Business Ethics Midterm

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/53

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:44 PM on 10/6/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

54 Terms

1
New cards

Define Business Ethics

the study of business situations, activities, and decisions where issues of right and wrong are addressed

2
New cards

Business ethics as an oxymoron

suggests that there are not, or cannot be, ethics in business: that business is in some way unethical or that it is at best amoral

3
New cards

Business ethics: potential for good vs. harm

Business can be a major force for good, but has equal potential to cause serious harm to people, communities, and the environment

4
New cards

Business ethics: Complex stakeholder demands

Businesses face increasingly complex ethical demands from stakeholders, requiring managers to balance these expectations with effective economic performance

5
New cards

Business ethics: pressure & trust deficit

Employees often face pressure to comprise ethical standards, contributing to a broader crisis of public trust in business leaders — studying business ethics helps address both the causes of misconduct and ways to rebuild trust

6
New cards

US approach to business

Focus on individual company-level issues — privacy, workers rights, salary issues, whistleblowing, sustainability (seen as company responsibility)

7
New cards

European approach to business

Focus on broader social/systemic issues — the ethics of capitalism and economic rationality within the overall framework of business

8
New cards

Asian approach to business

Focus on corporate governance and management accountability — particularly mismanagement and corruption (e.g., china’s strong government crackdown, including arrests/executions of corrupt officials)

9
New cards

Sustainability: “the triple bottom line”

Profit, People, Planet

10
New cards

Consequentialist ethical approach

base their decisions on outcomes

11
New cards

Deontologists ethical approach

are motivated by duties, rules, and [universal and absolute] principles

12
New cards

Jeremy Bentham (consequentialist)

founder of Utilitarianism, argued that an action is morally right when it produces the greatest possible amount of happiness for the greatest number of people

13
New cards

John Stuart Mill (consequentialist)

developed bentham’s utilitarianism by distinguishing between different qualities of pleasure, rather than only focusing on their quantity

14
New cards

Peter singer (consequentialist)

a contemporary philosopher associated with preference utilitarianism and consequentialism. he applies reasoning to issues such as poverty, animal suffering, and business ethics

15
New cards

Immanuel Kant (Deontologist)

he argued that the morality of an action depends whether it follows a moral duty or principle, rather than on its consequences. His categorical imperative states that we should act only according to principles that we could reasonable want to become universal laws

16
New cards

Christine Korsgaard (Deontologist)

she argues that human beings have duties and moral obligations based on rationality and the value of humanity, she develops ideas about moral obligation, autonomy, and human dignity

17
New cards

Importance of Business Ethics

Helps control malpractices, maintain good relationship with employees, improves customer satisfaction, improves profitability, helps earn goodwill, enables better decision making, protection of the society

18
New cards

The Stockholder (shareholder) theory

Businesses are arrangements where stockholders advance capital to managers. managers have fiduciary duty to use that capital only for the purposes the stockholders authorized. implies businesses have no social responsibilities beyond pursuing profit

19
New cards

Consequentialist version of the stockholder theory

individuals pursuing private profit in a free market are guided by the “invisible hand” to also promote the general good, making direct exhortations to social responsibility unnecessary

20
New cards

Deontological version of the stockholder theory

managers accept stockholders’ money on the condition it be used as specified. diverting it to unauthorized social goals—even well intentioned ones—breaks that agreement and spends other peoples’ money without consent

21
New cards

Friedmans logic on shareholder theory

the company exists to generate profit, that profit ultimately serves the shareholders; so, profit sits in the middle as the direct objective of the company activity

22
New cards

Freemans logic on shareholder theory

the company first generates value for its stakeholders and profit appears as a result or by-product of serving those stakeholders well, rather than as the direct goal

23
New cards

The stakeholder theory

managers should manage the business for the benefit of al stakeholders (stockholders, employees, customers, suppliers, and local community)— not just stockholders, even if this means sacrificing stockholder interests

24
New cards

Hasnas’s critique on the stakeholder theory

respect for autonomy implies no one may be forced to deal with a business without consent, and that the business must deal honestly with those it contract with— but it does not imply that all affected parties are entitled to a say in decision-making or that the firm must be managed for their benefit

25
New cards

The social contract theory

it holds that society implicitly grants businesses the right to exist in exchange for benefits to society, structured around a social welfare term (benefiting consumers and employees) and a justice term (avoiding fraude, respecting workers, not systematically worsening any groups situation)

26
New cards

How social contract theory works

Social contract theory does not start from an abstract ethical principle. instead, it uses hypothetical thought experiment, following the model of classical political philosophers

27
New cards

The social welfare term

businesses must benefit consumers and employees and avoid harming society

28
New cards

the justice term

businesses must operate within certain basic rules of justice, no deception, exploitation, treating people with dignity

29
New cards

The relationship of human rights to business

there is an intrinsic interconnection between human rights and business activity, therefore there is the notion of “accepted workplace standards”

30
New cards

The three pillars

State duty to protect, corporate responsibility to respect, access to remedy

31
New cards

State duty to protect

Governments must protect against human rights abuses within their territory or jurisdiction by third parties, including business enterprises

32
New cards

Corporate responsibility to respect

Businesses must act with due diligence to avoid infringing on the rights of others and address any negative impacts with which they are involved

33
New cards

Access to Remedy

Victims must have access to effective judicial and non-judicial grievance mechanisms

34
New cards

Nolans view: Shift in attitudes, not full resolution

societal notions of corporate responsibility have evolved significantly since friedman’s 1970 writings, but the idea that business has a responsibility to respect human rights is now widely accepted

35
New cards

Nolans view: From denial to engagement

Many companies have moved from avoidance / denial of human rights relevance to acknowledgment and active engagement with the issue and with external stakeholders

36
New cards

Nolans view: Local law and courts are insufficient

Recourse to domestic law and judicial remedies in host countries should always be an option, but in practice this often fails. laws are frequently weak and enforcement weaker still, due to corruption or institutional fragility

37
New cards

Nolans view: relying on host governments is a long-term proposition

Governments cannot be counted on, in the short term, to guarantee human rights protections on their own

38
New cards

Nolans view: A multi-stakeholder approach is required

sustained improvement requires a “multi-pronged, multi-layered, multi-stakeholder approach”, a network form of governance involving cooperation

39
New cards

How do monotheistic religions judge the morality of interest

All three religions traditionally reject the idea of interest, defining it in eminently moral terms: the exploitation of people’s need for money for profit or personal benefit

40
New cards

The interest in judaism

“nevertheless, it is important to underline that the halakha (the jewish law) prohibition to lend money with interest applies only to other jews and it allows charging interest to non-jews”

41
New cards

Interest in Judaism: modern economic needs

the establishment of israel created a need for practical solutions allowing jews to access mortgages and other bank loans

42
New cards

Interest in judaism: Heter iska

Jewish law permits interest-based lending through the heter iska, a legal arrangement that transforms a loan into a business investment, thereby avoiding the prohibition of interest

43
New cards

Interest in judaism: Interest-free alternatives

Jewish communities in Israel, the US, and elsewhere also operate free-loan societies, which provide smaller interest free loans

44
New cards

Interest in Church History

On one hand, the church fathers categorically opposed interest, decrying it as a severe sin. similarly, the middle ages carry forward this understanding of interest as the sin of usury, supplementing it with a focus on interest as a form of robbery and thus even more strongly prohibited

45
New cards

Bernardino of Siena’s view of interest

sought to develop the notion of a just return on capital. he argued that lending could contribute to economic development and help people overcome poverty by providing them with capital to start or expand a business

46
New cards

The morality of interest in modern christianity

The reformers, particularly john calvin and john wesley, followed a similar line of though, allowing interest while limiting it according to principles of justice and the common good

47
New cards

John wesley’s view on the morality of interest

emphasized that the use of money had to be governed by love of one’s neighbor and concern for the common good, rejecting forms of interest that exploited or harmed others

48
New cards

The morality of interest in islam

distinguishes between rent and interest. it tends to regard returns associated with assets, labor, trade, or risk-taking as legitimate, while considering problematic return generated simply by the passage of time on a debt

49
New cards

The notion of ‘riba’

interest is defined as money earned out of money, most normally in the form of excess money taken on an existing amount of money

50
New cards

Unresolved tension of interest in islam

in practice, islamic banking often remains connected to the conventional interest-based financial system, making the full application of islamic principles to modern banking an unresolved issue

51
New cards

Islamic banking

some scholars reject conventional interest-based banking, while others defend it as unavoidable or argue that certain forms of banking do not constitute riba. therefore developed alternatives based on rent and profit-and-loss sharing

52
New cards

Pope Leo XIII

advocated for market regulation and the rights of the working class, on the other hand he supported the right to private property and private initiative

53
New cards

The dignity of work

as john paul II notes, this view is radically different from that of the ancient pagan world, where manual labor was thought to be unfit for free men and worthy only of slaves

54
New cards

Pope John Paul II’s view on labor

for christianity, the meaning of human life is to be found in work, “work is for a man to gain his resurrection”. the dignity of work constitutes one of the inalienable rights of the human person