1/25
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
whips
responsible for knowing how many votes their party policy has
filibuster
allows minority party to delay passage of bills, requires closure vote to end (60 votes)
discharge petition
pulls a stalled bill out of committee, requires 218 votes (half majority)
power of the purse
allows for the raise of revenue through taxes and approve the spending of public/government funds
committee of the whole
allows the House to do business with 100 members ruler
rules committee
determines debate procedures on floor and heavily influenced by speaker
mandatory spending
already spent but doesn’t know how much (social security, medicare, medicaid)
discretionary spending
block, categorical grants, congress has to fight and negotiate on these spendings
congressional oversight
congress’s implied powers, congressional powers have the power to investigate and review; examine the actions of the executive branch agencies
malapprotionment
uneven distribution of population or voters across legislative districts, meaning individual votes carry unequal political weight
baker v carr
SCOTUS ruled that appointment questions are justiciable in the courts and not strictly political questions, based on the fourteenth amendments equal protection clause, led to future cases
wesberry v sanders
SCOTUS ruled US congressional districts much be roughly equal in population, based on article 1 of constitution
reynolds v sims
SCOTUS ruled state legislative district must be roughly equal in population, states cannot model their senates on the US senate rule of two per state, not about district size, about people
gerrymandering
process of altering voting districts to give one group a district numerical advantage
racial gerrymandering
represents a more difficult quandary - gave African Americans a voting district but the lines were sparking debate, can be remedied in the courts, but partisan gerrymandering is non-justiciable
shaw v reno
considered North Carolinas “I-85” district, SCOTUS prohibited districts that are so “bizarre” in shape that they must solely be based on race, SCOTUS applied a strict scrutiny standard in equal protection class of the fourteenth amendment
allen v milligan
original district lines are okay but combine districts to show no discrimination
louisiana v callas
the lines need to show that they dilute the power of black votes
delegate model
“do what I told you”
trustee model
“I don’t know - do what you think is best”
politico model
“do what you think is best, unless I don’t want to do that”pppoa
appointment
agreed arrangement to meet someone at a specific time and place, official placement of a person
bully pulpit
president sends messages to the people
judicial activism
judges make rulings based on personal political views
judicial restraint
reviewing original intent of laws