1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
the social construction of illness
concepts of illness change over time
- prescientific: illness as deserved punishment for immoral behavior
- across time, powerless people are still often blamed for their illness
medical model of illness
views illness as a problem with the body’s normal biological functioning. doctors look for physical evidence to identify a disease and determine what is causing it
- objective: illness is identified through evidence, such as lab tests, physical exams, and recognizable symptoms
- focus: finding the biological cause of a disease
- diagnosis: doctors look for symptoms that match a known medical condition
ex. a doctor diagnoses diabetes by examining blood sugar levels and other medical evidence
sociological model of illness
looks at how society, culture, politics, and social norms influence how illnesses are defined, diagnosed, and treated
- social forces: culture and society can influence how a condition is understood or diagnosed
- moral category: society may judge certain conditions or behaviors are as good or bad, normal or abnormal
- deviance: a condition may be considered deviant when it differs from society’s expectations
- political: labeling something an illness can benefit some groups more than others, such as medical professionals, pharmaceutical companies, or people seeking access to treatment
medicine as an institution
medicine is an institution of social control - ensure that people conform
- medical providers have the power to decide whether someone is truly ill and deserves sympathy or is simply lazy
3 examples of medicine as an institution of social control
medicalization, genetic research, the sick role
medicalization
the process of defining a condition or behavior as a medical problem that requires a medical solution. something that may have once been viewed as a normal behavior, personal problem, or social issue becomes something that doctors diagnose and treat
- one or more groups must benefit from defining a condition as a medical problem
- medicalization can expand the definition of an illness to include more behaviors or conditions
consequences of medicalization
helpful impact: promotes social awareness of a problem, can lead to better treatment, can validate individuals’ sense that they are ill
possible harm: increases power of doctors, decreases power of other social authorities, medical treatment deemed only logical solution, depoliticization, used to justify voluntary and involuntary treatment
the shifting engines of medicalization
before 1980s: mainly driven by doctors and their authority, social movements also helped define conditions as illnesses (PTSD, Alzheimer’s)
after the 1980s: increasingly driven by commercial and market interests, biotechnology (new tests and technologies), pharmaceuticals (companies promote medications and treatments), consumers (patients seek specific treatments), managed care (insurance companies influence treatment and coverage
genetic research
the shift toward defining genes as the cause of human disease, behavior, and differences
the sick role
describes society’s expectations or how sick people should behave and how others should treat them
- being sick excuses you from some responsibilities, but you are expected to try to recover and return to your normal roles
elements of the sick role
the sick person has a legitimate reason for not fulfilling his/her typical social role. the more severe the illness, the greater the exemption from social responsibilities. exemptions require legitimation by physician
sickness is beyond individual control - individual NOT responsible
sick person must see sickness as undesirable and work to get well
sick person should seek and follow medical advice
critiques of the sick role
1. not all sick people behave the way Parsons suggest
2. the sick role does not necessarily apply to people with chronic diseases who cannot be restores to normal functioning, no matter how willing they may be to cooperate with the physician
3. the physician-patient relationship is based on office settings and can be different in emergency rooms, hospitals, a patient’s home, and public health campaigns
4. the sick role has middle-class orientation and pattern of behavior that may not apply to people lower on the social scale. some people may deny the sick role because they cannot earn a living if sick
conrad & leiter: from Lydia Pinkham to Queen Levitra
how advertising influences medicalization and encourages people to view conditions as medical problems that need treatment
ethical drugs relied on medical professionals, while patent drugs relied on advertising to attract customers
medical model of disability
a deficit within an individuals mind or body, which should be cured if possibly
individualized disability has potential to be blaming the individual for causing the problems they are experiencing
sociological model of disability
disability results from responses to bodies that fail to meet social expectations or from limitations in the social or physical environment
the social distribution of disability
15% of noninstitutionalized adults in the United States have a disability
rates have increased over time - in the past, death more likely; now disability more likely
most common among poorer persons, older persons, women, and African Americans
understanding chronic pain
roughly 40% of Americans have chronic pain
a symptom, not an illness
most common underlying reason for disability
consequences of chronic pain
physically - sleep deprivation, exhaustion
socially - damage to relationships, increases depression, anxiety, risk of suicide
treatment (for chronic pain) is affected by age, ethnicity, gender, income
women - significantly more likely than men to encounter doctors who focus on psychiatric causes and prescribe sedatives or psychotherapy rather than pain meds
troubling - women have to appear neither too sick nor too well and neither too assertive or too passive in order to receive treatment
minorities - doctors routinely think they are seeking drugs for recreational use
lower income individuals - pain more often from work which employers downplay
why Americans feel more pain - Kristof
elderly have most pain
U.S. - middle ages, especially jobless and less educated
chronic pain - associated with troubled childhoods, loneliness, job insecurity
Poor Americans are more than 3x likely to report pain as wealthy Americans
illness behavior
process of defining, interpreting, and responding to symptoms. more likely to seek care if
symptoms are frequent, persistent, visible, and severe enough to interfere with daily activities
lack alternative explanations for symptoms
trust in doctors is high and family and friends encourage seeking medical help
no psychological, economic, or practical barriers from accessing health care
living with disability and chronic illness
women - more likely to seek medical care
age - elderly more likely to seek care often until they get tired or too many medical visits
working-class/poor - tend to put off care and accept pain as unavoidable part of hard work. affordability and access also an issue
racial/ethnic minorities - less likely to seek care
managing treatment regimes (conventional)
conventional health care
focus on compliance (health belief model)
assumes noncompliance due to psychological process internal to the patient (may not understand treatment, lack of resources)
assumes compliance is always good (treatment may be disruptive, experimental, ineffective, etc.)
managing treatment regimes (alternative)
alternative therapies
herbal and dietary supplements, deep breathing, meditation
compliment rather than replace medicine
disproportionately college-educated women under 65
feel modern medicine focuses on treatment not prevention
placebos
managing stigma with chronic illness
attempt to avoid stigma by hiding it or deflecting attention
challenge the basis of the stigma - fighting for rights, body acceptance/positivity
medical model of mental illness
mental illness as an objective reality
sociological model
metal illness as largely a social construction
the epidemiology of mental illness
in all societies, the behavior of some individuals will be considered unacceptable and incomprehensible
social stress and mental illness
chronic stress affects mental illness more than acute stress does
researchers look at: number of stressful life events, the meaning attributed to a life event, and the resources available to an individual to deal with a life event
race/ethnicity and mental illness
Blacks have less overall depression and anxiety than Whites
when depressed, Blacks tend to be more likely than Whites to be chronically or persistently depressed, have more severe symptoms, show higher levels of impairment, and be less likely to seek or receive treatment
Blacks showing self-esteem, sense of mastery, and family support are able to reduce the effects of stress on symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress
Black women that shows their social networks of family and friends help them cope significantly with the stress of their lives
among Hispanics, extended families seem to help reduce stress
gender and mental illness
men - higher rates of paranoid schizophrenia, substance abuse, and impulse control disorders
women - higher rates of mood disorders and anxiety disorders
women employed outside the home tend to show less psychological distress than stay at home wives but more distress than employed men
social class and mental illness
social class has strongest and most consistent impact on mental illness
social stress theory: class based stress leads to mental disorder
social drift theory: mental problems lead to lower social class
sociological model of mental illness
society labels behavior as mental illness when people in power view them as unacceptable or incomprehensible
cognitive norms: expectations for how people think
performance norms: expectations for how people behave
feeling norms: expectations for how people express emotions
the problem of diagnosis
mental illness diagnosis is subjective and influenced by social expectations
Rosenhan experiment (1973) - 8 healthy researchers faked symptoms (hearing voices) and were admitted to mental hospitals. Staff continued to see them as mentally ill even when they acted normally
main finding - psychiatric diagnoses can be subjective and influenced by labels
cultural variations - behaviors considered mentally ill in one culture may be normal in another
the antipsychiatry critique (Goffman)
mental hospitals can harm patients by taking away their independence and identity
total institutions - places that control nearly every part of a person’s life and separate them from society
self-fulfilling prophecy - patients begin acting how others expect them to act
mortification - loss of self-identity due to institutional treatment
depersonalization - losing independence and feelingless human
deinstitutionalization
shift from long-term hospital stays to treatment in the community, beginning in 1955
causes: reduced health care and low-income housing funding, increased criminal justice funding, rise of managed care, greater emphasis on individualism, not caused by new medications
effects: positive - more cost-effective, increased access to science based treatment. negative - too much focus on medication instead of talk therapy, diagnosis becomes a checklist of symptoms
remedicalizing mental illness
shift back toward viewing mental illness as a biological problem rather than a social one
biological revolution - since the 1980s, focus on brain chemistry, neurological, and genetic causes
downplays social causes of mental illness
promoted by doctors, media, and pharmaceutical companies
most people now view mental illness as biological
becoming a mental patient
people try to avoid being label mentally ill by managing their emotions to fit social expectations
self-labeling: how individuals view and label their own mental health
feeling work: trying to make emotions match what society considers appropriate
labeling by friends, family and the public: families often hesitate to label loved ones as mentally ill
psychiatric labeling: mental health professionals identify and diagnose the person
US healthcare
the United States is the only more developed nation that does NOT guarantee affordable healthcare to its citizens
more a combination of public and private health insurers, health care providers, and healthcare settings
History of US health insurance
before the great depression Americans paid for health care out of pocket
1945 - Truman proposed national health insurance for all, but Congress rejected it
opposition to national health care - labor unions, and AMA
Blue cross - first major insurance programs, providers paid for each service, for healthier people, everyone pays based on the average risk of the community
HMOs - designed to make healthcare affordable, doctors receive salaries instead of payment per service, monitor unnecessary care, focus on prevention