Geometry and Logic Fundamentals

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/31

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering mathematical logic, truth values, compound statements, laws of inference, conditional variants, and foundational geometric concepts.

32 Terms

1
New cards

Open Sentence

A sentence that contains a variable (for example, x+7y−12=9x + 7y - 12 = 9).

2
New cards

Statement (Closed Sentence)

A declarative sentence that is true or false but not both.

3
New cards

Negation

A statement that makes a claim opposite that of the original statement; the negation of statement pp is written symbolically as ∼p\sim p and is read 'not pp'.

4
New cards

Logically Equivalent

The relationship between two statements if each statement yields the same truth value in every possible situation.

5
New cards

Law of Double Negation

A logical law stating that the negation of the negation of a statement is logically equivalent to the original statement (∼(∼P)≡P\sim(\sim P) \equiv P).

6
New cards

Compound Statement

A statement formed by combining two or more statements, such as conjunctions and disjunctions.

7
New cards

Conjunction

A compound statement formed by inserting the word 'and' between two statements, written symbolically as p∧qp \wedge q and read as 'pp and qq', which is true only when both pp and qq are true.

8
New cards

Law of Simplification

A law of inference stating that given a true conjunction P∧QP \wedge Q, one can conclude that PP is true (or that QQ is true).

9
New cards

Disjunction

A compound statement formed by inserting the word 'or' between two statements, written symbolically as p∨qp \vee q and read as 'pp or qq', which is true when pp is true, qq is true, or both are true.

10
New cards

Law of Disjunctive Inference

A law of inference stating that given a disjunction (P∨Q)(P \vee Q) and the negation of one component (∼P\sim P), one can conclude that the other component (QQ) is true.

11
New cards

De Morgan’s Laws

Logical rules stating that the negation of a conjunction is equivalent to the disjunction of the negations (∼(p∧q)≡∼p∨∼q\sim(p \wedge q) \equiv \sim p \vee \sim q), and the negation of a disjunction is equivalent to the conjunction of the negations (∼(p∨q)≡∼p∧∼q\sim(p \vee q) \equiv \sim p \wedge \sim q).

12
New cards

Reasoning

The process based on experience and principles that leads to a conclusion.

13
New cards

Intuition

A type of reasoning consisting of a sudden insight that allows one to make a statement without any formal reasoning.

14
New cards

Induction

A type of reasoning where specific observations and experiments are used to draw a general conclusion.

15
New cards

Deduction

A type of reasoning in which the knowledge and acceptance of selected assumptions guarantee the truth of a particular conclusion.

16
New cards

Conditional Statement

A compound statement of the form 'If pp, then qq', written symbolically as p→qp \rightarrow q and read as 'if pp, then qq' or 'pp implies qq'.

17
New cards

Hypothesis

The statement immediately following the word 'if' in a conditional statement (represented by pp in the statement p→qp \rightarrow q).

18
New cards

Conclusion

The statement immediately following the word 'then' in a conditional statement (represented by qq in the statement p→qp \rightarrow q).

19
New cards

Law of Detachment (Modus Ponens)

A law of inference stating that whenever a conditional statement (p→qp \rightarrow q) and its hypothesis (pp) are true, the conclusion (qq) is also true.

20
New cards

Law of Modus Tollens

A law of inference stating that whenever a conditional statement is true (p→qp \rightarrow q) and its conclusion is false (∼q\sim q), the hypothesis is false (∼p\sim p).

21
New cards

Inverse

The conditional statement formed by negating both the hypothesis and conclusion of a given conditional statement; the inverse of p→qp \rightarrow q is ∼p→∼q\sim p \rightarrow \sim q.

22
New cards

Converse

The conditional statement formed by switching the order of the hypothesis and conclusion of a given conditional statement; the converse of p→qp \rightarrow q is q→pq \rightarrow p.

23
New cards

Contrapositive

The conditional statement formed by negating and switching the order of the hypothesis and conclusion of a given conditional statement; the contrapositive of p→qp \rightarrow q is ∼q→∼p\sim q \rightarrow \sim p.

24
New cards

Law of Contrapositive

A logical law stating that a conditional statement and its contrapositive are logically equivalent (p→q≡∼q→∼pp \rightarrow q \equiv \sim q \rightarrow \sim p).

25
New cards

Biconditional Statement

A compound statement formed by the conjunction of a conditional statement and its converse, written symbolically as p↔qp \leftrightarrow q and read 'pp if and only if qq'; it is true when pp and qq have the same truth value and false otherwise.

26
New cards

Tautology

Any symbolic statement that is always true.

27
New cards

Law of Syllogism

A law of inference stating that given two conditional statements p→qp \rightarrow q and q→rq \rightarrow r, one can conclude p→rp \rightarrow r.

28
New cards

Contradiction

A statement or compound statement that is always false.

29
New cards

Negation of a Conditional Statement

The symbolic statement ∼(p→q)\sim(p \rightarrow q), which is logically equivalent to p∧∼qp \wedge \sim q.

30
New cards

Negation of a Biconditional Statement

The symbolic statement ∼(p↔q)\sim(p \leftrightarrow q), which can be represented as (p∧∼q)∨(∼p∧q)(p \wedge \sim q) \vee (\sim p \wedge q), ∼p↔q\sim p \leftrightarrow q, or p↔∼qp \leftrightarrow \sim q.

31
New cards

Segment Addition Postulate (SAP)

A geometric postulate stating that if XX is a point on AB‾\overline{AB} and A-X-BA\text{-}X\text{-}B (XX is between AA and BB), then AX+XB=ABAX + XB = AB.

32
New cards
<p>Perpendicular Bisector Construction</p>

Perpendicular Bisector Construction

A compass-and-straightedge construction that creates a line perpendicular to segment AB‾\overline{AB} passing through its midpoint by drawing intersecting arcs of equal radius from endpoints AA and BB.