1/212
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Predominant photon interaction in soft tissue at nuclear medicine energies
Compton scatter
Interaction in which a photon gives ALL its energy to an inner-shell electron
Photoelectric absorption
Interaction responsible for full-energy photopeak counts in the crystal
Photoelectric absorption
Minimum energy needed for pair production or positron decay
1.02 MeV
Z and A change in positron decay and electron capture
Z −1, A unchanged
Decay mode used by proton-rich nuclides with less than 1.02 MeV available
Electron capture
Energy and angle of the two annihilation photons
511 keV each, ~180° apart
Two decay modes that produce the SAME daughter
Electron capture and positron decay
Percent error (1 SD) formula for N counts
100 ÷ √N
Counts needed for 1% error
10,000 counts
Percent error for 40,000 counts
0.5%
Confidence level for ±2 SD
95%
95% range for an average of 12,555 cpm
12,331–12,779 cpm
Counting-time formula for a desired percent error
[(Rs + 2Rb) ÷ Rs²] × (100 ÷ v)²
Test used to detect systematic counting error
Chi-square test
Type of error that can be predicted but never eliminated
Random error
Precision means
Repeatability (low random error)
Accuracy means
Correctness (no systematic error)
On semilog paper, exponential decay plots as
A straight line
Instrument best for finding contamination
GM survey meter
NRC-required survey meter reading range
0.1–100 mR/hr
Instrument for ACCURATE exposure rates from therapy patients
Portable ionization chamber (cutie pie)
Instrument used for wipe tests and blood/urine samples
Well counter
Activity above which the well counter shows dead-time losses
~2 µCi (74 kBq)
Collimator that gives better resolution but lower sensitivity
LEHR (high-resolution)
Collimator that is a compromise of resolution and sensitivity
LEAP / GAP (all-purpose)
Collimator type that magnifies the image
Converging
Collimator type that minifies the image
Diverging
Effect of increasing source-to-collimator distance on parallel-hole resolution
Resolution decreases
Tc-99m 20% energy window range
126–154 keV
In-111 245 keV 20% energy window range
~221–269 keV
Tl-201 energy windows (Bolus Ch. 20)
30% at 70 keV + 15% at 167 keV
Maximum counts per pixel in byte mode
256 (8 bits)
Maximum counts per pixel in word mode
65,536 (16 bits)
What happens when a pixel overflows
Extra counts are lost (inaccurate data)
Memory needed for word mode vs. byte mode
Twice as much
Memory for a 128 × 128 word SPECT with 64 projections
~2 MB (2,097,152 bytes)
Pixel size formula
FOV ÷ (matrix × zoom)
Pixel size for 500 mm FOV, 512 matrix, zoom 1.0
0.97 mm
Rule of thumb for pixel size relative to system FWHM
≤ one-third of FWHM
Does post-acquisition zoom improve resolution
No (only enlarges)
Requirement for the uniformity flood when using SPECT zoom
Acquire flood at the same zoom
Acquisition mode synchronized to the ECG R-wave
Gated
Acquisition mode storing each event as x, y and time
List mode
Main advantage of list mode
Retrospective reframing/regating
Bolus renal dynamic frame rate example
20 s/frame × 25 min (75 frames)
HIDA dynamic framing
1 frame/min for 60 min
Artifact caused by simple back-projection
Star (spoke/streak) artifact
Filter that removes the star artifact in FBP
Ramp (high-pass) filter
Major limitation of filtered back-projection
No attenuation model; amplifies noise
Iterative algorithm using ALL projection data each iteration
MLEM
Iterative algorithm that splits data into subsets
OSEM
OSEM equivalent MLEM iterations
Iterations × subsets
Requirement for the distance from the center of rotation
Must remain constant
Format PET data are stored in (LOR by angle and position)
Sinogram
Sensitivity gain of 3-D PET over 2-D
~5×
Scatter fraction in 3-D PET
~30–40%
Butterworth filter's dominant control
Cutoff frequency
Effect of lowering a filter's cutoff frequency
Smoother/blurrier image
Number of parameters in a Hanning filter
One (cutoff)
Filter type of Butterworth and Hanning
Low-pass
Nyquist frequency in cycles/pixel
0.5 cycles/pixel
Appearance of an over-filtered image
Mushy/blurry; lesions hidden
CT windowing maps what to gray levels
Hounsfield units
PET coincidence timing window
~4–12 ns
PET randoms delayed window
60–100 ns
Term for PET localizing events without a lead collimator
Electronic collimation
PET crystal with highest attenuation but slow and low light
BGO
Crystals fast enough for time-of-flight
LSO and LYSO
PET spatial resolution vs. SPECT
~4 mm vs. ~12 mm
PET sensitivity relative to a gamma camera
50–100× more sensitive
Axial FOV per PET bed position
15–18 cm
What time-of-flight PET does
Localizes the event along the LOR
Prompt coincidences consist of
Trues + randoms + scatters
NECR formula
T² ÷ (T + S + kR)
NECR equals the square of what
Signal-to-noise ratio
Optimal injected activity relative to NECR
At or below peak NECR
Random coincidences rise with
Activity² and 3-D mode
Coincidence where a photon was Compton-scattered onto a wrong LOR
Scatter
Are PET randoms corrected by the energy window
No (delayed window or singles)
Daily PET QC
Blank scan and PMT baseline/gain check
Quarterly PET QC
Normalization and cross-calibration
Minimum duration of a PET normalization scan
≥6 hours
PET calibration converting pixel values to activity/mL for SUV
Absolute activity (cross) calibration
Thin diagonal line on a PET blank-scan sinogram
Single faulty crystal
Broad diagonal band on a PET blank-scan sinogram
Block/PMT (module) failure
Which is acquired first in PET/CT
CT
X-ray production process in the CT tube from braking electrons
Bremsstrahlung
Low-dose CT kVp range
80–140 kVp
Low-dose CT mAs range
20–120 mAs
Effect of raising kVp on CT
Less noise, more dose, less contrast
CT pitch formula
Table travel per rotation ÷ (slices × slice width)
Pitch for 40 mm table travel with 16 × 2.5 mm slices
1.0
Effect of a higher reconstruction kernel number
Sharper image
CT noise from too few x-rays
Quantum mottle
Hounsfield unit formula
1,000 × (µtissue − µwater) ÷ µwater
HU of water
0
HU of air
−1,000
HU for µtissue 0.21 and µwater 0.19
~105 HU
CT window width controls
Contrast