NMT Boards – Image Processing & Informatics

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/212

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:14 PM on 10/8/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

213 Terms

1
New cards

Predominant photon interaction in soft tissue at nuclear medicine energies

Compton scatter

2
New cards

Interaction in which a photon gives ALL its energy to an inner-shell electron

Photoelectric absorption

3
New cards

Interaction responsible for full-energy photopeak counts in the crystal

Photoelectric absorption

4
New cards

Minimum energy needed for pair production or positron decay

1.02 MeV

5
New cards

Z and A change in positron decay and electron capture

Z −1, A unchanged

6
New cards

Decay mode used by proton-rich nuclides with less than 1.02 MeV available

Electron capture

7
New cards

Energy and angle of the two annihilation photons

511 keV each, ~180° apart

8
New cards

Two decay modes that produce the SAME daughter

Electron capture and positron decay

9
New cards

Percent error (1 SD) formula for N counts

100 ÷ √N

10
New cards

Counts needed for 1% error

10,000 counts

11
New cards

Percent error for 40,000 counts

0.5%

12
New cards

Confidence level for ±2 SD

95%

13
New cards

95% range for an average of 12,555 cpm

12,331–12,779 cpm

14
New cards

Counting-time formula for a desired percent error

[(Rs + 2Rb) ÷ Rs²] × (100 ÷ v)²

15
New cards

Test used to detect systematic counting error

Chi-square test

16
New cards

Type of error that can be predicted but never eliminated

Random error

17
New cards

Precision means

Repeatability (low random error)

18
New cards

Accuracy means

Correctness (no systematic error)

19
New cards

On semilog paper, exponential decay plots as

A straight line

20
New cards

Instrument best for finding contamination

GM survey meter

21
New cards

NRC-required survey meter reading range

0.1–100 mR/hr

22
New cards

Instrument for ACCURATE exposure rates from therapy patients

Portable ionization chamber (cutie pie)

23
New cards

Instrument used for wipe tests and blood/urine samples

Well counter

24
New cards

Activity above which the well counter shows dead-time losses

~2 µCi (74 kBq)

25
New cards

Collimator that gives better resolution but lower sensitivity

LEHR (high-resolution)

26
New cards

Collimator that is a compromise of resolution and sensitivity

LEAP / GAP (all-purpose)

27
New cards

Collimator type that magnifies the image

Converging

28
New cards

Collimator type that minifies the image

Diverging

29
New cards

Effect of increasing source-to-collimator distance on parallel-hole resolution

Resolution decreases

30
New cards

Tc-99m 20% energy window range

126–154 keV

31
New cards

In-111 245 keV 20% energy window range

~221–269 keV

32
New cards

Tl-201 energy windows (Bolus Ch. 20)

30% at 70 keV + 15% at 167 keV

33
New cards

Maximum counts per pixel in byte mode

256 (8 bits)

34
New cards

Maximum counts per pixel in word mode

65,536 (16 bits)

35
New cards

What happens when a pixel overflows

Extra counts are lost (inaccurate data)

36
New cards

Memory needed for word mode vs. byte mode

Twice as much

37
New cards

Memory for a 128 × 128 word SPECT with 64 projections

~2 MB (2,097,152 bytes)

38
New cards

Pixel size formula

FOV ÷ (matrix × zoom)

39
New cards

Pixel size for 500 mm FOV, 512 matrix, zoom 1.0

0.97 mm

40
New cards

Rule of thumb for pixel size relative to system FWHM

≤ one-third of FWHM

41
New cards

Does post-acquisition zoom improve resolution

No (only enlarges)

42
New cards

Requirement for the uniformity flood when using SPECT zoom

Acquire flood at the same zoom

43
New cards

Acquisition mode synchronized to the ECG R-wave

Gated

44
New cards

Acquisition mode storing each event as x, y and time

List mode

45
New cards

Main advantage of list mode

Retrospective reframing/regating

46
New cards

Bolus renal dynamic frame rate example

20 s/frame × 25 min (75 frames)

47
New cards

HIDA dynamic framing

1 frame/min for 60 min

48
New cards

Artifact caused by simple back-projection

Star (spoke/streak) artifact

49
New cards

Filter that removes the star artifact in FBP

Ramp (high-pass) filter

50
New cards

Major limitation of filtered back-projection

No attenuation model; amplifies noise

51
New cards

Iterative algorithm using ALL projection data each iteration

MLEM

52
New cards

Iterative algorithm that splits data into subsets

OSEM

53
New cards

OSEM equivalent MLEM iterations

Iterations × subsets

54
New cards

Requirement for the distance from the center of rotation

Must remain constant

55
New cards

Format PET data are stored in (LOR by angle and position)

Sinogram

56
New cards

Sensitivity gain of 3-D PET over 2-D

~5×

57
New cards

Scatter fraction in 3-D PET

~30–40%

58
New cards

Butterworth filter's dominant control

Cutoff frequency

59
New cards

Effect of lowering a filter's cutoff frequency

Smoother/blurrier image

60
New cards

Number of parameters in a Hanning filter

One (cutoff)

61
New cards

Filter type of Butterworth and Hanning

Low-pass

62
New cards

Nyquist frequency in cycles/pixel

0.5 cycles/pixel

63
New cards

Appearance of an over-filtered image

Mushy/blurry; lesions hidden

64
New cards

CT windowing maps what to gray levels

Hounsfield units

65
New cards

PET coincidence timing window

~4–12 ns

66
New cards

PET randoms delayed window

60–100 ns

67
New cards

Term for PET localizing events without a lead collimator

Electronic collimation

68
New cards

PET crystal with highest attenuation but slow and low light

BGO

69
New cards

Crystals fast enough for time-of-flight

LSO and LYSO

70
New cards

PET spatial resolution vs. SPECT

~4 mm vs. ~12 mm

71
New cards

PET sensitivity relative to a gamma camera

50–100× more sensitive

72
New cards

Axial FOV per PET bed position

15–18 cm

73
New cards

What time-of-flight PET does

Localizes the event along the LOR

74
New cards

Prompt coincidences consist of

Trues + randoms + scatters

75
New cards

NECR formula

T² ÷ (T + S + kR)

76
New cards

NECR equals the square of what

Signal-to-noise ratio

77
New cards

Optimal injected activity relative to NECR

At or below peak NECR

78
New cards

Random coincidences rise with

Activity² and 3-D mode

79
New cards

Coincidence where a photon was Compton-scattered onto a wrong LOR

Scatter

80
New cards

Are PET randoms corrected by the energy window

No (delayed window or singles)

81
New cards

Daily PET QC

Blank scan and PMT baseline/gain check

82
New cards

Quarterly PET QC

Normalization and cross-calibration

83
New cards

Minimum duration of a PET normalization scan

≥6 hours

84
New cards

PET calibration converting pixel values to activity/mL for SUV

Absolute activity (cross) calibration

85
New cards

Thin diagonal line on a PET blank-scan sinogram

Single faulty crystal

86
New cards

Broad diagonal band on a PET blank-scan sinogram

Block/PMT (module) failure

87
New cards

Which is acquired first in PET/CT

CT

88
New cards

X-ray production process in the CT tube from braking electrons

Bremsstrahlung

89
New cards

Low-dose CT kVp range

80–140 kVp

90
New cards

Low-dose CT mAs range

20–120 mAs

91
New cards

Effect of raising kVp on CT

Less noise, more dose, less contrast

92
New cards

CT pitch formula

Table travel per rotation ÷ (slices × slice width)

93
New cards

Pitch for 40 mm table travel with 16 × 2.5 mm slices

1.0

94
New cards

Effect of a higher reconstruction kernel number

Sharper image

95
New cards

CT noise from too few x-rays

Quantum mottle

96
New cards

Hounsfield unit formula

1,000 × (µtissue − µwater) ÷ µwater

97
New cards

HU of water

0

98
New cards

HU of air

−1,000

99
New cards

HU for µtissue 0.21 and µwater 0.19

~105 HU

100
New cards

CT window width controls

Contrast