1/61
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What are the four categories that the aims of punishment can be put into?
Deterrence
Incapacitation
Rehabilitation
Retribution
What is Deterrence?
Primary aim is to discourage the general population from engaging in criminal behaviour by using the punished individuals as an example
focuses on discouraging the punished individual from committing future crimes by making the punishment unpleasant enough to deter them personally
What is Incapacitation?
To protect society from the offender by physically removing them from the community
What is Rehabilitation?
Aims to reform and reintegrate the offender into society as a law-abiding citizen
What is Retribution?
Based on the concept of ‘pay back’ - idea that the punishment should be proportionate to the severity of the crime committed
expressed in religious texts such as the Bible and Qur’an as ‘an eye for an eye’
What do Functionalists suggest as the role of punishment?
Durkheim - punishment as a necessary and functional purpose (VOS)
reminds members of societal values
maintains social order
preserves social solidarity
According to Durkheim, what is the role of punishment in an Traditional Society?
Retributive Justice
little difference and diversity between individuals = strong collective conscious is produced: “social mores”
when collective conscience is offended, vengeful passion motivates the punishment - expressive: means of expressing outrage
Visible punishment is vital in protecting these social mores
According to Durkheim, what is the role of punishment in an Modern Society?
Restitutive Justice
society is more specialised and individuals have different roles and skills (division of labour) - crime damages this inter-dependence of one person on another
aim is to restore things to how they were before the offence was committed - to restore society’s equilibrium (balance)
however, punishment still has an expressive element
Usefulness of Durkheim’s perspective on Punishment
laid a foundation for understanding the role of punishment in society
his theories oversimplify the complexities of social order, neglect power dynamics, assume shared values, and may not adequately consider to protection of individual rights
What do Marxists suggest as the role of punishment?
Althusser - Punishment is apart of the Repressive State Apparatus
way of physically controlling the working class and preventing them from challenging the power of the capitalist class
Thompson’s (Marxist Historian) example of the Repressive State Apparatus
18th Century - Punishment such as hanging and transportation to colonies was part of a “rule of terror” by those who owned land (bourgeoisie)
issued these punishments to poachers and those who stole from their lands
possible because imperial states like Britain had colonies all over the world to send criminals too (e.g. Australia)
criminals could work in these colonies producing more wealth for the imperial powers
According to Rusche and Kirchheimer, what is the nature of punishment regarding Economic Structures?
Nature of Punishment reflects the economic needs and power relations within a given society - Labour Market and Punishment
rise of capitalism and the development of a wage-based labour market - penal system underwent a transformation
contended that the capitalist system required a disciplined and flexible workforce
prisons based on timetables, isolation and accepting hierarchical discipline - all norms that operate in factories
Punishment reflects the needs of the production and the labour market rather than any notion of justice - punishments change from bodily harm to depriving people of freedom
Usefulness of the Marxist’s perspective on Punishment
Garland criticised Marxism - too focused on economic determinism: overlook a number of other factors that have influenced the changing nature of punishment such as ethnicity
Perspective does not sufficiently account for variations in legal systems, crime rates, and punishment practices across different capitalist societies - e.g. some capitalist countries still use punishments such as the death penalty where as others do not
What does Foucault suggest about the birth of prisons?
Claimed that there were two different types of power that have been developed through time
sovereign power
disciplinary power
According to Foucault what is Sovereign Power?
Pre-modern societies - monarch ruled and punished people’s bodies for crimes
crimes seen as personal acts against the monarch and so punishment was a reminder of the monarch’s power
punishment was a public spectacle such a public execution
According to Foucault what is Disciplinary Power?
Modern times - punishment is not just about exercising power over the body but also the mind
e.g. Panopticon Prison design
doesn’t think bodily punishments disappeared because society became more civilised - rather that surveillance became a more efficient “technology of power”: effective way of controlling people
What is the Panopticon Prison design?
A prison design where the guards can see into prison cells and thus prisoners, but the prisoners cannot see out to the guards
prisoners must assume they are being watched at all times and so consequently discipline themselves
Foucault - disciplinary power has dispersed to other institutions in societies like factories, workplaces, schools - indue conformity from the threat of being watched
Usefulness in Foucault’s Perspective on Punishment
Garland - criticises Foucault for neglecting the role of the state and legal institutions in shaping punishment
Goffman - critiques Foucault’s ideas about total institutions - emphasises the role of face-to-face interactions and the micro-level dynamics within institutions
What is Garland’s theory of Punishment and Prisons?
Claims to demonstrate how the state seeks to reassure the public that crime is under control
Penal Welfarism
Culture of Control
Popular Punitivism
Mass Incarnation
Transcarceration
What is Garland’s idea of Penal Welfarism?
Emphasises the historical shift from rehabilitative approaches to punitive measures in response to crime
Brief period of emphasis on rehabilitation and social welfare within the penal system
This has now changed to a culture of control
What is Garland’s idea of Culture of Control?
Shift away from earlier forms of social control
societies moved away from a focus on rehabilitation to a culture that priorities risk management, surveillance, and the containment of potential threats through various forms of control
What is Garland’s idea of Popular Punitivism?
Growing demand for harsher punitive measures in response to crime
public opinion influences political decisions leading to more punitive policies
What is Garland’s idea of Mass Incarceration?
Manifestation of the culture of popular punitivism
black Americans only make up 13% if the US population but 37% of the prison population
Result of a deliberate decision to impose whole groups of the population and indicates a move away from penal welfarism to ‘tough on crime’ punitive populism
‘war on drugs’ policy in the US led to a ‘limitless supply of arrestable and imprisonable offenders’
Downes - also has ideological function: prison system soaks up around 30-40% of the unemployment, making capitalism look more successful
What is Garland’s idea of Transcarceration?
Claim that many people live their lives in a ‘culture of control’
moving through systems like care to young offenders’ institutions, mental hospitals etc
Usefulness in Garland’s Perspective on Punishment
UK there has been a growth in ‘diversion’ policies - attempt to divert offenders away from prison: e.g. curfews, electronic tagging, ASBOs
These policies sometimes have the opposite effect and divert more young people into the criminal justice system: e.g. young person fails to meet the conditions of their ASBO - risk facing a custodial sentence
Too focused on Western experiences, may not adequately consider the global variations in penal practices and policies: e.g. Scandinavian Countries, penal welfarism is still dominant
What societies did Foucault locate?
Disciplinary Societies - characterised by the organisation of vast space of enclosure
individuals never stop passing from one closed environment to another
prison serves as the analogical model as all the other institutions are based on its design of the panopticon
Always the possibility of people in these institutions being watched leading to discipline themselves
According to Deleuze what societies do we now live in?
No longer live in this ‘disciplinary society’ but rather we have moved to a ‘society of control’ institutions have stopped exercising their power over us by enclosing us in one place
no longer restrained by enclosures structures - appear to be free, but we notice how it diffuses ‘responsibility’ throughout life
expected to be responsive to demands of work even away from the office - “freed” from the enclosed workspace, the demands of work come to pervade all of our time
What is a Synoptic Society according to Mathiesen?
Today’s media saturated society, the media, as well as allowing the few to see the many, allowing the many to see the few
‘everyone watches everybody’
What is the effects of a Synoptic Society according to Thompson?
Powerful groups are now scared of the media’s surveillance of them as damaging information about them might be revealed - form of social control over their behaviour
public monitor each other - warn others in an attempt to promote self-discipline
How does McCahill criticise the idea of an Synoptic Society?
Bottom up scrutiny might not always be able to reverse ‘hierarchies of surveillance’ as anti-terror laws, police powers etc have the ability to confiscate camera/phones etc
What is Surveillance Assemblages according to Haggerty and Ericson?
Surveillance technologies now involve manipulating virtual objects (digital data) in cyber space rather than physical bodies in physical space
technologies are now combined e.g. CCTV footage is combined with facial recognition software - ‘surveillant assemblages’: moving towards a world where data from technologies can be combined into a ‘data double’ of the individual
What is Risk Management according to Feeley and Simon?
“New technology of power” operates through CJS
focuses on groups
prevention
uses calculation of risk
e.g. Airport security checks on known offender “risk factors”: age, sex, religion, etc - gives each person a risk score
aim is to predict and prevent future offending
What is Risk Management according to Lyon?
Surveillance engages in ‘social sorting’ - people are categorised and treated differently according to the level of risk they pose
leads to ‘categorical suspicion’ - people placed under suspicion of wrongdoing by simply belonging to a social category or group
What is Risk Management lead to according to Lewis?
2010 of West Midlands Police - introduce new counter terror scheme in two Muslim suburbs of Birmingham
150 ANPR cameras in the area with the result of making the community feel like they were being placed under suspicion
What is the result of Labelling and Surveillance?
Acting on stereotypes - leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy
What is Labelling and Surveillance lead to according to Norris and Armstrong?
“massively disproportionate targeting” of young black males for no other reason that their membership of that particular social group when it comes to CCTV operator focus
judgement based on typification’s
result in self-fulfilling prophecy
Victim Patterns - Males
70% of homicide victims
Victim Patterns - Females
60% victims killed by partner/ex
31% intimate violence
most likely to be victimised by an acquaintance
10x more likely to have reported sexual assault
most likely to be killed by a friend or acquaintance
less likely to be overall victims of violence
more likely to experience repeat victimisation
Victim Patterns - Ethnic Minorities
Much more likely to be victims of hate crimes
Macpherson Enquiry - institutional discrimination
more likely to experience secondary victimisation
more likely to be young and unemployed
What do Positivist Victimologists focus on?
Focuses on individual factor which increases the rate of victimisation
What are Miers’ key ideas of Positivist Victimology?
Aims to identify the factors that reproduce patterns in victimisation
Focuses on interpersonal crimes of violence
Aims to identify victims who have contributed to their victimisation
According to Wolfgang, what is Victim Precipitation?
26% involved victim precipitation (victim triggered the events leading to the homicide: e.g. they used violence first)
often the case where the victim was male and perpetuator female
How does Brookman strengthen the Positivist Victimology approach?
Importance of victim-offender relationship
interpersonal victimisation
matter of chance of who becomes the victim
How is the Positivist Victimology approach criticised?
Ignores wider structural factors influencing victimisation: e.g. poverty & patriarchy
Victim blaming: Amir - 1 in 5 rapes are victim precipitated (no different from saying the victim derserved it)
Ignores situation where victims are unaware they are a victim
What do Critical Victimologists focus on?
Structural causations of victimisation
conflict: Marxists & Feminists
What are the key ideas of Critical Victimology?
Structural Factors - patriarchy and power: powerless groups at greater risk
State’s power to apply or deny the label of the victim - ‘victim’ is a social construct
According to Tombs and Whyte, what is Denial of Victim Status?
Workers die or are severely injured due to employers failing to abide by health and safety laws - normally explained away as ‘accidents’ or the fault of ‘accident prone workers’
not given victim status!
What is the Ideological Function of the Denial of Victim Status?
Concealing the true extent of victimisation and its real causes - hides the crime of the powerful and denies it powerless victims
hierarchy of victimisation - powerless are most likely to be victimised, yet least likely to be acknowledged by the state
How is the Critical Victimology approach strengthened?
Valuable in drawing attention to the way that ‘victim’ status is constructed by power and how this benefits the powerful at the expense of the powerless
How is the Critical Victimology approach criticises?
Disregards the role victims may play in bringing victimisation on themselves through their own choices or their own offending
How do Right Realists believe we should tackle crime?
Situational Crime Prevention
Environmental Crime Prevention
According to Right Realists, what is Situational Crime Prevention?
Strategies that increase the risk and reduce the opportunities for crime
based on rational choice theory - offenders weigh up risks and rewards
e.g. target-hardening, CCTV, alarms, surveillance, target removal, ‘designing out’ crime
New York - Situational Crime Prevention
Toilet sinks in New York bus terminals were changed to deter loitering, drug use and washing of clothes by the homeless
Strengths of Situational Crime Prevention
seen as practical and cost-effective for reducing specific types of crime
Criticisms of Situational Crime Prevention
doesn’t tackle root causes (poverty, inequality, socialisation)
criticised for causing displacement e.g. Spatial, Temporal
According to Right Realists, what is Environmental Crime Prevention?
Addresses the physical conditions that might encourage deviance - signs of disorder and to be tackled
signs of disorder encourage further crime as levels of informal social control break down
e.g. zero-tolerance policing, rapid repair of vandalism, and visible policing
New York - Environmental Crime Prevention
Subway trains were not allowed to depart before graffiti was removed
transit police began enforcing a ban on turnstile jumping at rail stations and there was a crackdown on ‘squeegee men’
Strengths of Environmental Crime Prevention
Evidence where policies in New York were successful - 50% reduction in homicides
Criticisms of Environmental Crime Prevention
accused of targeting marginalised groups (e.g. Operation Swamp in Brixton 1981) causing a breakdown in relations with the police
over-policing of minor offences
How do Left Realists believe we should tackle crime?
Social & Community Crime Prevention
aims to address social and economic causes of crime through long-term strategies such as improving education, housing, youth support, and employment
often involves early intervention and community partnerships and collaboration
The Perry Pre-School Project - Social & Community Crime Prevention
well-qualified teachers (master degrees)
good student, teacher ratio
maths, literacy
control group - 50% lower crime rate
Those who attended the Perry Pre-School projects when research in adulthood showed: fewer arrests, higher levels of education and better employment outcomes
Criticisms of Social & Community Crime Prevention
solutions tend to be expensive and long-term - the positive effects may not be seen for years