attitudes; can’t
quantify/compare
E2.2
Without measurable variables,
DAT cannot make falsifiable
predictions
L2
So, DAT is impractical and
unscientific
P3
Strength = accounts for range
of crime
E3.1
Explains white-collar crime in
affluent social groups who
share attitudes
E3.2
Learn and justify
financial/corporate crimes
from professional networks
L3
So, DAT has explanatory power