LING55AC Lecture 16 - Language Ideology and Language Subordination (Lippi-Green 2012 Chps. 4-5)

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/4

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:43 PM on 10/15/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

5 Terms

1
New cards

Standard American English (SAE)

A myth with no linguistic basis; an abstracted, idealized variety constructed and maintained by those with a vested interest in the concept, lacking any official US language academy or uniform linguistic system (like a “Unicorn” - Lippi-Green)

2
New cards

Standard Language Ideology

A bias toward an idealized, homogenous spoken language (drawn from upper-middle-class speech and modeled on written language) that establishes a false hierarchy, misinforming users that some varieties are inherently better and serving as a proxy for ethnic, class, and regional discrimination

3
New cards

The 8-Step Model of Language Subordination

  • Mystifying language (“beyond your understanding”)

  • Claiming authority (“we are the experts”)

  • Generating Misinformation (“your variety is inaccurate; mine is correct”)

  • Trivializing targeted varieties (“how funny/cute/homey”)

  • Rewarding conformers (“see how far they got”)

  • Marginalizing non-conformers (“see how deviant they are”)

  • Making explicit promises (“you will succeed”)

  • Making threats (“doors will close”)


4
New cards

Language Subordination as a Proxy

Due to tight anti-discrimination laws protecting race, religion, and gender, language and accent have become a socially acceptable excuse to publicly turn away or refuse to recognize others and their rights

5
New cards

The Communicative Burden & Language Ideology Filters

Listeners pass a speaker's accent (L1 or L2) through subjective "language ideology filters," determining whether they accept or reject the communicative burden (often refusing to understand a speaker due to social bias rather than actual lack of comprehension).