1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
When do drug candidates fail
Step 1-2: Discovery and Development
What % of drugs are rejected at this stage
Around 70-75% of initial candidates are rejected
much cheaper to reject drugs at this stage
When do drug candidates fail
Step 3-4: Preclinical research
What percentage of drugs reach this stage?
~5-10% get through to this stage
When do drug candidates fail
Step 5-6: Clinical research trials
Very dew drugs get through into final stage 3 trials
When do drug candidates fail
Step 7: Stage 3 trials and FDA Drug Review
Rejection at this stage is very costly
The stages of drug development
•Step 1-2: Discovery and Development (~70% rejected)
•Step 3-4: Preclinical Research (~5-10% reach this stage)
•Step 5-6: Clinical Research trials (very few reach final stage 3 trials)
•Step 7: Stage 3 trials and FDA Drug Review
•Step 8: FDA Post-Market Drug Safety Monitoring
Why do drugs fail in clinical trials
1) Unavoidable failures:
• Efficacy and safety – primary reason for failure
2) Avoidable failures – poor planning
• Strategy – poor trial design
• Operational – no money
• Commercial – no market, competition
Primary reason for failure in drug trial
Efficacy and safety reasons
First major well documented drug failure in modern times + year
The Elixir Sulphonamide drug in 1937
How did the Elixir Sulphonamide drug failure occur + in what year
1937 Chief chemist dissolved the drug in diethylene glycol and added raspberry flavour.
– Over 100 died as a direct result of poisoning with diethylene glycol
– Chemist committed suicide while awaiting trial
What happened in response to the Elixir Sulphonamide drug failure
Congress passed the 1938 Food, drug and cosmetic act – required companies to perform animal safety tests on all new drugs
• Led to the empowerment of the FDA
Thalidomide scandal key dates and people
– Licensed in 1958 as a sedative and medication for morning sickness without being tested on pregnant women
– Birth defects first detected in 1961 by a midwife Pat Sparrow in a Sydney hospital (though Dr William McBride took the credit)
– German pediatrician Widukind Lenz proved the link to Thalidomide in 1961
Thalidomide scandal impact on foetus
More than 10,000 people effected by thalidomide ~40% died at birth
• Those that survived had limb, eye, urinary tract and heart defects, disfigurement, palsy, sensory impairment, skeletal defects
• The drug effected the fetus if taken between day 20-40 days after conception - severity and location of deformity was time dependent
Thalidomide scandal -changes to clinical practice
Changes to regulations for drug testing and clinical trials in many countries
– The Directive 65/65EEC1 in Europe
– Medicines Act in 1968 in the UK
– Kefauver-Harris Amendment (drug efficacy Amendment) 1962 in the US
• All of these made manufacturers provide stringent data and proof of drug safety before approval
• Made drug advertising disclose side effects (US)
The TGN1412 story
What is the drug for
TGN1412 (Theralizumab) - Promising CD28 super agonist
• Created by Thomas Hunig at University of Wurzburg and developed by TeGenero Immuno Therapeutics
– Designed to help immune system to treat rheumatoid arthritis and B cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
– The drug enhanced regulatory T cell activity
The TGN1412 story
First human trial for the drug
2006: eight volunteers (6 receiving the drug and 2 the placebo)
Patients started to suffer from severe headaches, muscle pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, severe fever, rash and rigors.
• After 4 hours patients suffered hypotension, tachycardia and onset of respiratory failure
The volunteers all suffered a severe ’cytokine storm’
The TGN1412 story
Why did humans have different response to drug than rats and macaques
• Rats did produce large numbers of T cells but not the cytokines
• The macaque CD28 differs by 4 AAs, including critically in the super antagonistic antiCD28 binding domain.
• Humans also have co-stimulatory molecules in endothelia cells that synergized with CD28 costimulation – massive cytokine response
• Human cells have minimal CD33 which downregulate these pathways while monkeys have high levels
The TGN1412 story
Impact on future clinical trials
22 recommended changes to Clinical trials subsequently:
• Changes to calculations in starting point for dosing
• More scrutiny to novel agents and access to independent opinion
• New guidelines for trials of drugs that have never been tested in humans.
• Make sure animal model is relevant
• Sequential clinical testing – don’t give to all participants at same time- monitor for ill effects after each one.
• Give drugs via slow infusion
• Accreditation scheme for companies running Phase 1 trials
• Improved transparency with clinical trial reports made publicly available.
Salk polio vaccine
Killed vaccine
• In 1953 Jonas Salk produced first successful polio vaccine from formaldehyde killed virus
• 1954 tested on 1.6 million children in Canada, Finland and USA
• Licensed in 1957
• Cases of polio declined from 58,000 to just 161 in the US by 1961
Sabin polio vaccine
1954 developed oral attenuated vax from mutant strains of polio
Tested on prisoners first - proved safety
Unable to do trial in USA - went to USSR in 1959
1960 approved to do trials in US and vax approved
The cutter incident
1954 production began
Cases of paralytic polio started to be reported after vaccination - all from the Cutter Laboratories
Cutter Laboratories were recalled.
• 380,000 doses had already been given. 260 cases of polio were reported from this vaccine, 192 with paralyses and 10 deaths.
• Issue was with poor filtration allowing clumps of virus that protected virions against killing and poor inactivation
The Cutter incident - Aftermath
– The attenuated Sabin vaccine was chosen over the killed Salk vax
– Although the Cutter Incident damaged the reputation of Salk’s vaccine, the Sabin vaccine had major advantages
– Led to improvements in government oversight of testing
Sabin vaccine major advantages over Salk vax
1) It was given orally, easy to administer and designed to mimic the natural route of infection via the intestine
2) It did not require cold chain storage so ideal for developing nations
3) The efficacy was similar but it provided life long immunity without the need for booster shots.
Rare adverse side effect of oral attenuated polio vax
Vaccine- associated paralytic polio (VAPP)
• Occurs in around 1:1 million vaccinations
• 1 case in the US, several in India
• It can lead to cVDPV and outbreaks of polio in regions where the vaccine uptake is low
• Is of higher risk of happening in people with immunodeficiencies
Vaccine- associated paralytic polio (VAPP) occurs from which vax and in what frequency
rare adverse effect of the oral attenuated polio vaccine (Sabin)
• Occurs in around 1:1 million vaccinations
The Dengvaxia controversy against Dengue infection
April 2016 the Phillipines launched the first vaccination program using Dengavaxia
– In November 2017 the company released statement saying that the vaccine should NOT be used in people
who had not had a prior Dengue infection.
– The Philippine Government then suspended vaccination
– Could lead to antibody enhancement and much more dangerous dengue hemorrhagic fever
– 3 children died of dengue after the vax
CSL COVID-19 vaccine
How it worked
Used a novel Molecular clamp mechanism
University of Queensland developed method to use a modified gp41 protein from HIV to ‘clamp’ the virus Spike
protein into the pre bound form making it easier to target with a vaccine
CSL COVID-19 vaccine
What went wrong
Vax was shown to be safe and stimulated strong neutralizing antibodies to SARS-cov-2
• However, in the first human all of the phase 1 participants also generated a weak antibody response to the GP41 HIV fragments
• While there was never any chance of an HIV infection the association with HIV was enough to terminate the project
Example of a vaccine will likely never be available due to lack of commercial interest
The Ross River virus vaccine against the commonest arbovirus infection in Australia
Who produced the first polio vaccine to be used commercially in the US?
A. John Enders
B. Jonas Salk
C. John Kolmer
D. Albert Sabin
B. Jonas Salk
TGN1412 was a?
A. Sulfonimide drug
B. An analgesic
C. A teratogenic degrader of transcription factors
D. A CD28 Super agonist
D. A CD28 Super agonist
The Elixir sulfanimide drug caused fatalities because?
A. It led to increased clotting in some patients
B. The active ingredient dose was too concentrated
C. It was dissolved in diethylene glycol to improve commercial sales
D. It was contaminated with a drug resistant enterococcus
C. It was dissolved in diethylene glycol to improve commercial sales