2. Employee Selection, Recruitment, and Placement

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/79

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

80 Terms

1
New cards

Job Analysis

The systematic process of collecting information about a job’s tasks, responsibilities, and requirements.

2
New cards

Job Description

A written summary of a job’s duties, responsibilities, and tasks.

3
New cards

Job Specification

A description of the qualifications needed to perform a job.

4
New cards

Task

A distinct work activity performed as part of a job.

5
New cards

Task Analysis

Identifying job tasks and the knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics needed to perform them.

6
New cards

Competency

A measurable characteristic associated with effective job performance.

7
New cards

Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, and Other Characteristics (KSAOs)

The qualifications and attributes needed to perform a job successfully.

8
New cards

Job Evaluation

Determining the relative worth of jobs within an organization.

9
New cards

Recruitment

The process of attracting qualified applicants for a position.

10
New cards

Internal Recruitment

Attracting applicants from within the organization.

11
New cards

External Recruitment

Attracting applicants from outside the organization.

12
New cards

Employee Referral

A recruitment method in which current employees recommend potential applicants.

13
New cards

Recruitment Source

The channel used to attract applicants, such as referrals, advertisements, or employment agencies.

14
New cards

Realistic Job Preview (RJP)

Providing applicants with honest information about both the positive and negative aspects of a job.

15
New cards

Employer Branding

Communicating an organization’s identity and reputation to attract potential employees.

16
New cards

Recruitment Yield Ratio

The proportion of candidates who move from one recruitment stage to the next.

17
New cards

Selection

Assessing applicants and choosing those most suitable for a job.

18
New cards

Placement

Assigning an employee to a position that fits their qualifications and organizational needs.

19
New cards

Person-Job Fit

The match between an individual’s characteristics and the requirements or rewards of a job.

20
New cards

Person-Organization Fit

The match between an individual’s values and characteristics and those of the organization.

21
New cards

Employment Interview

A selection method in which applicants answer questions about their qualifications, experiences, or behavior.

22
New cards

Structured Interview

An interview using standardized questions and consistent scoring criteria.

23
New cards

Unstructured Interview

An interview in which questions and their order may vary among applicants.

24
New cards

Situational Interview

An interview that asks applicants how they would respond to hypothetical work situations.

25
New cards

Behavioral Interview

An interview that asks applicants to describe how they handled situations in the past.

26
New cards

Structured vs. Unstructured Interview

Structured interviews standardize questions and scoring; unstructured interviews allow greater variation.

27
New cards

Situational vs. Behavioral Interview

Situational questions ask what an applicant would do; behavioral questions ask what the applicant actually did.

28
New cards

Interview Reliability

The consistency of interview ratings across raters or occasions.

29
New cards

Interview Validity

The extent to which interview results support accurate conclusions about job-related performance.

30
New cards

Reference Check

Obtaining information about an applicant from people familiar with their work or qualifications.

31
New cards

Letter of Recommendation

A written statement describing an applicant’s qualifications or suitability.

32
New cards

Biodata

Biographical information about an applicant used to help predict job-related outcomes.

33
New cards

Cognitive Ability Test

A test measuring mental abilities such as reasoning, verbal ability, or numerical ability.

34
New cards

Job Knowledge Test

A test measuring knowledge required for a particular job.

35
New cards

Work Sample Test

A test requiring applicants to perform tasks similar to those required by the job.

36
New cards

Assessment Center

A selection approach using multiple exercises and assessment methods to evaluate job-related competencies.

37
New cards

Personality Inventory

A standardized measure of personality characteristics that may be relevant to work behavior.

38
New cards

Interest Inventory

A measure of interests that can help assess occupational or career preferences.

39
New cards

Integrity Test

A test designed to assess honesty, dependability, or tendencies related to counterproductive behavior.

40
New cards

Psychomotor Ability Test

A test measuring coordination, reaction time, or abilities involving physical movement and control.

41
New cards

Physical Ability Test

A test measuring physical capabilities needed to perform a job.

42
New cards

Medical Examination

An examination used to assess whether an applicant meets legally appropriate medical requirements for a job.

43
New cards

Drug Testing

Testing for specified substances, subject to applicable law and policy.

44
New cards

Reliability

The consistency of a test’s measurements or results.

45
New cards

Test-Retest Reliability

Consistency of results when the same test is administered to the same people at different times.

46
New cards

Alternate-Forms Reliability

Consistency between different versions of a test intended to measure the same thing.

47
New cards

Internal Consistency

The degree to which items within a test measure a common construct.

48
New cards

Inter-Rater Reliability

The degree to which different evaluators provide consistent ratings.

49
New cards

Reliability vs. Validity

Reliability concerns consistency; validity concerns whether evidence supports the intended interpretation and use of scores.

50
New cards

Validity

The extent to which evidence supports the interpretation and use of test scores for a particular purpose.

51
New cards

Content Validity

The extent to which a test adequately represents important job tasks or job-related knowledge and skills.

52
New cards

Criterion-Related Validity

The extent to which test scores are related to a relevant criterion, such as job performance.

53
New cards

Predictive Validity

Criterion-related validity established by using test scores to predict a later outcome.

54
New cards

Concurrent Validity

Criterion-related validity established by comparing test scores with a criterion measured at approximately the same time.

55
New cards

Construct Validity

Evidence that a test measures the psychological characteristic or construct it is intended to measure.

56
New cards

Face Validity

The extent to which a test appears to measure what it claims to measure.

57
New cards

Content vs. Criterion-Related vs. Construct Validity

Content concerns representation of job content; criterion-related concerns relationships with outcomes; construct concerns the psychological attribute measured.

58
New cards

Criterion

An outcome or standard used to evaluate the usefulness of a selection method.

59
New cards

Criterion Contamination

A criterion includes influences unrelated to the performance it is intended to measure.

60
New cards

Criterion Deficiency

A criterion fails to include important aspects of the performance it is intended to measure.

61
New cards

Criterion-Related Validation

Examining whether selection scores are related to an appropriate job-performance criterion.

62
New cards

Cross-Validation

Testing a validity finding using a new sample to see whether the relationship holds.

63
New cards

Validity Generalization

Applying validity evidence from previous research to other settings when justified by the evidence.

64
New cards

Test Utility

The practical value of a test, considering its contribution to selection decisions and its costs.

65
New cards

Selection Utility

The value gained from using a selection method to improve hiring decisions.

66
New cards

Selection Ratio

The number of applicants hired divided by the number of applicants available.

67
New cards

Base Rate

The proportion of people who would be successful under existing conditions without the new selection method.

68
New cards

Multiple-Hurdle Selection

Applicants must pass each stage before advancing to the next stage.

69
New cards

Compensatory Selection

A high score in one area can compensate for a lower score in another area.

70
New cards

Multiple-Cutoff Selection

Applicants must meet minimum standards on several separate measures.

71
New cards

Top-Down Selection

Selecting applicants in order from the highest score downward.

72
New cards

Rule of Three

A selection approach in which decision-makers choose from the three highest-ranked qualified applicants, where the method is applicable.

73
New cards

Banding

Treating sufficiently similar test scores as equivalent within a defined score range for selection purposes.

74
New cards

Passing Score

The minimum score required to be considered qualified.

75
New cards

Selection Decision

A decision to accept, reject, or further evaluate an applicant based on available evidence.

76
New cards

Adverse Impact Ratio (Four-Fifths Rule)

A screening guideline that flags possible adverse impact when a group’s selection rate is less than 80% of the highest group’s rate; it is not a definitive legal test in every case.

77
New cards

False Positive in Selection

An applicant is selected but later fails to meet the expected performance standard.

78
New cards

False Negative in Selection

An applicant is rejected even though they would have met the expected performance standard.

79
New cards

Fairness in Selection

The extent to which selection practices are job-related, consistent, and free from unlawful discrimination.

80
New cards

Selection Cost-Effectiveness

Comparing the costs of a selection method with the value of the information or improvement it provides.