PSYC 100 Week 2 Review: Research Methods

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/45

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary practice flashcards covering research methods, operational definitions, validity, reliability, distributions, descriptive research, correlations, and experimental designs.

Last updated 1:06 AM on 9/23/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

46 Terms

1
New cards

Descriptive Research

A type of research whose main purpose is to describe what people think, feel, or do, establishing what is happening, but not why.

2
New cards

Correlational Research

A type of research whose main purpose is to measure the association between variables, establishing whether variables are related and how strongly.

3
New cards

Experimental Research

A type of research whose main purpose is to manipulate a possible cause and observe an outcome, establishing cause and effect when the study is well designed.

4
New cards

Variable

Anything that can take different values across people, situations, or time.

5
New cards

Qualitative Variable

A category or kind, such as major, occupation, or favorite food.

6
New cards

Quantitative Variable

A numerical amount, such as age, income, test score, or minutes on social media.

7
New cards

Operational Definition

A definition of an abstract concept in terms of exactly how it is measured or manipulated.

8
New cards

Reliability

Consistency of a measurement, such as when a personality test produces similar scores over time.

9
New cards

Test-Retest Reliability

Consistency of a measure across two occasions, such as when the same person receives similar scores this week and next week.

10
New cards

Inter-Rater Reliability

Agreement between observers, such as when two researchers give similar ratings of the same behavior.

11
New cards

Validity

The extent to which a measure captures what it claims to measure, such as a depression scale measuring depression rather than temporary sadness.

12
New cards

Reliability and Validity Relationship

A measure can be reliable but invalid (like a broken clock that always reads 1:00), but generally cannot be valid if it is not reliable because inconsistent measurements cannot accurately represent the intended construct.

13
New cards

Normal Distribution

A roughly symmetrical distribution in which most scores cluster near the center and fewer scores occur at the extremes; the mean, median, and mode are equal, with about 68%68\% falling within 1Ā SD1\text{ SD} and about 95%95\% falling within 2Ā SD2\text{ SD} of the mean.

14
New cards

Mean

The sum of the scores divided by the number of scores.

15
New cards

Median

The middle score after scores are arranged in order.

16
New cards

Mode

The most frequent score.

17
New cards

Range

The largest value minus the smallest value.

18
New cards

Standard Deviation

A measure of how spread out scores are around the mean, where a small SD means scores cluster closely and a large SD means greater variability.

19
New cards

Effect Size

A measure of how large a difference or relationship is; dd standardizes the mean difference as d=MeanĀ 1āˆ’MeanĀ 2SDd = \frac{\text{Mean 1} - \text{Mean 2}}{\text{SD}}.

20
New cards

Naturalistic Observation

Observing behavior without interfering, including real world observation, online behavior, or experience sampling.

21
New cards

Case Study

Examining one person or a very small number of unusual cases in depth to provide rich detail.

22
New cards

Survey

Asking people to report attitudes, experiences, or behavior.

23
New cards

Population

The entire group the researcher wants to understand.

24
New cards

Sample

The people who actually participate in the study.

25
New cards

Representative Sample

A sample that reflects important characteristics of the population.

26
New cards

Random Sample

A sample selected so every population member has an equal chance of inclusion.

27
New cards

Sampling Bias

A problem that occurs if some people are more likely to enter the sample, causing results to potentially not generalize to the population (e.g., self-selection).

28
New cards

Correlation

A statistical association between two quantitative variables where neither variable is manipulated; coefficient rr ranges from āˆ’1.00-1.00 to +1.00+1.00.

29
New cards

Positive Correlation

A correlation where the variables tend to move in the same direction.

30
New cards

Negative Correlation

A correlation where the variables tend to move in opposite directions.

31
New cards

Scatterplot

A graph where each dot represents one observation; an upward pattern indicates a positive correlation, a downward pattern indicates a negative correlation, and a diffuse pattern indicates a weaker association.

32
New cards

Causation Explanations for Correlation

If XX and YY are correlated, three possible explanations remain: 1. XX causes YY, 2. YY causes XX, or 3. A third variable causes or influences both XX and YY.

33
New cards

Appropriate Correlational Language

Non-causal phrasing such as 'is associated with', 'is related to', 'covaries with', or 'is more likely'; causal words like 'causes', 'makes', 'increases', 'decreases', 'prevents', or 'leads to' should be avoided unless design supports causation.

34
New cards

Experiment

A study with two essential features: the researcher manipulates an independent variable and randomly assigns participants to conditions.

35
New cards

Independent Variable

The variable the researcher manipulates.

36
New cards

Dependent Variable

The outcome the researcher observes or measures.

37
New cards

Experimental Group

The group that receives the treatment or focal condition.

38
New cards

Control Group

The group that provides a comparison and does not receive the focal treatment, or receives a placebo or alternative condition.

39
New cards

Random Assignment

Placing participants into conditions by chance to make groups similar before the manipulation and reduce preexisting group differences.

40
New cards

Confound

Any systematic difference between conditions other than the independent variable, making it unclear whether the IV or the extra difference caused the outcome.

41
New cards

Experimenter Expectations

A threat where researchers unintentionally treat groups differently; controlled using standardized procedures and blinding researchers to condition or hypothesis.

42
New cards

Placebo Effect

Improvement in participants because they expect improvement; controlled using a placebo comparison condition.

43
New cards

Participant Demand

When participants guess the hypothesis and alter their behavior; controlled by reducing cues, using blinding, and concealing the exact hypothesis when ethical.

44
New cards

Double-Blind Design

A study design where neither participants nor interacting experimenters know condition assignments, reducing both participant and experimenter expectancy effects.

45
New cards

Quasi-Experiment

Also known as a natural experiment; a study of existing groups or naturally occurring conditions when random assignment is impossible or unethical.

46
New cards

External Validity

The extent to which findings generalize to other people, settings, and real world conditions.