1/49
Looks like no tags are added yet.
proximal-distal axis
proximal: closest to body (shoulder/pelvic girdle)
distal: tips of digits
dorsal-ventral axis
dorsal: back of limb/hand (top of foot)
ventral: front of limb/hand (bottom of foot)
nails form on dorsal side
anterior-posterior axis
mostly looked at relative to hand/foot
anterior: thumb/big toe (digit 1)
posterior: pinky/little toe (digit 5)
limb bud morphogenesis
begins as outpouching of cells → hindlimb and forelimb buds
limb bud contains posterior lateral plate mesoderm (skeletal precursors), somite cells (muscle precursors), and overlying ectoderm
at E11 (mouse), apical ectodermal ridge becomes clearly visible
at E12: limb bud becomes paddle-shaped, indentations that will become the interdigit regions are visible
separation of digits (days 48-56 in humans)
programmed cell death (apoptosis) in interdigit region important to prevent webbing
failure → webbed digits or connected digits
limb bud formation
formed from outpouching of lateral plate mesoderm (epithelial-mesenchymal transition) at correct position along AP axis in parallel
experiments into limb bud induction and growth
1918, Detwiler and Harrison - showed removing groups of cells blocked limb bud growth
1925, Hertwig - transplanted groups of cells to new places and got a limb
1925/1933, Balinsky - showed that otic vesicle, pituitary, and olfactory sac could induce limb bud in interlimb region
1971, Rosenquist - marked groups of cells and watched were they went (fate mapping)
RA and FGF8 along AP axis
Hoxc6 gene regulates expression of RA and FGF8 → act as antagonistic signals to induce Tbx5 expression
Tbx5 (homeodomain protein) will determine position of forelimb bud
retinol dehydrogenase 10 knockout experiment
RARE (RA response element): normally present in middle of embryo, absent in mutant
FGF8: normally near heart and posterior end of embryo, regions expanded in mutant
Tbx5: normally in somites and flank region, absent from flank region in mutant → no forelimb production
FGF10 transplantation experiment in chick
forelimb bud → wing
place FGF10 bead in interlimb region → ectopic chimeric limb bud
hindlimb bud → leg
→ position along flank matters in determining limb identity
progress zone
zone of highly proliferative mesenchyme that fuels limb outgrowth (most distal end of limb bud)
zone of polarizing activity (ZPA)
molecular, not visible
located in posterior mesenchyme of limb bud
apical ectodermal ridge (AER)
formed at boundary of dorsal and ventral ectoderm
region of thickened ectoderm
required for patterning all 3 axes of the limb
removing AER inhibits PD growth of limb bud
addition of AER tissue causes digit duplication (AP patterning)
FGF8 expressed in sharp band pattern
AER activity can be replaced by FGF bead → normal wing develops
FGF8 signal from bead sufficient to result in proper growth
activity requires limb bud mesenchyme
indicates that pattern molecules also exist in limb mesenchyme
regions of limb (proximal to distal)
stylopod
zeugopod
autopod
Hox expression along trunk AP and limb PD axes
anterior → posterior = lower → higher Hox gene (3’ → 5’)
proximal → distal = lower → higher Hox gene (3’ → 5’)
Hox13 → autopod
Hox11 → zeugopod
Hox10 → stylopod
Ra-FGF gradients along limb PD axis
high RA proximal, high FGF distal
FGF → Cyp26b1 —| RA
RA → Meis1/2 —| Cyp26b1
high RA → stylopod (Meis)
high FGF/Wnts → autopod (Hox13)
moderate RA and FGF/Wnts → zeugopod (Hox11)
experiments to test RA effects on limb bud PD patterning
limb bud tips transplanted to head region, either directly or first treated with RA
earlier stage: more potential to develop into different structures → potential changes with age of progress zone
treated with RA: more structures form
experiments to text FGF/Wnt effects on limb bud PD patterning
untreated: expression of all three zones
incubated with FGF/Wnt:
Meis expressed inhibited (no RA)
slight different Hoxa11 pattern (no longer 2 distinct bands)
Hoxa13 highly expressed
Hoxa11/Hoxd11-deficient mice
loss of zeugopod structures
human homozygous HOXD13 mutation
patterns autopod region, causes polysyndactyly (fused digits)
importance of age of progress zone mesenchyme
young PZ onto old limb bud → repetition of stylopod and zeugopod regions before autopod
young PZ has potential to pattern whole limb
old PZ onto young limb bud → missing zeugopod region
old PZ can only pattern distal regions
formation of AER
pre-AER cells overlying where limb bud cells will grow out of the lateral plate mesoderm, dorsal and ventral ectoderm grow into future AER and express different genes
gene expression in dorsal and ventral domains of limb bud
Wnt7a and radical fringe (Rfrg) expressed in dorsal ectoderm
Lmx1b (Lim1) expressed in dorsal mesoderm/mesenchyme
engrailed (En-1) expressed in ventral ectoderm
En-1 —| Rfrg → AER formation
En-1 —| Wnt7a → Lmx-1 → dorsal pattern
Lmx1b knockout mouse
wildtype: footpad on ventral side, digits towards dorsal side
mutant: ventralization (footpads on both sides), digits in middle
engrailed (En-1) knockout
wildtype: nails on dorsal side
mutant: dorsalization (nails forming on both sides)
ZPA transplantation experiment
ZPA transplanted from posterior to host anterior
ectopic digits at mirror angle
distance from ZPA helps determine digit fate (type of digit)
SHH signalling in limb bud
expressed in ZPA
can replace ZPA activity
cell pellet secreting SHH → mirror image duplication of digits (same as transplanting entire ZPA)
digit precursors respond differently
digit 1 (thumb): SHH independent
digits 2 and 3: differentiation dependent on SHH concentration (paracrine)
digits 4 and 5: SHH-dependent, time-dependent (autocrine), highest exposure
signalling from ZPA
dose-dependent and long-range
must be in contact with AER for feedback loop
expresses SHH after FGF8 is expressed in AER
AER-limb mesenchyme feedback loops
regulate outgrowth of progress zone
regulating downstream targets that are important for giving rise to patterned phenotype
act to refine signalling domains of other signalling molecules
importance of limb mesenchyme identity
determines limb identity
replacing forelimb mesenchyme with hindlimb mesenchyme changes identity of limb (wing → chimeric limb)
Tbx4 and Tbx5 expression in ectopic limb buds
Tbx4: posterior
Tbx5: anterior
early Tbx5 knockout (mouse)
forelimbs don’t develop
late Tbx5 knockout (mouse, after E9.5) experiment
forelimbs are patterned normally
Cre recombinase cuts DNA at loxP sites flanking Tbx5
expression of Cre driven by Prx1 promotor (limb specific)
Cre fused to estrogen receptor ligand binding domain, so only enters nucleus when estrogen ligand is present
introduce estrogen by gavaging pregnant moms at different days
→ Tbx5 required for initial growth and outpouching, doesn’t seem to be important for later patterning
Tbx5 knockout with Tbx4 or Pitx1 expression in forelimb
Tbx5 knockout + ectopic Tbx4: rescue (normal forelimb)
Tbx5 knockout + ectopic Pitx1: no rescue (no forelimb)
→ Tbx5/4 required for forelimb/hindlimb bud initiation but not identity
→ Pitx1 not equivalent to Tbx4/5
ectopic Pitx1 misexpression in wing bud
retrovirus expressing Pitx1 injected into flank at position
expression of some hindlimb features → Pitx1 has some hindlimb patterning features
birth defects statistics
1/5 infant deaths due to birth defects (2006)
among top 5 causes of deaths between 2-18 years
2.5% live births with recognizable birth defects
embryonic period
period of development during which the organism does not resemble the adult
first 8 weeks in humans
all major organ systems are established
highest risk of defects
errors can have more fatal consequences
fetal period
period of development during which the organism resembles the adult
weeks 9-40 in humans
growth and refinement
genetic heterogeneity
similar phenotypes caused by different genes/pathways
phenotypic heterogeneity
same mutation causes different phenotypes in different individuals
genetic factors of congenital anomalies/birth defects
chromosomal (numerical and structural)
gene mutations
environmental factors of congenital anomalies/birth defects
teratogens (disruptions)
physical environment (deformations)
stochastic causes of congenital anomalies/birth defects
wild type genes, favourable environment, bad luck
protein synthesis fluctuations
dysplasia
abnormal organization of cells into tissue(s) and its morphological result(s)
deformations
caused by mechanical forces, physical environment
occur at later time points during fetal development
malformations
caused by an intrinsically abnormal developmental process
abnormal from the beginning
defect of a morphogenetic or developmental field
can be caused by mutations in signalling molecules (SHH, FGFs, BMPs) or transcription factors (Hox, Tbx)
disruptions
caused by interference of an originally normal process
cannot be inherited, genotype may predispose response of embryo
can be caused by teratogens (thalidomide)
clubfoot
limb deformation
potentially caused by oligohydramnios (low levels of amniotic fluid)
affected by environment
cramped environment due to low amniotic fluid → deformation
Holt-Oram syndrome
autosomal dominant disorder due to mutation in Tbx5, complete penetrance
upper limb anomalies, atrial septal defects in 75% of individuals
limb anomalies may be limited to thumb or more extensive
null alleles → more extensive skeletal and cardiac anomalies
missense mutations → more moderate phenotypes
thalidomide
used to treat influenza → sedative → used to treat nausea and vomiting during pregnancy
embryopathy includes limb anomalies (phocomelia or amelia), congenital heart defects, ear abnormalities, duodenal atresia, aplasia of the thumbs
effect depends on phase during which thalidomide was taken
limb disruptions occur early during limb development
limb deformations occur later during limb development