1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Mary Ainsworth (1970) procedure (1)
The strange situation was developed by Ainsworth and Bell
The aim was to be able to observe key attachment behaviours as a mean of assessing the quality of a baby’s attachment to a caregiver.
The strange situation is a controlled observation (designed to measure the security of attachment that a baby displays towards a caregiver.
It takes place in a room with quite controlled conditions, with a one-way mirror and cameras through which psychologists can observe the baby’s behaviour.
Mary Ainsworth (1970) procedure (2)
The procedure had seven episodes each of which lasted 3 minutes
Baby is encouraged to explore
Stranger comes in, talks to caregiver and approaches baby
Caregiver leaves baby and stranger to get=ether
Caregiver returns and stranger leaves
Caregiver leaves baby alone
Stranger returns
Caregiver returns and is reunited with baby
Mary Ainsworth (1970) behaviours measured in baby
Proximity seeking - a baby with good quality attachment will stay fairly close to caregiver
Secure base behaviour - good attachment enables a baby to feel confident to explore, using their caregiver as a secure base
Stranger anxiety- one of the signs of becoming closely attached is a display of anxiety when a stranger approaches
Separation anxiety - another sign of becoming attached is to protest at separation from the caregiver
Reunion behaviour - babies who are securely attached greet the caregiver’s return with pleasure and seek comfort
Mary Ainsworth (1970) findings (1)
Ainsworth found that there were distinct patterns in the way that babies behaved, identifying three main types of attachment:
Insecure - avoidant attachment (Type A) =
These babies explore freely but do not seek proximity or show secure-base behaviour.
They should little of no reaction when their caregiver leaves and little stranger anxiety
They make little effort to make contact when the caregiver returns and may even avoid such contact
About 20-25% of British babies are classified as insecure-avoidant.
Mary Ainsworth (1970) findings (2)
Secure attachment (Type B) =
These babies explore happily but regularly go back to their caregiver (proximity-seeking and secure-base behaviour)
They usually show moderate separation anxiety and moderate stranger anxiety
Securely attached babies require and accept comfort from the caregiver in the reunion stage
About 60-65% of British babies are classified as secure.
Mary Ainsworth (1970) findings (3)
Insecure - resistant attachment (Type C) =
These babies seek greater proximity than others and so explore less
They show high levels of stranger and separation anxiety but they resist comfort when reunited with their caregivers.
Around 3% of British babies are classified as insecure - resistant
A03 - strange situation has good predictive validity
Madigan did a meta-analysis of strange situation studies and found that insecure attachment predicted aggression and mental health issues later in childhood
In contrast, Ward has reported positive mental health outcomes for infants assessed as securely attached in the strange situation
This shows that the strange situation measures something real and meaningful in a baby’s development
A03 - the strange situation may be culture bound
The strange situation test might not have the same meaning in countries outside Europe and the US where it was created.
Cultural differences mean babies respond differently (Japanese babies show anxiety in the strange situation because they are not used to being left by the caregiver, Takahashi)
This means it is difficult to know what the strange situation is ensuing in some non EU and US countries/cultures
A03 - Ainsworth didn’t consider other attachment types
Main and Solomon (1986) claimed that these is a fourth category of attachment - disorganised (type D) which is a mix of resistant and avoidant behaviours
However, type D babies are unusual and generally have experienced some form of severe neglect or abuse, associated with later psychological conditions.
This means that Ainsworth’s classification is adequate as a description of typical variations of attachment.