1/131
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Why are purebred animals more prone to diseases?
Characterized by small numbers of founders, with strong selection for morphology, size, and colour.
Leads to many health issues (this is basic genetics sorry)
Common dog purebred health issues
Hip dysplasia
hip joint doesn’t develop properly
common in large breeds
German Shepherd
Breathing problems
shortened snout has been bred on
Bulldogs
Epilepsy
neurological condition more common in some purebreds
Heart defects
more common in some purebreds
Eye problems
Beagles prone to glaucoma
Pugs prone to eye issues to to facial structure
Bloat
life-threatening condition often seen in deep-chested breeds
e.g. boxers
Skin and ear issues
Infections due to folded ears
Bloodhounds
Common health issues in other purebred animals
Persian cats
Brachycephaly
Flat faces cause lifelong breathing problems, chronic tear duct blockage, and dental misalignment
Scottish fold cats
Ear fold
Causes painful disease that degrades joint cartilage throughout the entire body
Broiler chickens
Rapid growth
Accelerated muscle growth causes skeletal lameness, leg deformities, sudden heart failure
Domestic turkeys
Massive breast muscles
Selected for huge breasts, modern turkeys cannot reproduce naturally
Dairy cows
High milk yield
Extreme milk production causes chronic udder inflammation (mastitis) and metabolic exhaustion
Belgian blue cattle
double muscling
extreme muscle growth, frequently requires c-section for birthing due to the calves being too large
Explain why inter-species rules and intra-species rules do not overlap in regards to body size and life expectancy
Bigger species live longer because they evolve slower metabolisms and have fewer natural predators
e.g. elephants outlive mice
Smaller individuals live longer because extremely rapid growth in giant varieties causes severe cellular stress and accelerates biological ageing
Pain in horses
Difficult to assess
“Ridden Horse Pain Ethogram” developed with 24 behaviours indicating pain
Difficult when it is being ridden as the rider may affect the behaviour with reins, leg signals, body weight etc
Horse is taken away from the rest of the flock when ridden which makes it display other behaviours
Immune system in invertebrates vs vertebrates
Invertebrates
Innate immunity
Provides immediate, non-specific protection from pathogens
e.g. skin, phagocytes
Vertebrates
Innate immunity
Adaptive immunity
slower, antigen-specific response that develops memory
Antigen
Foreign substance that enters your body, e.g. bacteria, viruses, fungi, allergens, venom etc.
Antibodies
Attach to antigens to make it easier for immune cells to destroy the antigen.
Explain how the adaptive immune system works
Upon encountering a pathogen, a naive B cell migrates to a germinal centre to partner directly with T cells. This collaboration guides the B cell to differentiate into regulatory, short-lived, or specialised long-lived plasma cells. Ultimately, this teamwork yields memory B cells and plasma cells that produce targeted antibodies (IgG, IgA, IgE) for long-term immunity.
Explain how stress affects the immune system
Cortisol decreases T-cell activity:
High levels of this glucocorticoid reduce the activation and multiplication of T-cells, which lowers defence against infections (B-cells are dependent on T-cells -> reduced antibody response) and reduces vaccine effectiveness.
Adrenaline & Noradrenaline shift priority:
These hormones suppress the adaptive immune system (T-cells and B-cells) but boost innate immune cells (like macrophages) to handle immediate, physical threats
Study in mice:
Acute stress in mice led to increased norepinephrine levels, which enhanced macrophage activity but concurrently suppressed the activation of T cells.
In contrast, chronic stress in mice led to decreased B cell function and impaired antibody responses, emphasizing the long-term impact of stress on humoral immunity.
Why (ultimate) does stress affect the immune system?
To save energy
Redirects energy-heavy tasks like building T/B-cells so vital glucose and oxygen can be transferred to the muscles to fight/flight instead
To survive the minute
Long-term immunity toward a future illness is useless if you get caught by a predator right now
To heal wounds fast
Focus shift to the innate immune system, sending white blood cells (a type of phagocyte) directly to the skin to quickly patch up physical injuries
Acute stress and immune activation
Acute stress often leads to a temporary enhancement of immune function, known as the “stress-induced immune response”, preparing the body to respond effectively to immediate threats. It facilitates the mobilization of immune cells and increases the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Acute stress can increase the number of certain immune cells circulating
in the blood, making them more available to travel to a site of injury or
infection.
Chronic stress and immune dysregulation
Chronic stress can lead to decreased T and B
lymphocyte proliferation, impairing/suppressing the
adaptive immune response and increasing susceptibility
to infections.
Acute stress vs Chronic stress and the immune system
Acute stress
Acute stress often leads to a temporary enhancement of immune function, known as the “stress-induced immune response”, preparing the body to respond effectively to immediate threats. It facilitates the mobilization of immune cells and increases the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Acute stress can increase the number of certain immune cells circulating in the blood, making them more available to travel to a site of injury or infection.
Chronic stress
Chronic stress can lead to decreased T and B lymphocyte proliferation, impairing/suppressing the adaptive immune response and increasing susceptibility to infections.
Social stress and the immune system
Farm animals exposed to social stressors have a reduced immune system.
Stocking density: increases the risk of infection spread; easier for pathogens to survive
Individual differences in stress/immune systems
E.g. in a study of cows:
Animals were categorized according to low or high cort levels after having experienced social isolation
only high-cort responders later developed a fever when undergoing an intramammary endotoxin challenge
Similar in pigs:
pigs categorized by effort in attempting escape from a restraint had differing changes in immune system following subsequent social isolation
Sickness behaviour
Adaptive, energy-saving strategy that maximises fitness during a health crisis
caused by the immune system, NOT the pathogens
shifts reproduction and growth toward immediate survival
cytokines (by the macrophages?) signal the brain to induce lethargy and anorexia to halt resource-heavy behaviours (e.g. foraging) to fuel immune defence and tissue repair
self-isolation to avoid predators and infection of conspecifics
Discuss how the microbiome affects the immune system
(Microbiome trains the immune system to distinguish between friend and foe)
Microbiome interacts with both innate and adaptive immune systems through microbial components and metabolites.
crucial for developing immune responses
disruption by factors (e.g. antibiotics, stress) can contribute to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases
How does stress affect the microbiome?
In mice, stress changes the composition of the microbiome
not clear how
Gastrointestinal disorders worsen during stress
Explain the microbiota-gut-brain axis
Gut microbiome influences behaviour and “gut feelings” via microbiota-gut-brain axis
Gut microbes affect mood, stress, and cognition by producing neurotransmitters, interacting with the immune system, and communicating via neural and hormonal pathways
Gut and brain send instant physical signals to each other
Intestinal cells release cytokines
The brain activates cortisol release to disrupt the gut
Gut bacteria produce fatty acids that protect the brain

Give examples of how the microbiome can affect behaviour
In mice, when given faecal microbiota transplantation, the behavioural traits of the recipients became more like those of the donor
Behavioural effects have been traced to specific subsets of the microbiota
Evidence suggests that Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium (both probiotics) alleviate anxiety and depressive-like symptoms
Hypothesis regarding the behavioural effect of microbiomes
Microbiota-driven alterations of host behaviour have lead to the hypothesis that some symbionts manipulate the host for their own ends
e.g. microorganisms may make animals more sociable, and even altruistic, in order to increase host contacts and enhance their transmission
Microbiome and the HPA axis
Germ-free mice have poorly developed immune systems
exhibit elevated levels of ACTH and corticosterone (e.g. stronger HPA responses) when subjected to stressors
dysregulation of the HPA axis
Discuss how domestication has influenced the gut microbiome
E.g. dogs/wolves began eating human food as well that are rich in starch
made them into calmer dogs (helped the domestication process)
Urbanization effect on animal health
Negative effect due to exposure to toxins, parasites, stress from habitat fragmentation and novel stressors like light and noise pollution
E.g. long-term data in house sparrows found nests affected by noise pollution had fewer young, lower body mass of offspring, and fewer recruits, even during cross-fostering
females also provided less food to the younglings in noisy areas
E.g. meta-analysis showed negative relationship between urbanization and health
Effects of stress depends on
Intensity of the stressor
Duration of the stressor
Timing of the stress exposure
brain is particularly sensitive to stress early and late in life
early life has a larger welfare impact on domesticated animals (few actually make it to old age)
stress experienced during critical early-life period can have long-lasting or permanent changes on the brain
Brain maturation involves multiple dynamic processes that are regulated by
genetic factors
environmental input
e.g. visual lateralization in chickens
if the chick/egg is incubated in darkness, the brain does not become lateralized
Developmental processes in the early postnatal brain
Axonal and dendritic growth
Synaptic stabilisation
Synaptic pruning
Epigenetics
= how our environment changes the gene expression
heritable, but no actual changes in the DNA
Two specific phenomena of interest:
Histone modification
how DNA wraps around histones (proteins)
DNA methylation
Moves histones to prevent/allow gene expression (on/off switch basically)
can be permanent
E.g. by cross-fostering, scientists found out that anxious parents raise anxious kids, while caring mothers causes permanent changes in the genetically anxious kids to become more secure adults.
Hippocampus is involved
The different maternal cares caused differences in DNA methylation in brains of the offspring
Hippocampus
Complex brain structure embedded deep into a temporal lobe
Major role in learning and memory
Discuss how early care of offspring can affect the offspring in adult life
(Using a cross-fostering experiment on rats):
Type of maternal care caused distinctive differences in DNA methylation in brains of offspring
Differences still present in adult offspring, affecting their stress responses
Corticosterone increase after physical restraint was less pronounced in adult offspring of more caring mothers, which demonstrated long-lasting effects of the epigenetic modifications
Female offspring having received more licking and grooming by their mother also behaved similarly towards their own offspring
Transgenerational effects may therefore remain for a long time by means of a reinstatement of the behavioural phenotype in every generation
Early life can be divided into:
Prenatal period
Before birth/hatch
Early postnatal
Right after birth/hatch
Adolescence
Just before sexual maturity
Prenatal stress
Mediated via mother (maternal stress)
a mother’s stress affects her daughter AND granddaughter
Very sensitive period due to the complex and rapid development of the embryo
a LOT happens from day to day
Effects on offspring:
Increased HPA-axis
Structural and functional changes in the limbic system and prefrontal cortex
Learning/memory deficit and increased anxiety levels
Decreased immune system
Lower birthweight (humans)
From when is the HPA-axis functional in chickens?
From day 15 of incubation (21 days in total)
Cort can be measured in the down-feathers of newly hatched chicks,
(but no cort in the egg yolk ??)
Discuss how CORT affects the reproductive system
Glucocorticoids can influence the synthesis of gonadal steroids both by downregulation of the gonadotrophins and via direct effects on the testis and the ovaries
Stress impacts the reproductive axis — the hypothalamus (to affect GnRH secretion) and the pituitary gland (to affect gonadotrophin secretion)
Elevated plasma CORT levels lead to
reduced plasma/egg testosterone and progesterone concentrations
reduced yolk/egg mass
How is offspring (fetus) protected by the mother’s cort levels ?
Mammalian fetus is partially protected from elevated cort exposure by placental 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (11β-HSD2)
(11 beta-HSD2) plays a crucial role in converting hormonally active cortisol to inactive cortisone
Extra embryonic membranes in birds eggs have same function as placenta in mammals
11β-HSD2 has been found in chicken oviduct/gonads
In vitro studies on chicken yolk follicles - Yolk follicles degrades corticosterone to 20β-dihydrocorticosterone
Effect of prenatal stress on the adult chicken brain findings:
Brain size not affected
Brain region size not affected
Neuronal density not affected
Non-neural density reduced
Altricial vs precocial
Altricial
Useless baby (underdeveloped)
Precocial
Functional baby (developed)
How does stress during early postnatal period affect adults?
E.g. rats who were separated earlier from mothers become more fearful
E.g. cats who were weaned earlier tend to wool-suck more
Examples of early life stress in production systems
Transport stress
Nutrition stress
Heat stress
Mixing stress
Antigen toxin stress
Weaning stress
Cold stress
Crowding stress
Why is the adolescence period sensitive for stress?
Large hormone alterations
HPA axis interacts with the HPG axis
Large behavioural alterations
Brain maturation
State some hypotheses why animals are so sensitive to stress
PAR hypothesis
Organism uses environmental cues during early life to forecast future conditions and permanently adjust to its long-term physiology
Developmental-mismatch hypothesis
Early experiences shape the brain and behaviour
major differences in stressors between the early years of development and later life stages are mismatches that can cause diseases (both physically and mentally)
Abnormal behaviour
Seen in captive animals, never in the wild (unless they are sick and the brain is affected)
Often stem from normal behaviours
e.g. giraffes roll their tongues to grab leaves
abnormal behaviour: uses tongue movement on objects with no food, e.g. fences/bars
Is either behaviour that
never occurs in nature (atypical)
abnormal in its occurrence, frequency, or intensity from the normal value
Define normal behaviour
Species-specific
Behaviour developed during evolutionary adaptation
Any learnt behaviour that serves the function of promoting fitness
Plays a role in facilitating homeostasis
E.g. birds huddling together for warmth, lion hunting for food
May vary with season and age
e.g. hormones, daylight, temperature
Define abnormal repetitive behaviour
Inappropriate, repetitive, and unvarying in goal or motor pattern
Divided into
Stereotypies
Repeated body motion/position that lack any goal or function
e.g. pacing
Impulsive/Compulsive behaviours
Repetition of a behaviour that has a goal
e.g. feather plucking in parrots to the point of naked skin
Often regarded as stress-coping mechanisms
Different types of abnormal behaviour exists between species and within species
What triggers abnormal behaviour in the captive environment?
Can be challenging to elucidate the trigger for abnormal behaviours
e.g. stereotypic digging in gerbils (digging onto the glass)
in this case, behaviour was reduced by tunnels, not substrate
a mechanism for the gerbil to cope with the lack of tunnels
in this case, the abnormal behaviour was goal related
e.g. pacing
performance more ”important” than the resource (despite often being linked with the need of large home ranges to hunt
The larger the difference between their normal home range and the size of the captive enclosure, the more the animals would engage in pacing.
behaviour related abnormal behaviour
Occurrence of abnormal behaviour varies between individuals in the same environment
Omnivores/herbivores mainly develop oral stereotypies due to the motivation to explore and seek food
if environment is kept barren/static, they can no longer explore or forage
Abnormal behaviours can spread across a population
might be learnt socially
first individual who develops the abnormal behaviour might have had another trigger than the other individuals
Reasons why it is difficult to disentangle the underlying proximate causes of abnormal behaviours:
Abnormal behaviours are hard to detect since they only take up a small portion of its time budget
Can look at the intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors
Intrinsic risk factors
Some species are more likely to perform a specific abnormal behaviour. Also:
Age
Sex
Temperament
Clinical condition
Extrinsic risk factors
Rearing history
Social environment
Physical environment
Clinical, research, and husbandry procedures
may cause stress that turns into abnormal behaviours
Intrinsic vs extrinsic risk factors
Intrinsic risk factors
Some species are more likely to perform a specific abnormal behaviour. Also:
Age
Sex
Temperament
Clinical condition
Extrinsic risk factors
Rearing history
Social environment
Physical environment
Clinical, research, and husbandry procedures
may cause stress that turns into abnormal behaviours
Give examples of abnormal behaviours and mention their risk factors
E.g. tail biting in pigs and feather plucking in chickens
omnivores/herbivores mainly develop oral stereotypies due to the motivation to explore and seek food
Pigs spend up to half their waking time rooting and chewing in search of food
Red Junglefowl use more than 60% of their time pecking and exploring
in static, barren environments, pen mates are the only part of the environment that moves and change
may develop into cannibalism
Risk factors:
Lack of enrichment
Wrong nutrition
Learned behaviour
Genetics
Sex
etc
Ultimate causes behind abnormal behaviours
Reproductive fitness is affected by humans
Explanations therefore tend to be proximate
Function of the behaviours may help us understand the welfare implications
e.g. specific environmental deficiencies
Stereotypic behaviours in (stabled) horses
E.g. crib biting, wind sucking, box walking, weaving
wind sucking extremely damaging to horses! Swallowing air can be deadly to them
bed eating may represent redirection of grazing behaviour in stabled horses without access to a high-fibre forage
attempts for the stabled horse to gain control over its environment, e.g. crib biting may reduce arousal
Less common in horses with access to large yards and visual and tactile contact with a large number of other horses
if a horse is more alone, it becomes more stressful
it is a natural instinct to be in herds despite being safe in a stable
Stable horses are also often fed with high-energy low-fibre concentrates
risk for stereotypies
Prevention of stereotypic behaviours (not the cause itself) can lead to:
The animal persisting with the activity but in a modified form
Prevention can be distressing for the animal (e.g. increased heart rate and cortisol activity)
Is stereotypic behaviour an adaptive response?
• Although these responses may be an attempt to cope with environmental deficiencies, their continued expression does not mean they are wholly successful compared with related activities that might be performed in the wild, and that the horse's welfare is ensured.
• Thus far, the evidence that stereotypic activities represent an adaptive response is appealing but circumstantial, as studies have tended to investigate horses once the behaviours have become established rather than during their development. More convincing evidence would be provided by prospective studies that followed the development of the activity and associated changes in physiological state.
Normal aggression vs abnormal aggression
Aggression depends on
environment
e.g. resource-rich area vs resource-limited
social context
e.g. is the animal fighting a more or less dominant individual
daily/seasonal variations
Conflicts are settled according to certain rules (at least in rodents)
e.g.
benefits: resources, shelter, mating
cons: injury, predation, energy cost
aggression is kept below a certain limit to minimize injuries and excessive energy loss
bites are targeted toward body parts that lack vital organs and are less exposed to infections (back and flanks in rodents)
reproductively valuable individuals are largely protected from attacks by males
If these rules are ignored, the behaviour is abnormal
e.g.
no warning/signalling to allow withdrawal
Normal aggressions are short-lived to quickly determine who the strongest is
once this is established, there is no need to fight anymore due to the cons of conflict
It is abnormal
mismatch between provocation and response
characteristic to many aggression-related pathologies from brain lesion to mental disorders (especially in humans)
disregard of species-specific rules
e.g. males attacking females or vulnerable targets
insensitivities toward the social signals of the opponent
e.g. sustaining attacks despite clear signs of submissiveness on the other side
The criteria proposed for differentiating normal from abnormal aggression in rodents
(A) Quantitatively excessive aggression
Decreased latency to attack.
Increased number of bites, persistent bursts of biting.
Intense, tissue damaging attacks.
(B) Qualitatively changed attack patterns that imply severe injuries for opponents
Deficient signalling of attack intentions by threats
Bites targeted towards vulnerable body parts of opponents
Disregarded appeasement signals
(C) Aggressive behaviour that involves excessive risks for the attacker on the short or the long term
Aggression initiated in inappropriate settings
Attacks on larger, potentially dangerous opponents.
Harmful attacks on pups and females
(D) Dysfunctional aggression is persistent and is associated with other behavioural disturbances
Attack pattern do not vanish on repeated exposure to opponents
Altered sociability, anxiety- or depression-like behaviours, etc
“SAM system” stands for
Sympathoadrenal-medullary system
SAM-system/Fight-or-flight symptoms
Rapid heart beat and breathing
Body requires more energy and oxygen to the body — increases blood flow
Pale/Flushed skin
Blood to surface areas is reduced
Blood to muscles, brain, legs, and arms is increased
= may become pale as a response
face might also alternate between pale/flushed due to the blood rushing to your brain/head
Dilated pupils
body becomes more aware of surroundings (better vision)
Trembling
muscles become tense and primed for action
tension may result in trembling/shaking
SAM pathway
Acute stressor (e.g. slipping on ice)
Amygdala is mobilized
associating sensory signals with emotions associated with fight/flight (e.g. fear, anger)
sends distress signals to the hypothalamus
Hypothalamus is alerted if the situation is appraised as potentially stressful or dangerous
activates the sympathetic nervous system (SNS)
SNS speeds up heart rate and blood pressure
activates pathways running to the adrenal medulla
Adrenal medulla (centre of the adrenal glands) releases adrenaline into the bloodstream
Adrenaline
boosts the supply of oxygen and glucose to help the body respond to stressors
stops non-emergency bodily functions (e.g. digestion)
Noradrenaline raises physiological arousal (similar to adrenaline) and helps equip the person for fight-or-flight.
Stress causes the brain (locus coeruleus) to send a signal via sympathetic neurons to the adrenal medulla. This releases adrenaline and noradrenalin into the blood, which gives us the classic fight-or-flight symptoms. Negative feedback ensures that the process is short-lasting
All of this happens within seconds
Sympathetic nervous system
Prepares the body for intense physical activity (fight/flight)

How to measure SAM activity?
Heart rate [beats/minute] & Heart rate variability
Implantable transmitters
Externally mounted non-invasive transmitters
Pupil size
Flushing
Thermal imaging — look at differences in blood flow within the individuals to see the activation of the SAM system
Heart rate variability
Measures specific changes in time (or variability) between successive heart beats
If interval is relatively constant —> low HRV
HRV decreases during stress
If interval changes —> high HRV
HRV increases during relaxing and recovering activities
Time between each beat is measured in [ms]
is called an R-R Interval or Inter-beat Interval (IBI)
Natural variations in heart rate
Varies naturally throughout the day within the same individual
Walking/Standing
Sleeping/Awake
Varies between individuals
Measurement errors (e.g. how secure are the transmitters?)
Different physiologies/health (e.g. is one of the individuals sick at the moment? Inflammation causes higher heart rate)
What brain characteristics result in higher intelligence?
Brain size (relative to body size)
consider this as the brains having better processing power
Domestication and its effect on brain size (domestication syndrome?)
Absolute brain size remains the same
Relative brain size decreases (due to larger bodies, e.g. for production)
Brain regression hypothesis:
Domesticated (less fearful) animals adaptively reduces the brain size in order to reallocate energy and resources to other traits, e.g. reproduction, production
Brain size and body size are NOT tightly constrained genetically (in chickens)
body size can increase without leading to the same increase in the brain
The cerebellum increases the most (proportionally) in domesticates
most neuron-dense brain region
important for being able to perform everyday voluntary tasks
involved in cognitive processing
Argument that brain is smaller since domesticated animals don’t have to think about finding food, avoid predators etc
Counter-argument: still need social abilities etc so absolute brain size remains the same
Ways stress can affect the brain/cognitive abilities
E.g. unpredictable light schedule in chickens
made it difficult to know when to sleep/perch, feed etc
needed more attempts to solve a spatial learning test than chickens in a 12:12 hour light schedule
Direct brain measures
MRI (or similar)
can get good info but animals may need months of practice to lie still
Electrodes
Post-mortal brain measures
Tail-biting in pigs and gene expression
Some pigs are more prone than others to bite tails/receive bites
19 genes show a different expression patterns in neutral pigs compared to biters/receivers
These genes were associated with sociability (humans, mice), novelty seeking (humans), and production traits (pigs)
Explain how brain lateralization can be used as a welfare indicator
The left/right sides of the brain process information in different ways
Left:
Well-established behaviours performed in non-stressful situations
Right:
Responds to unexpected stimuli and controls escape and other emergency responses
E.g. cows use the left eye to look at novel, fear-inducing stimuli
tells us how a novel stimuli is perceived by the cow
E.g. horses who strongly prefer viewing novel stimuli with their left eyes are more reactive than those with weaker left-eye preference or no preference
informs us about their personality (reactive vs proactive)
E.g. toads show higher avoidance responses when perceived threat approached from the left side
Teaches us that we can lower stress levels in toads by approaching from their right side
Brain lateralization in chicks
Ability to search for food among pebbles with the right eye and scan for predators with the left eye
Develops if the embryo’s right eye gets light exposure (left eye is obscured by its own body) for a few seconds/minutes a few days before hatching
Non-lateralized chicks perform more distress calls when exposed to a predator
Cognitive abilities in chickens
Can do math and geometry
Can memorize 100 human faces and other chicken individuals
Have unique personalities
Use logic/complex social tactics
Show self-control / Hold out for better rewards
Have extensive “vocabulary”
Five Domains vs Five Freedoms
Five Freedoms
Focuses on preventing bad things, e.g. pain, hunger
Five Domains
Focuses on the animal’s mental state
Adds positive things, e.g. joy, choice
Human handling of farm animals
Most common form of human handling
also mostly studied due to the economic costs of decreased production
Negative handling, despite brief and regular
increases fear of humans and stress
reduces
growth
feed conversion efficency
reproduction
health
How does the physical handling of animals affect them?
Rough handling affects their health negatively
e.g. shouting, hitting, approaching too quickly, or moving in unpredictable ways
Farm animals handled roughly associates this handling with ALL humans (observed in pigs, chicks, cattle)
This learned fear can have marked effect on the production
e.g. milk production, gentle vs aversive handling
Gentle handling — compared to rough handling in poultry:
Increases egg production
Reduces injury
Increases resistance to E. coli infection
Improves feed efficiency and growth
Note that also NO physical contact (just the presence itself) can lead to negative health effects
Especially prey animals, who may see us as predators
Can animals distinguish between different human individuals?
Pigs
Does not always distinguish between different handlers/strangers
Tend to generalize the behaviour of one handler onto all handlers
Early handling of pigs lower their stress for future general handling
Reacts differently to different people (uncertain if this is due to different behaviour or not)
Chicks
Generalize their habituation to the original handler to a similarly dressed stranger
Imprinting behaviour proves that they can distinguish between “mother” and other people
Reacts differently to different people (uncertain if this is due to different behaviour or not)
Cattle
Early handling of cattle lower their stress for future general handling
Reacts differently to different people (uncertain if this is due to different behaviour or not)
Imprinting
Precocial birds (chicken, ducks, geese…) are genetically programmed to bond with the first moving object they see between 12-36 hours after hatching
Human-Animal Interactions are affected by the following factors in humans:
Attitude
Knowledge and experience
some keepers with long-term experience may have a more aversive behaviour
Personality
patient, independent, and non-sociable may correlate with cows’ willingness to enter milking machines and reduced restlessness during milking
Anxiety levels
human fear triggers immediate defensive responses in horses, causing them to avoid human interaction
Gender
Effect of attitude on animal handling
Pigs
Proportion of negative interactions initiated
Time taken for sows to approach handler (measure of fear)
Total litter size (measure of reproductive success)
Cattle
Positive attitude correlates with positive handling, correlates with lower stress in the cows
HUEC
Behaviour(s) animal ONLY performs in the presence of humans
Tonic immobility
When flipping a chicken upside down, they may stay frozen due to a fearful response
The longer in tonic immobility, the more fearful it is considered to be
One health
The integrated health of humans and animals (and environmental health)
E.g. less fearful pigs is better welfare for both the pig and the handlers
Potential solutions to reduce negative interactions
Increased contact with humans
Particularly during rearing
Can markedly decrease the level of fearfulness of the animals
Appropriate posture and behaviour during contact
e.g. talking quietly, avoiding sudden movements, touching the animal at first approach
Use species-specific behaviours.
For example, the best places to touch animals could be determined by examining where animals groom each other.
Improvement in handling facilities
leading to easier flow of animals, would greatly reduce the amount of rough handling farm animals receive, and would likely result in tamer and less fearful animals.
A learned fear of people as a result of necessary aversive treatment can be reduced if the person doing the treatment wears special coloured clothes.
Consistency and familiarity
If negative interactions were randomly incorporated into a routine of mostly positive interactions, the animals showed virtually the same elevated level of fear as animals that received only negative interactions. Such effects on animal welfare may be due to a reduction in an animal’s sense of predictability and control
a study of Captive cheetahs showed that the regularity of husbandry routines was positively correlated with reproductive success.
Zoonotic diseases/zoonoses
Diseases shared among animals and humans
Reverse zoonosis
Transfer of pathogens from humans to animals
How to measure welfare
E.g.
Skin condition
Injuries/lesions = bad welfare
Define good animal welfare
It is an objective evaluation
although there is no consensus on how to do it objectively
Once welfare is assessed, society can integrate these biological facts with moral views
Animal welfare refers to how well an animal is coping with the conditions in which it lives
Depends on the individual level
Terminology for individual differences in behaviour
Behavioural syndrome
Suite of correlated behaviours
Not necessarily studied under stress conditions
Personality
In humans: Often includes emotional reactivity traits
In animals: Ignores emotional component
Coping styles
Include both behavioural and physiological responses to an unfavourable environment and stress
Passive coping strategy
Not equal to “doing nothing”
Includes enhanced SAM and HPA activity to the same degree as more active coping strategies
Coping strategy vs emotionality
Coping strategy: Type of response an animal makes (how it reacts)
Emotionality: Level of responsiveness to challenge
Main coping styles
Reactive
Proactive
Passive
Ambivalent

Tonic immobility
Last defensive resort
Reflexive and involuntary reaction
Elicited under the perception of overwhelming danger
Reversible, profound motor inhibition
Coping style, fearfulness, and sociality are separate traits that are not necessarily linked

Robustness vs resilience
Robustness
How much you can take before you fall down
Resilience
How long does it take you to stand up again
Variables to measure for assessing animal welfare
“Biological fitness” variables
Life expectancy and reproductive output
Physiological variables
Increased HPA activity
e.g. saliva in dogs
Note that the data collection itself may be stressful for the animal
IRT
Increase in heart rate, body surface temperature etc may be caused by both positive and negative experience, thus making them hard to interpret sometimes
Behavioural variables
Account for both internal and external conditions
eg.
Preference test
Genetics
Telomeres
Poor animal welfare can be the result of
Ill-health
Injury
Disease
Stress
Frustration
Boredom
Loneliness
Grief
Saliva sampling pros/cons
Less invasive than blood samples —> animal less stressed
Large inter-and intra-individual variation in salivary cort levels
Food particles can interfere with immunoassays
Still somewhat invasive — some dogs still don’t want the chew the stick
Fur/feather sampling pros/cons
Measures long-term stress
Variability in cort can be smaller in feathers than plasma
Potential error is larger when measuring cort in feathers
May also suffer from extraction bias + feather type/location —> speed of growth
Heart rate can be used as a measurement of welfare in the following circumstances:
Assessing stress and well-being under various housing and management conditions
Evaluating pathological conditions, training, and fitness levels (mainly horses)
Surface body temperature- Infrared thermography (IRT)
Non-invasive technique for measuring surface body temperature alterations related to stress, emotions, and pathologies
Acute physical and psychological stress and emotional arousal trigger a sympathetically mediated cutaneous vasoconstriction, causing a rapid drop in skin temperature
accompanied by a rise in core temperature, followed by a subsequent vasodilation in order to dissipate excess heat
Results in a post-stressor rise in peripheral temperature