minds,machines,persons midterm1

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/76

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:18 PM on 10/9/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

77 Terms

1
New cards
Physicalism
There is nothing to reality over and above the physical; a complete physical description would be a complete description of the world.
2
New cards
Dualism
The mental is something over and above the physical, so a complete physical description would leave something out.
3
New cards
Substance dualism
The mind is a nonphysical thinking substance and the body is a physical extended substance.
4
New cards
Mind/brain identity theory
Mental states and properties are literally states and properties of physical brains.
5
New cards
Meditation I
Descartes uses radical doubt to reject anything that could possibly be mistaken and searches for something absolutely certain.
6
New cards
Dream argument
The possibility that present experience could be a dream gives Descartes reason to doubt ordinary sensory beliefs.
7
New cards
Cogito
"I think, therefore I am"; Descartes' first unshakeable certainty that he exists while thinking.
8
New cards
Thinking thing
What Descartes initially knows himself to be after the Cogito; a thing whose essential activity is thought.
9
New cards
Descartes conceivability argument
If the mind can be clearly conceived existing without the body, then it is possible for the mind to exist without the body, so mind and body are not identical.
10
New cards
Conceivable → possible bridge
The principle that whatever is genuinely conceivable is metaphysically possible.
11
New cards
Descartes divisibility argument
The body is divisible while the mind is supposedly indivisible, so by Leibniz's Law they cannot be identical.
12
New cards
Leibniz's Law
If two things are identical, they must share all the same properties; if one has a property the other lacks, they are not identical.
13
New cards
Elisabeth argument
Physical motion was understood as requiring pushing, contact, shape, and extension, but a nonphysical soul has no extension, making mind-to-body causation mysterious.
14
New cards
Mind-body interaction problem
The problem of explaining how a nonphysical mind could causally affect a physical body.
15
New cards
Pairing problem
Even if minds can affect bodies, it is unclear what makes one particular mind interact with one particular body rather than another.
16
New cards
Causal closure of the physical
The idea that physical events have sufficient physical causes.
17
New cards
Overdetermination
An effect has more than one independently sufficient cause.
18
New cards
Causal exclusion argument
If a physical event already has a sufficient physical cause, a separate mental cause seems unnecessary or excluded unless the event is overdetermined.
19
New cards
Interactionism
The view that mental events cause physical events and physical events cause mental events.
20
New cards
Epiphenomenalism
The view that physical events cause mental events, but mental events do not cause physical events.
21
New cards
Parallelism
The view that mental and physical events systematically correspond without directly causing one another.
22
New cards
Descartes response to Elisabeth
Descartes says mind, body, and mind-body union involve different basic notions, so mind-body causation should not be understood simply as body-body pushing.
23
New cards
Official Doctrine
Ryle's name for the Cartesian picture that a person consists of a physical body plus a separate nonphysical mind.
24
New cards
Ghost in the Machine
Ryle's mocking name for the Cartesian Official Doctrine.
25
New cards
Category mistake
Treating something as if it belongs to the wrong logical category or type.
26
New cards
University example
After seeing the buildings and departments of a university, asking where the university itself is as if it must be one extra building.
27
New cards
Disposition
A tendency to respond in certain ways under certain conditions even when the response is not currently happening.
28
New cards
Analytical behaviorism
The view that the meanings of mental-state terms can be analyzed in behavioral or dispositional terms.
29
New cards
Methodological behaviorism
The scientific approach of focusing psychology on publicly observable behavior.
30
New cards
Single-track disposition
A simple disposition linking one circumstance to one characteristic response.
31
New cards
Multi-track disposition
A disposition that can produce many different responses across many different situations.
32
New cards
One-to-many behavior problem
One mental state can lead to many different behaviors depending on circumstances and other mental states.
33
New cards
Many-to-one behavior problem
The same outward behavior can result from many different underlying mental states.
34
New cards
Behaviorism circularity problem
Defining one mental state behaviorally often requires mentioning other mental states, producing circular or recursive definitions.
35
New cards
Epistemology vs metaphysics
Epistemology asks how we know something; metaphysics asks what something fundamentally is.
36
New cards
Smart identity theory
Sensations and other mental states are literally brain processes rather than separate things caused by brain processes.
37
New cards
Qualitative vs numerical identity
Qualitative identity means two things share similar properties; numerical identity means they are literally one and the same thing.
38
New cards
Lightning identity
Lightning = electrical discharge; an example of an identity discovered empirically rather than known from meaning alone.
39
New cards
Morning Star / Evening Star identity
The Morning Star and Evening Star were discovered to be the same object, Venus, showing that two descriptions can refer to one thing.
40
New cards
A priori vs a posteriori
A priori knowledge comes from reasoning independently of experience; a posteriori knowledge comes through observation or empirical discovery.
41
New cards
Necessary vs contingent
A necessary truth could not have been otherwise; a contingent truth could have been otherwise.
42
New cards
After-image objection
An after-image can seem yellow or orange while a brain process is not literally yellow or orange, apparently challenging identity theory.
43
New cards
Smart response to after-image objection
Smart identifies the experience of seeming to see the colored after-image with a brain process, not a literally colored object in the brain.
44
New cards
Privacy objection
Sensations seem privately accessible while brain processes seem publicly observable, suggesting they might be different things.
45
New cards
Conceivability objection to identity theory
If a sensation without its brain process seems conceivable, one might argue that the separation is possible and therefore the two are not identical.
46
New cards
Pryor amnesiac professor example
An amnesiac Jim Pryor can imagine a situation in which he exists and Jim Pryor does not, showing that something can seem conceivable even when it is impossible.
47
New cards
Functionalism
A mental state is defined by the functional or causal role it plays rather than by the exact physical material that realizes it.
48
New cards
Functional role
A state's network of causal relations to inputs, other internal or mental states, and outputs or behavior.
49
New cards
Multiple realizability
The same mental state or functional role can be realized by different physical systems or materials.
50
New cards
Gold vs mousetrap example
Gold is identified by physical composition, especially atomic number 79, while a mousetrap is identified mainly by what function it performs.
51
New cards
Egg-protector example
What makes something an egg protector is whether it performs the protective function, not what material it is made from.
52
New cards
Coke-machine example
A machine's internal states are characterized by how inputs lead to outputs and transitions into other internal states.
53
New cards
Eiffel Tower coin-press example
A pressed Euro costs two Euros; after inserting one one-Euro coin, the machine dispenses nothing and moves into a one-Euro-credit state while waiting.
54
New cards
Machine table
A table describing how a current state plus an input determines an output and a next state.
55
New cards
Total state
A machine-table state representing the system's entire condition at a given moment.
56
New cards
Total-state problem
If a machine state represents an entire mental condition, two people both in pain may still fail to share the same total state because their other beliefs, desires, moods, and sensations differ.
57
New cards
Ramsification
Defining a whole network of interrelated states all at once through their causal relations rather than defining each term separately.
58
New cards
Belief-desire interaction
Behavior depends on combinations of mental states; for example, believing it will rain plus wanting to stay dry may lead someone to carry an umbrella.
59
New cards
Functionalism and physicalism
Functionalism is not automatically physicalism because it defines mental states by causal role rather than by one required physical substance.
60
New cards
Qualia
The what-it's-like or felt qualities of experiences; how an experience feels from the inside.
61
New cards
Nagel bat argument
Objective facts about a bat do not automatically reveal what it is like to experience the world from the bat's first-person point of view.
62
New cards
Inverted qualia
Two systems have the same functional organization and behavior but different inner qualitative experiences.
63
New cards
Absent qualia
A system has the same functional organization and behavior as a conscious system but has no qualitative experience at all.
64
New cards
Mary
Frank Jackson's scientist who knows every physical fact about color vision while living in a black-and-white environment.
65
New cards
Knowledge argument
Mary knows every physical fact before seeing color, learns something new when she sees red, so physical facts appear not to capture everything about experience.
66
New cards
Weaker functionalism
The view that functionalism may explain nonqualitative states such as beliefs and desires while qualia require some additional theory.
67
New cards
Platitude
A widely accepted common-sense claim that helps make up an ordinary theory or concept.
68
New cards
Folk psychology
Our everyday framework for explaining and predicting people using beliefs, desires, intentions, pain, fear, and other ordinary mental categories.
69
New cards
Folk theory confirmation / refinement / overturning
Science can confirm a folk claim, refine a category by making it more precise, or overturn a claim completely.
70
New cards
Analytic functionalism
The version of functionalism that defines mental states using common-sense platitudes and ordinary folk psychology.
71
New cards
Too-liberal worry
A functional theory may be so loose that strange systems satisfy the required causal organization and incorrectly count as having minds.
72
New cards
Bolivian economy example
A Block-style example used to illustrate the worry that a sufficiently complex economy might satisfy a coarse functional description without intuitively having a mind.
73
New cards
Psychofunctionalism
The version of functionalism that lets empirical cognitive psychology and science determine which functional states and roles actually matter.
74
New cards
Psychofunctionalism chauvinism worry
If scientific roles are defined too narrowly or finely, creatures with broadly similar minds but different internal organization may wrongly be classified as lacking our mental states.
75
New cards
Eliminativism
The view that some folk-psychological categories such as belief and desire may belong to a false theory and could eventually be eliminated rather than reduced.
76
New cards
Phlogiston analogy
Phlogiston is an example of a theoretical entity abandoned when the larger theory failed, illustrating how folk-psychological categories might also be eliminated if the theory behind them fails.
77
New cards
Self-refutation objection to eliminativism
The objection that someone who says beliefs do not exist still seems to believe eliminativism; the eliminativist replies that current language may use folk terms even if future science replaces them.