1/58
what if i killed myself in front of you
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Strier (1994)
papionins (semi-terrestrial cercopithicines) are typical primate. assumes F philopatry M dispersal; kinship based bonds; strong male dominance hierarchies and aggression. also points to false dich of abundant/ubiquitous leaves vs limited/patchy fruits
Gradistic
defined by retention of ancestral features (Pro. vs Anth.). Grad=grandpa
Cladistic
defined by derived features (Strep. vs Hapl.)
Fleagle & Reed 1996
Communities are more similar within the same biogeographic region. Communities with primates of related or the same taxa will be ecologically similar.
Kappeler and Heymann 1996
Convergence hypothesis (similar abiotic environments will lead to similar adaptations across taxa) not supported in primates in body size, activity pattern, diet, or group size
Reed and Fleagle 1995
Rainforest cover was associated with greater primate species diversity in every continent. Annual rainfall was associated with primate species diversity in every continent except Asia: Asia is composed of small islands so there is a cap on diversity
Beaudrot and Marshall 2019
Looks at effects of Dispersal limitation (animals could live in an area but can’t travel that far) and Environmental filtering (animals don’t live in areas they are not adapted to). EF had larger effect than predicted.
Harcourt 2000
Rapport effect (species occupy greater latitudinal extent further from the equator) supported primates globablly when Madagascar was excluded and within individual continents except South America
Rapport effect
Species occupy greater latitudinal extent further from the equator. Species further from equator deal with more climatic variation and are predicted to be generalists.
Harcourt and Schrier 2009
Found that Forster effect (species richness decreases further from equator) was supported in primates. Bergmann effect (body size larger further from equator) supported probably because of lack of tiny primates
Forster Effect
Taxonomic diversity decreases further from the equator
Bergmann effect
Body size gets larger further from the equator
Kay et al. 1997
In South America, plant productivity was found to be correlated with species richness but not tree species diversity. Plant productivity correlated with rainfall.
Alpha diversity
Species richness
Beta diversity
Species richness and abundance
Gazhorn 1989
Lemur groups partition themselves in many ways. Bigger body/ group size bigger patches also seperated by canopy level. Three communities of folivores seperate based on leaf chemical composition. Species within these groups same chemical composition but different activity patterns (nocturnal vs diurnal)
Noe and Bshary 1997
Red colobus maintain and initiate polyspecific associations with diana monkeys during chimp hunting season and when chimp calls played by researchers. Diana monkeys also initiate probably as protection from eagles.
Chapman and Onderdonk 1999
Primates are important in seed dispersal: Kibale forest fragments less diversity than parts of forest with intact frugivore populations
Species richness
Number of different species in an area
Species abundance
Number of individuals per species in area
Ammensalism
One species is unaffected the other is harmed
Competition
Both animals are harmed
Community acoording to Lamber 2012
Sympatric, synchronic assemblage of species
Fundemental niche
All habitats a species could hypothetically occupy
Realized niche
Habitat species occupies due to character displacement (result of competition)
Kappler and van Shaik 2002
Society is a group of conspecifics that interact with each other more than with others. Social organization is the sexual composition and spacial cohesiveness of a society. Mating systems reflect who is mating with who and who is actually reproducing.
Genetic mating system
Who is making infants (can only be found by genetic testing).
Social mating system
Who is mating
Sexual compositon of societies
OMU, MMMF, MMOF
Cohesiveness of societies
Cohesive, fission-fusion, multilevel societies
Mating systems
monogamy, polygyny, polyandry, polygynyandry
Janson 1992
Found that larger groups have to travel farther and are limited by time: thus individuals might have to decrease feeding or split. Found that larger groups did not benefit from increased food discovery. Found that large groups are attacked more by predators, but that predator success rate was lower.
van Shaik 1983
Tests IGFC hypothesis and PFC hypothesis. Found no feeding benefit for large groups: feeding competition sets upper limit on group size. Found that predation pressure was larger in smaller groups: predation pressure sets upper limit
van Shaik and Kappler 1992
Claim that female-infant association (as opposed to infant parking) evolved with male-female association. Males guard females, when females have baby it protects from infanticide.
Wrangham 1980
High quality patchy food will result in female bonding to defend patches, low quality dispersed food will not result in female bonding. Female philopatry is the result of kin coalitions.
van Shaik 1989
Scramble competition (food intake equal) vs. contest competition (food intake ranked). Low predation risk means more BGC because strong group cohesion is unnecessary, females form egalitarian ranking systems. High predation predicts WGS or WGC. Scramble competition vs. contest competition determined by food abundance and dispersal.
Isbell 1991
Food abundance predicts intergroup competition, food distrubution predicts intragroup competition. Limited food predicts larger homeranges as group size increases and more intergroup competition as group ranges overlap. Food clumping predicts increased day range size as group size increases and more intragroup competition as food is more defensible
Sterk 1997
DE predicts low WGC and BGC, RE predicts low WGC and high BGC, RN predicts high WGC and low BGC, RNT predicts variable WGC and high BGC. Predation risk causes female association and food abundance/dispersal causes group dynamics. Philopatric groups get larger and larger until they have to split because of carrying capacity and then risk predation so get larger again (cycle).
Thierry 2008
Primates are too complex to model. If we keep adding factors to a model the model becomes useless.
Koenig and Borries 2009
Refute Thierry, use models for individual clades, not all complexity is bad if it gets us closer to accuracy.
Differences between how socioecological models are split
Wrangham (1980) splits btwn FB and non-FB, van Schaik splits between types A, B, C, D, Sterck et al. (1997) splits between RN, RNT, DE, and RE, Isbell (1991) splits between contest & scramble between & within groups, contest & scramble between groups only, and no contest & scramble within/between groups
Differences in socioecological models re: female philopatry
coalitions with kin for Wrangham and van Schaik, Isbell suggests that female philopatry occurs when dispersal costs outweigh costs of staying
Milton 1981
Howlers- larger hindguts means longer digestion time need to rely on abundant foods. Couldn’t eat fruit bc calories used to travel/digest would be more than calories gained
Spiders- shorted hindguts means less complexity and shorter digestion time. Don’t eat leaves because couldn’t extract nutrients from them
Lambert 1989
Gut specialization is the result of dealing with complex carbs differently. Foregut fermentation is good for when you need to break down cell walls first and you can digest protien in microbes once they die. Caeco-colic fermentation is better to access all immediately bioavaiable evergy. Larger guts mean more space for volitle acids but body size not correlated with diet
Lambert and Rothman 2015
Fallback foods are not rigidly defined, depends on seasonality, competition, availability. Advocates for geometric frameworks (holistic, overlapping)
Takashi et al. 2019
Nutritional composition of the diets of blue monkeys stayed similar between groups and throughout seasons
Moy et al 2023
Microbiome of fully commensual baboons less diverse, more similar to humans. Partially commensual baboons did not lose diversity, suggesting a threshold of similarity
Hobaiter et al.
There need to be more local researchers in primatology, and we need to train students and hire them
Fernandez et al. (2022)
Main threats are bio resource use (hunting and logging included) and agriculture, but threats vary based on location
Bezanson & McNamara (2019)
Consider bias, broader impacts in primatology
Hill (2002)
Community conservation
Digestable energy
Calories in food that are accessible to body
Metabolizable energy
Digestable energy subtracted by losses due to metabolic processes
Caecum fermenters
Lemurs, howlers
Colon fermenters
OWM
Fruit
Low protien high energy
Folivory
High fiber: protien, eat young leaves to avoid
Macronutrients
Protien, sugar, starch, fat
Micronutrients
Fatty acids, amino acids, minerals and vitamins