1/21
Week 1 Lecture - APA Ethics
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
enforceable standards in apa ethics
pertains only to role as a doctoral level psychologist/student
does not apply to personal life
does not apply to work doing in another facet of psychology
does not equate to legal obligation (unless crime was committed)
standard 9.01 - bases for assessment
base opinions/recommendation on info obtained from findigns
opinions/recs must be created after admisitration, scores, interpretation, and synthesized data
document efforts to clarify impact + state limitations
standard 9.02 - use of assessment
select measures that are appropriate and useful
validity/reliability of assessment must have been established for the population being used; state limittations of validity/reliability is not established
assessment measures must be appropriate for client language preference and competency
standard 9.03 - informed consent
obtain before conducting assessment unless mandated by law
explain in understandable language
obtain interpreters if needed
standard 9.04 - release of test data
raw and scaled scores, examinee responses, records, recordings, testing observations
may refrain from releasing data to client to protect them from harm or misuse/misrepresentation
standard 9.05 - test construction
if making a new test,, use appropriate psychometric properties and scientific/professional knowledge regarding standardization, test design, validation, reduction of bias, and intended use
standard 9.06 - interpretation of assessment results
take into account contextual factors and other data sources
standard 9.07 - assessment by unqualified persons
must be a trainee under direct supervision of someone trained in assessment
standard 9.08 - obsolete tests and outdated tests results
dont base assessment on intervention or decision on outdated tests
they can be used, but must discuss limitation of it being outdated
standard 9.09 - test scoring and interpretation
describe test in your interpretation (what it measures, what scoring it uses, validity/reliability)
psychologists are responsible for assessment data
standard 9.10 - explaining assessent results
provide results to the intended recipient in a way they can understand
standard 9.11 - maintain test security
responsible for maintaining test security or may lead to legal consequences and/or ethical sanctions
intelligence
generally attributes to adaptation to the environment, basic mental processes, and higher order thinking
cognitive reserves
capacity to maintain normal cogntion in the presence of brain pathology (function)
think cognition level
brain reserve
brains resillience in the presence of brain pathology (structure)
structure: the weaker the structure (due to pathology), the less cogntive reserve (cognitive level)
developmental considerations of intelligence
infant development is passive
early childhood - fund of info increases rapidly
late adolescnce/early adulthod - development of frontal lobe and exectuive functions
adulthood - fluid reasoning; short term memory and processing decline with age but long term memory shows little decline
window of plasticity
0-10/12 years old
time when brain is most malleable and characterized by rapid growth and developments
as window closes, cognitive abilities become more stable and less liekly to change
strengths of intelligence tests
predicts success in wider endeavors
reveal talents and improve educational opportunities for gifted students
provide standardized ways of comparison
measures ability to compete is society in ways that have economic and social consequences
provide profile of cognitive strengths/weakness
limitations of intelligence tests
limited understanding of intelliegence
classifies people into categorical stereotypes
knowledge of IQ may inhibit individual aspiration and affect self concept
failures to measure underlying responses (ex. guessing)
cannot capture multidimensional nature of intelligence
fail to give credit to unconventional, orginal, or novel responses
role of an evaluator
have characteristics: professional, self aware, prepared, and flexible
ability to observe: appeareance, motor skills, verbal/nonverbal, attitude, attention, and mood/affect
assess: using appropriate tests with accommodations as needed, knowing the test materials and setting up setting with materials, reading instructions
beware of expectancy efects
can indadvertly lead to forming overgeneralization
be prepared but flexible
manuals/standard test do not account for every possible nuance
how to mitigate or reduce potential expectancy effects
looks for confirmatory or divergent info
formualte alternate hypothesis
use statistical info to support/refute hypothesis
send feedback from others regarding accuracy and usefulness of acquired info