1/60
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Individual Differences
Variations in language learners
Early words
Referential —------------------- expressive
Referential - Using language primarily to label and name objects and people in the environment
Expressive - more focused on pragmatics, Using language primarily for social interaction, expressing feelings, personal needs, and routines.
Individual Differences
Variations in language learners
Language use
Code oriented —------------------- Message oriented
Code oriented - tend to label and repeat/practice the production of the language - focus on how well they are saying the code of language
Message oriented - interested in how they can use language to manipulate social situation
Individual Differences
Variations in language learners
Speech
Analytic —------------------------ Holistic
Analytic - carefully produce single words
Holistic - speech productions tend to be more variable
Individual Differences
Variations in language learners
Early “sentences”
Nominal combos —----------------------- Pronominal combos
Nominal combos - “daddy go, doggy bark” - specific label for a thing
Pronominal combos - combinations that use pronouns (this, that, those, and personal pronouns) or less specific labels
Individual Differences
Variations in language learners
rate?
Early talkers —----------------------------- Late talkers
Rate - timing of vocabulary spurt
Early talkers - vocabulary spurt happens before a year and a half
Late talkers - vocabulary spurt happens 24-30 months
other considerations for individual variance
→ Interactive style
Assertive / passive
Initiator / responder
→ Amount of talking
Self-talk / audience
→ Interests
***Position on one does not equal position on another
Contributing Factors to language variance:
Within child differences
Perseverance, curiosity, sociability, independence, cognitive style
Environment
bidirectional
Gender
boys and girls learn language differently because you learn what you experience
Nature of language
languages like korean and japanese are structured differently, they use verbs at end - we tend to learn what we hear first and last - english tends to use nouns in the beginning and end of sentences
late talkers
**note for implications for assessment
Usually defined as children who have an expressive vocabulary at 20 months of age have 50 or few words
About half spontaneously resolve
Implications for assessment
Individual differences and diversity are present in every person, disability or not
SYNTAXUALIZATION & GRAMMATICAL MORPHOLOGY:
Early language development is about lexical and relational semantics
Form follows function
Universal similarities in meanings
Assumes language is organized by content
Meaning is the key to discovering form
Utterance development:
Length and complexity
1 word → SSWU → 2&3 word phrases (“combos/fragments”)
Syntaxualization
period where young children's language begins to be organized by grammar (syntax) rather than meaning
In utterances from children that indicate that they are adhering to conventional syntax to organize their output
Evidence of syntaxualization (the process of syntactic development)
pronoun case → Nominative vs accusative
subject -verb agreement “I walk” vs “he walks”
Passive: “I read the book” vs “the book was read by me”
Nominative | Accusative |
I | me |
they | them |
he | him |
she | her |
Analyzing Syntactic Development
in this order:
lexicon
grammatical morphemes
sentence pattern
Lexicon
Locatives
Modals
Negatives
Grammatical morphemes
Free and bound morphemes → “box” - “boxes” (= boxness + plurality)
Free can stand on its own (every root word)
Bound are units of meaning that have to be attached to another morpheme to express its meaning
Sentence pattern (structure/complexity)
Morphological development
Characteristics of grammatical morphemes
Characteristics of grammatical morphemes
Syntactic functions
Low perceptual salience
Low phonetic substance
Sentence internal
Meanings are often already expressed by word order
High frequency
obligatory contexts
specific situation or linguistic framework where a fluent speaker is required to use a particular rule, form, or grammatical feature for the output to make sense or be grammatically correct
sets stage for how we count errors
Morphological development
Order of mastery: based on the words of Rodger Brown!!!
Used 90% of the time (obligatory contexts)
Keep in mind: time from first appearance to mastery and variety of learning curves
Morphological development
Developmental points of interest
Considerable time lapse between first appearance and eventual mastery
Variety of learning curves between morphemes
Frequent over-regularization - adding the form to an already marker irregular form - “feets” - “we camed home” → THIS IS EVIDENCE OF RULE GOVERNED-NESS!!!
Look for productivity
Inflections appear first in the most familiar (oldest) semantic contexts
Some grammatical morphemes actually emerge at the same time
Morphological development
MLU: Mean Length of Utterance
Basic steps?
Calculated in words or morphemes (usually morphemes)
Indicated length of utterance
For young children it will also capture complexity of utterances
Must use convention
MLU Basic Steps:
Segment utterances
Mark mazes
include/exclude utterances
Count free and bound morphemes in each utterance
Total morphemes/total utterances = MLU
Compare to robert brown stages
Predict age
Determine (in)consistencies for stages
Roger Browon Grammatical Morpheme order:
ing progressive |
In, on |
-s plural |
Irregular past tense |
Possessive -s |
Uncontracted copula |
Articles: a, the |
Past tense: -ed |
3rd person -s |
3rd person irregular (has, done) |
Uncontracted BE auxiliary |
Contractible copula |
Contractible auxiliary |
Grammatical Morpheme | Notes | Examples |
ing progressive | Earliest with durative & non completive verbs | Me playing Mommy eating |
In, on | In box On table | |
-s plural | Cats Bears | |
Irregular past tense | Early aspect meaning for completives, nondurative actions and events | I found Truck broke Baby fell |
Possessive -s | Mommy’s hat Grandpa’s car | |
Uncontracted copula | I am hot. Mommy is mad? | |
Articles: a, the | A big, brown cow. The dog. | |
Past tense: -ed | Skipped Walked Talked | |
3rd person -s | Baby sits He sings | |
3rd person irregular (has, done) | 1st person: I have a cup 2nd person: you have a cup She has a cup | |
Uncontracted BE auxiliary | “Helping verb” | He is helping me. I am stirring. |
Contractible copula | I’m hot You’re nice It’s good We’re happy They’re sad Everyone’s home | |
Contractible auxiliary | “Helping verb” | He’s helping me I’m stirring |
Morphological development
Developmental points of interest
Considerable time lapse between first appearance and eventual mastery, Look for productivity
Variety of learning curves between morphemes
Frequent over-regularization - adding the form to an already marker irregular form - “feets” - “we camed home” → THIS IS EVIDENCE OF RULE GOVERNED-NESS!!!
Inflections appear first in the most familiar (oldest) semantic contexts
Some grammatical morphemes actually emerge at the same time
Sentence Structure:
At the most basic level, a sentence is comprised of a subject and a predicate (aka “clause” usually a noun phrase and a verb phrase)
Dogs eat → (NP, VP)
My dogs eat → (NP, VP)
My brown dogs eat rotten bones → (NP, VP)
Clausal Structure:
Clause = subject + predicate
Subject:
Usually a noun phrase or a pronoun
The subject is the "who" or "what" that the sentence is about, or the entity performing the action.
Predicate: (comment about the subject)
A verb phrase (can contain noun phrase)
the "telling" part that states what the subject is, what the subject is doing, or what is happening to the subject.
My two big, brown young dogs from my grandmother are slowly eating rotten old bones near the trash can behind the fast food restaurant
Green = subject, Red = predicate
Elements of a noun phrase:
Initiator
Determinor
Adjectives
Noun
(post) determiners
Elements of a verb phrase:
Modal auxiliary - a helping verb that expresses the speaker's attitude toward an action or event, such as possibility, ability, permission, necessity, or obligation. - can, could, may, might, must, shall, should, will, and would
Perfective auxiliary - helping verb that is used with a main verb to indicate that an action has been completed or is viewed as completed. - Has, Have, Had
Verb: to be
Negative - expresses denial, refusal (not, no, never, don’t, can’t, won’t, didn't)
Passive - “thrown, chased, eaten, washed”
Verb
Prepositional phrase, noun phrase, noun complement, adverbial phrase
Two types of clauses:
“Independent” clause
“Main”
Can stand alone
Expresses the primary idea of the sentence
“My dog eats rotten bones”, “the cat sleeps on the rug.”, “The candy bar was delicious”, “the parrot squawked”, “the pirate danced a jig.”
“Dependent” clause
“Subordinate”
Cannot stand alone unless it is modified
Expresses the secondary idea of the sentence
“My dog eats rotten bones because he is hungry.” , “The cat slept on the rug while the rain poured.”
Simple sentence:
Complete sentence
one, independent clause
“one subject and one predicate”
Fragments:
NP or VP (aka phrases)
Ellipsis/Elliptical utterances:
directives?
Ellipsis/Elliptical utterances: previously stated (or contextually understood) information is not repeated, the part that is omitted has already been established
Examples (these are not fragments!!):
E: Tell me who stole your bike
C: Steven
C: I want to go to the store
C: No, I want to go to the park
Directives (commands) → (set up situations for ellipsis to be made)
Stated directly to the person
The subject (you) is redundant info
“Give me that crayon!”
Analyzing simple sentences:
ID the subject (topic)
ID the predicate
- Find the main verb: “I want pancakes
- ID any auxiliary verbs: “I may want pancakes”
- ID verb complex: “I may not want to eat pancakes”
- ID VP: “I may not want to eat pancakes”
Analyze the NPs
- May be subject and/or part of the VP
- elaborated?
Copulas “be”
present/past
singular/plural
“I am big. I was cold. He is hungry. They are hungry”
different from auxiliaries!!
Auxiliaries “to be”
present/past
singular/plural
I am eating. I was eating. You are eating. They are eating. They were eating.”
different from copulas!!
Infinitives
Not main verb, another verb that is not inflected “to eat” in “I want to eat pancakes”
“I am to play here. He said to eat it on the table”
Finite verbs
In english we mark tense and number with inflections on verbs:
“Today I walk. Yesterday I walked.”
“He sleeps. One cat sleeps. We sleep. Three cats sleep.”
Non-finite verb adjectivals:
“Ed” or “ing”
“The tired cats slept all morning. Creamed corn is my favorite vegetable. My hiking boots are old.”
they are different form gerunds because they are adjectives
Gerunds
“Ing”
“Hiking is my favorite sport. We will go canoeing this summer. She is going shopping this afternoon.”
different from non-finite verb adjectivals because they are nouns
3 ways “ing” works (functions)
main verb: progressive → “He is bowling well tonight.”
noun: gerund → “He loves bowling.”
verbal adjectival → “His bowling shirt is ugly”
Structural Development
Children's utterances grow in…
Length (number of words)
Complexity → NP (elaborated), VP(elaborated), Sentence pattern (simple, complex, expanded
Expanded Sentences
Expanded simple sentences:
More than one clause
But not yer complex sentence structure
Compound (coordinated) and conjoined
Compound sentence (“coordination”)
Contains 2 or more clauses within its structural framework (aka coordination)
Simplest way to combine 2 clauses “propositions” into a longer sentence (and, so, but, or)
My dog eats rotten bones and my hamster runs on its wheel
My dog eats rotten bones and it runs in the park
Sally wanted to go but her mom objected
Discourse:
T-units (c-units)
When 2 coordinate clauses share a subject…
Independent clause and all associated dependent clauses
“And…” “and then…” “but…” → discourse cohesion
Discourse cohesion - result in single independent clauses with repetitive coordinating conjunctions maxed if subjects of the clauses are different or stated
But sometimes the subjects are the same
When 2 coordinate clauses share a subject:
The subject may be deleted: “my dog eats rotten bones and my dog runs in the park
When a coordinating conjunction links two independent clauses in which the subject is shared (and NOT restated), it is 1 T unit.
Conjoined sentence
One subject with multiple predicates (VP): “she loves shopping but hates scrubbing toilets
Repetitions of the subject can be elliptical omitted
Segmentation in language samples
“They got in their truck and they started down the mountain”
Complex Sentences
Contained at least one independent clause and at least one dependent clause within its structural framework
Children start making complex sentences at 2 ½ to 3 years old
subordination, complementation, relativization,
Subordination - [ADV] - adverbial clause
One clause is subordinate to (or dependent on) the main clause. Joining an independent clause with a dependent clause
Requires a subordinating conjunction: because, if, when, until, as soon as, while SO, whether, although, since, etc.
Conditionality: unless, even though, although, etc.
As long as we are sitting here, we might as well eat
We should buy some bananas, if we need to run to the store.
Supposing that the weather holds, a picnic would be fine
Cause or reason: because, since, for, etc.
Time: before, after, since, until, while, etc.
Comparison: like, as if, as though, etc.
Place: where, wherever, etc.
Purpose: in order to, so as to, etc,
Helpful hint for “SO”
“So” can be used to coordinate or subordinate → figure out the logic behind the sentence
My dog eats rotten bones so dont smell his breath.
My dog eats rotten bones so (that) his teeth would be sharp.
Complementation [NOM] - nominal clause
One proposition is used to fill an empty part of another
Main clause often has a verb of: Cognition or communication
Complete a thought or express an attitude, belief or feeling. (sometimes called “complements”)
Easy to identify:
Introduced by pronounce: that, how, where, whether, whoever, what
I know “(something -clause)”
He wanted “(something -clause)”
She thought, “(something -clause)”
He said, “(something -clause)”
Relativization [REL] - Relative clause
types?
One proposition is attached to another preposition in order to modify or qualify it (adds more information, more precision)
2 types:
objective relative clause → “ I heard the bird that was in the tree”
Subjective relative clause → “the boy who was hungry ate dinner
Subjective relative clause: a clause that modifies the subject of the sentence
A dog that was hiding under the house ate rotten bones → the dog ate rotten bones
The cookies (that) mom baked were the best in the whole world → the cookies were the best in the whole world (the main clause)
Objective relative clause: a clause that modifies the object of the sentence
My dog ate rotten bones (that) he found in the trash
Language sample coding: [REL] - “Relative clause”
Give more information about either the subject or the object of the main clause
Often introduced with relative pronouns: that, who, whose. In which, whom, etc.
This code can be used for both subjective and objective relative clauses
May look like [NOM] but add precision to object or subject of MC instead of completing an idea that was opened
THEORY OF MIND AND LANGUAGE
Tasks
False-belief task
Child does not understand that someone may know what they know
Appearance-reality task
One object that looks like something else
Sponges that looks like rocks, etc.
Unexpected results task
THEORY OF MIND AND LANGUAGE
Developmental Sequence
First order
Contents of another's mind (4 years)
Second order
Beliefs re-beliefs or intentions (6-8 years)
THEORY OF MIND AND LANGUAGE
mental state terms and types?
Mental state terms - words that describe states of being/cognitive processes/awareness
Desire terms
Want, wish, etc. → come in early
Belief terms
Think, know, etc.
THEORY OF MIND AND LANGUAGE:
Importance of joint attention
Shows awareness of another’s mind
Important for maturing language (deception, humor, sarcasm)
THEORY OF MIND AND LANGUAGE
Communication uses
“Convery info among individuals”
What we say to whom, when, and why (pragmatics)
disorders of communication → ASD and SLI
Derivational Morphemes
Prefixes and suffixes
meaningfulness continues to develop through these - allows us to modify words and its meanings
No ages and stages
Why not?
Increased variance
Birth to 40 months
Afterwards:
→ experiential diversity
→ educational practices
→ SES and cultural expectations
Higher Order Semantics
about increasing levels of abstraction and reasoning
Definitions
Synonyms
Semantic absurdities → “The skier descended to the top of the mountain”
Humor
Figurative language (literal and non literal) → idioms, sarcasm
Higher Order Semantics: Definitions
“Meta skill”
Requirements:
Superordinate terms
Disembedded knowledge
Categorization of semantic features
Understanding of genre
Developmental sequence:
Young children give definitions that are prompted by the object or activity associated with the word (or the word itself) (“forrest” → 4 or sleep?) (island → eye? “We went to an island”
Later: more universal/generic info
information offered by young children is often more relevant to the object or activity denoted by the word than to the meaning of the word itself.
information offered by older children and adults is more likely to be universal and criterial (information offered by children is typically personal and incidental)
form becomes a more conventional -superordinate and restrictive complement. “An island is a body of land surrounded by water.”
Higher Order Semantics:
Synonyms and antonyms
require:
recognition of critical semantic features/attributes
retrieval of a semantically similar or dissimilar lexical item
development of pragmatic abilities is dependent upon
the development of all other language subsystems***
Contextually dependent
Schemes and scripts
Pragmatics
Utterance Level
i. Frames (communicative intent)
Types:
persuade, deceive, test, negotiate, argue, fantasize, play, entertain, etc.
Early childhood: play/fantasy, humor, deception, argument
ii. Direct & indirect speech acts (politeness)
Summary: speakers modify their utterances according to their communicative goals
Pragmatics
discourse level
Conversational discourse
Grice’s Conversational Postulates (rules) → quantity, quality, relation, manner
• Conversational Repairs
• Scripts
Narrative discourse
Pragmatics
Social and cultural conventions
registers are based on:
dialects are based on:
Language is an arbitrary, standardized, conventionalized set of symbols and rules about combining phonemes into morphemes and words into sentences for the purpose of communication
Linguistic Chauvinism (ethnocentrism)
Registers → volitional, within speaker differences
registers:
Early developing abilities
Develop throughout the school years (and hopefully longer)
??what will prerequisite communication abilities will this require? → syntactic abilities, semantic abilities, contextual awareness, practice
Dialects: (across speakers)
Regional, SES, Racial, Gender

Metalinguistics
“The use of language knowledge to make decisions about and to discuss processes of language”
using language to talk about language
“The child focuses on and reflects on language as a decontextualized object” - AvK
Metalinguistic parts
Linguistic intuition (implicit knowledge)
Implicit
Acceptability of communications
Assess: judgements of grammatical acceptability
Grammaticality judgment
Developmental trajectory
Early grammaticality judgments based on content
Gradual development
meta-awareness acquired AFTER mastery of the form ability to correct regular and irregular verbs ≈ 6 yrs.
dependent upon development of other subsystems
May be essential for semantic organization
Meta-linguistic development is inter-related with:
i. Language use
ii. Cognitive development
iii. Reading ability
iv. Academic achievement
v. Stimulation & Play
3 levels of pragmatics
utterance
discourse
social and cultural conventions