Chapter 4 - Audit Planning II

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/48

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

49 Terms

1
New cards

What is audit risk (AR)?

The risk of giving an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated.

2
New cards

What is an example of audit risk?

The auditor gives a clean opinion even though the statements contain a material error or fraud.

3
New cards

Can audit risk be zero?

No. The auditor plans and performs the audit to bring it down to an acceptably low level.

4
New cards

How does planning help reduce audit risk?

The auditor identifies key risks and directs more audit effort to accounts and assertions most at risk.

5
New cards

What are management assertions?

Claims about how financial statement items are recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed.

6
New cards

What is an example of an inventory existence assertion?

The inventory recorded on the balance sheet actually exists.

7
New cards

What is the audit risk formula?

AR = IR × CR × DR.

8
New cards

What makes up the risk of material misstatement (RMM)?

Inherent risk and control risk. In the audit risk model, RMM = IR × CR.

9
New cards

Where is risk of material misstatement assessed?

At the financial statement level and the assertion level.

10
New cards

What is inherent risk (IR)?

How susceptible an assertion is to material misstatement before considering internal controls.

11
New cards

What is control risk (CR)?

The risk that the client’s controls fail to prevent, or detect and correct, a material misstatement on time.

12
New cards

What is detection risk (DR)?

The risk that the auditor’s procedures miss a material misstatement that exists.

13
New cards

What is a significant risk?

A risk of material misstatement near the upper end of the inherent risk spectrum, or one another auditing standard requires the auditor to treat as significant.

14
New cards

What transaction or estimate features can increase inherent risk?

Fraud, subjective judgments, and estimates with high uncertainty or complexity.

15
New cards

What information or business changes can increase inherent risk?

Complex data processing or calculations, accounting rules open to interpretation, and major changes such as mergers or acquisitions.

16
New cards

What does the auditor look for when assessing controls for a high-risk account?

Whether the client has controls designed to address the risks for that account and its related assertions.

17
New cards

What determines how much detailed testing an account needs?

The risks in the account and its assertions, and the effectiveness of the client’s controls.

18
New cards

Which audit risk component can the auditor adjust through audit procedures?

Detection risk. More effective procedures reduce the chance of missing a material misstatement.

19
New cards

If combined IR and CR are high, what happens to acceptable DR?

It goes down. The auditor needs more persuasive evidence, typically through more detailed substantive testing.

20
New cards

If combined IR and CR are low, what happens to acceptable DR?

It can be higher. The auditor can rely less on detailed substantive procedures.

21
New cards

What makes information material?

Its misstatement or omission could influence decisions made by financial statement users.

22
New cards

Where does the auditor use materiality?

In planning, testing, and evaluating the information and misstatements in the financial statements.

23
New cards

What is qualitative materiality?

Materiality based on the nature or circumstances of an item. Even a small amount can matter.

24
New cards

What are examples of qualitative materiality factors?

Fraud, legal non-compliance, related-party transactions, and changes in accounting methods or operations.

25
New cards

What is quantitative materiality?

Materiality based on size, usually calculated by applying a percentage to a relevant benchmark.

26
New cards

What is the formula for overall materiality using a benchmark?

Overall materiality = chosen benchmark × selected percentage.

27
New cards

What materiality range does the deck give for normalized pre-tax profit?

3–7%.

28
New cards

What materiality range does the deck give for total assets?

1–3%.

29
New cards

What materiality range does the deck give for equity?

3–5%.

30
New cards

What materiality range does the deck give for revenues or expenditures?

1–3%.

31
New cards

How does the auditor choose a materiality benchmark and percentage?

Use professional judgment based on the client and what matters to financial statement users.

32
New cards

What is performance materiality?

An amount below overall materiality used to plan testing and lower the chance that uncorrected and undetected misstatements together exceed overall materiality.

33
New cards

What performance materiality range does the deck give?

60–75% of overall materiality may be appropriate. Use professional judgment.

34
New cards

How do you calculate performance materiality?

Performance materiality = overall materiality × chosen percentage. At $100,000 overall materiality and 70%, it is $70,000.

35
New cards

What is specific materiality?

A threshold for a particular balance, transaction class, or disclosure where smaller misstatements could influence users’ decisions.

36
New cards

Does higher audit risk automatically lower materiality?

No. Materiality is based on what could influence users. The auditor considers both audit risk and materiality when assessing the risk of material misstatement.

37
New cards

What does the overall audit strategy establish under CAS 300?

The audit’s scope, timing, and direction. It guides the detailed audit plan.

38
New cards

What preliminary assessments help shape the audit strategy?

Inherent risk and control risk.

39
New cards

What is a predominantly substantive approach?

An approach used when control risk is high. The auditor relies heavily on substantive tests of transactions and balances, with little or no testing of controls.

40
New cards

Under a predominantly substantive approach, must the auditor still understand controls?

Yes. CAS 315 requires the auditor to obtain an understanding of the relevant control system even when the auditor generally does little or no control testing.

41
New cards

What must the auditor consider about controls when a significant risk is identified?

Understand the controls relevant to that risk. Inadequate controls may indicate a deficiency worth reporting.

42
New cards

When does the auditor use a combined strategy?

When assessed control risk is low and acceptable detection risk is higher. The auditor combines tests of controls with substantive procedures.

43
New cards

What happens to substantive testing in a combined strategy?

It can be reduced when effective controls support reliance. Some substantive testing is still required for every client.

44
New cards

When does a combined strategy call for extensive control testing?

When the auditor plans to rely on controls and the cost of testing them is warranted.

45
New cards

What are the first two steps in the audit strategy flowchart?

Understand how transactions flow, then identify what could go wrong from initiation through recording in the general ledger.

46
New cards

After identifying what could go wrong, what does the auditor check?

Whether a control can address the risk and whether that control actually exists.

47
New cards

If a control exists and the auditor plans to rely on it, what comes next?

Test whether it operates effectively. Effective controls can reduce reliance on detailed substantive procedures.

48
New cards

What if a control is missing or ineffective?

Increase reliance on detailed substantive procedures and communicate the control weakness as appropriate.

49
New cards

Who receives reports of control weaknesses in the deck’s flowchart?

Management receives reports of control weaknesses. Those charged with governance also receive reports of significant weaknesses.