1/32
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Attractiveness Stereotype
Attractive people generally seem more agreeable, conscientious, and socially skilled than less attractive individuals, leading to positive evaluations across various dimensions
Illusory Correlation
When people estimate they’ve encountered more confirmations of association between social traits than they actually have (+ underestimate disconfirmations)
Attributions
Inferences people draw about causes of events and behavior
Internal Attribution
Ascribing causes of behavior to personal dispositions, traits, abilities, feeling
External Attributions
Ascribe causes of behavior to situational demands and environmental constraints
Actor-Observer Bias
Tendency to attribute causes of others’ behavior to internal factors but own to external ones
Fundamental Attribution Error
Observers’ bias in favor of internal attributions in explaining others’ behavior
Self-Serving Bias
Tendency to attribute success to personal factors and failure to external ones. Strengthens with time.
Stable
More permanent factor in cause
Cognitive Component
Beliefs people hold about object of attitude
Attitude
Positive/negative evaluation of object of thought
Behavioral Component
Predispositions to act in certain ways toward an object of attitude
Affective Component
Emotional feelings stimulated by object of thought
Attitude Strength
How firmly held and durable an attitude is
Attitude Ambivalence
How conflicting or not your evaluations are toward an object of thought
Attitude Accessibility
How often and quickly an attitude comes to mind
Implicit Attitudes
Covert, subconscious attitudes expressed in subtle automatic responses
Explicit Attitudes
Consciously held, readily describable attitudes
Mere Exposure Effect
Repeated exposure to a stimulus promotes greater liking of it
Evaluative Conditioning
Efforts to transfer emotion attached to an unconditioned stimulus to a new conditioned stimulus (e.g. popular actors modeling jewelry to transfer positive feelings to the jewelry)
Operant Conditioning
Social reinforcement or condemnation of attitudes expressed publicly can strengthen or weaken commitment to a viewpoint
Dissonance Theory
Inconsistency among multiple attitudes held by one person propels them in the direction of attitude change
Effort Justification
Changing attitudes toward an object of thought depending on the amount of effort related (e.g. believing something worked better than it did because it was painful)
Elaboration Likelihood Model
Durability of attitude change depends on the extent to which people think about the content of persuasive communications
Central Route
People ponder the logic and content of persuasive messages carefully. More effective in the long-term.
Peripheral Route
Persuasiveness depends on non-message factors such as the attractiveness/credibility of a source or conditioned emotional responses. Less effective in the long-term.
Normative Influence
People conform to social norms for fear of social consequences
Informational Influence
When people look to others for guidance about how to behave in ambiguous situations
Bystander Effect
People less likely to provide needed help when in groups than when alone
Diffusion of Responsibility
With responsibility divided between many people, each person feels a decreased sense of responsibility
Social Loafing
Reduction of effort by individuals when working in groups compared to when they work by themselves
Group Polarization
When group discussion strengthens group’s dominant point of view and produces a shift toward more extreme decision in that direction.
Groupthink
When members of a cohesive group emphasize concurrence at the expense of critical thinking in arriving at a decision