1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
short-term memory (i.e. working memory)
active contents
Short duration→up to 20 or 30 seconds
Small capacity→7 +/- 2
Phonetic code→acoustic confusions
long-term memory
No longer active; retrieved
Long duration→seconds to years
Large capacity→essentially no limit
Semantic code→semantic confusions
Memories about facts and information
serial position effect

primacy effect
earlier items get more rehearsals
More likely to get into LTM
recency effect
Last items still active in STM
Just get “dumped” out
H.M. (Henry Molaaison)
Epilepsy, bilateral removal of hippocampus
Intact STM
Intact LTM before operation
Inability to commit new information to LTM
Clive Wearing
Viral encephalitis, swelling in brain damaged hippocampus
Intact STM
Intact LTM from long ago
Inability to commit new information to LTM
Jimmie G
Korsakoff’s syndrome: damage to the hippocampus
Intact STM
Intact LTM from long ago
Inability to commit new information to LTM
Patient K.F.
Parietal lobe damage
STM capacity of just 2
Reduces recency effect
Functioning LTM
population dissociations
No difference between populations on one measure, but a difference between populations on another
H.M., Clive, Jimmie: no difference between patients and non-amnesiacs on measures of STM; difference with LTM
K.F.: no difference with LTM, difference with STM
Implications of the neuropsychology of STM/LTM
Separate brain systems
One damaged system that is responsible for the deficient form of memory
Second, intact system that is responsible for the normally functioning form of memory
explicit memory
declarative, conscious, and intentional
episodic memory
semantic memory
episodic memory
personal events
Ex: Remembering your high school graduation day
semantic memory
facts, knowledge
Ex: Knowing that Paris is the capital of France.
implicit memory
memory can occur without explicit awareness or deliberate retrieval
priming
procedural memory
conditioning

retrograde amnesia
Cannot remember events before brain damage
Can’t remember old memories
General knowledge is usually better preserved
Memories from the distant past are usually better preserved
anterograde amnesia
cannot remember events that occur after the brain damage
Can't form new memories
Vague recollections
Spontaneous productions
Skill learning
Indication that new learning has occurred
Warrington and Weiskrantz
Examined potential new learning with verbal material
different tests used
participants were still comepleting words correctly even when they didn’t remember the word
amnesic patients performed significantly worse than healthy controls on explicit memory tasks, but showed identical, normal performance on implicit memory tasks
explicit memory can act completely independent of implicit memory

direct memory test
Directly refer to a past event
Subjects are instructed to use memory
Aware that using memory (explicit memory)
Free recall, cued recall, serial recall
indirect memory test
do not refer to past events
No mention of memory
Simply ask to perform current task
Memory may be without awareness (implicit memory)
indirect memory tests types
perceptual identification
fragment completion
homophone spelling
perceptual identification
priming: information has gotten into your memory
fragment completion
Series of words shown but letters missing
primed to fill in those letters correctly
homophone spelling
Bear vs bare after showing a lot of “bare” words
priming
general study method

jacoby and dallas (1981)
showed that varied levels of processing (e.g., visual, acoustic, or semantic analysis) significantly affected explicit recognition memory, but had no effect on implicit perceptual identification (priming)
population dissociation

Converging evidence that shows that explicit memory and implicit memory involve different brain structures
Rely on separate, dissociable brain networks, supported by clinical amnesia cases, neuroimaging, and double-dissociation studies
Population dissociations
Experimental dissociations
Developmental dissociations
Drug-induced dissociations