1/54
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What are the two thing the U.S. courts pride themselves on?
protecting the constitution from breaches by other branches (checks and balances), and protecting individual right against government/societal oppresion
How do courts differ from Congress/the president in policy making?
congress and the president address broad policy questions; courts rule on specific, narrower cases tied to individual circumstances
How can courts make public policy?
through their rulings and interpretations as cases are brought before them
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
public schools must be desegregated
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
poor criminal defendants must be provided an attorney
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
criminal suspects must be read their rights
Roe v. Wade (1973)
women have a constitutional right to abortion
McDonald v. CHicago (2010)
an individual has the right to a handgun in his or her home
Riley v. California (2014)
police may not search a cell phone without a warrant
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
same-sex couples have the right to marry in all states
Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
overturned an earlier sodomy ruling, a 6-3 decision that made national headlines
Dual court system
a judiciary made of two parallel systems: federal courts and state courts, each with trial, appellate, and highest courts
What are the three tiers found in both federal and state systems?
trial courts, appellate courts, and courts of last resort
Pro of the dual court system?
gives people more than one system to protect their rights
Con of the dual court system
different courts/laws across states and the nation can create legal complexity and inconsistent outcomes
What percentage of all cases do state courts hear?
about 90 percent
What makes a case a “federal question”?
it involves the constitution, federal laws or treaties
What makes a case involve a “federal party”?
the U.S. government is a party to the case
What is “diversity of citizenship” jurisdication?
federal cases between citizens of different states, or a U.S. citizen and a foreign citizen, with a damage claim of at least $75,000
How many U.S. district courts are there?
94
District courts
trial courts of the federal system; no district crosses state lines, and a single judge oversees each one
How many U.S. courts of appeals (circuit courts) are there?
13
Court of appeals
overseen by a rotating panel of three judges who review trial court rulings (no trials held)
How many federal judicial circuits are geographically based, and how many are in Washington, DC?
11 geographic circuits, plus 2 in DC
Stare decisis
latin for “stand by things decided”; today’s rulings rely on past precedent, and future rulings rely on today’s
Why is stare decisis important?
it gives the common law system consistency, certainty, and stability in legal interpretation
Justice Benjamin Cardozo’s point about precedent?
adherence to precedent must be the rule, not the exception, so litigants trust the justice system is even-handed
What are the four steps to becoming a federal judge?
president nominates
senate Judiciary Committee review
full senate confirms by majority vote
judge is sworn in
How long do federal judges and justices serve?
lifetime terms
Solicitor general
the lawyer who represents the federal government before the supreme court
About what fraction of solicitor general cases involve the federal government?
about two-thirds
What else can the solicitor general do besides bring cases?
intervene or comment as a third party in cases where the U.S. isn’t a party, and recommend the Court decline to hear a case
How many justices sit on the Supreme Court?
nine
How long do Supreme Courts justices serve?
lifetime terms
Name three failed Supreme Court nominations mentioned?
Robert Bork, Douglas Ginsburg, and Harriet Miers
What did FDR’s 1937 “court-packing” plan try to do?
increase the number of Supreme Court justices; it failed, and the Court has remained at nine
About what percentage of the ~10,000 cases requested each year does the Court accept?
fewer than 2%
Rule of Four
at least four of the nine justices must vote to accept a case for review
Writ of certiorari?
a petitioner’s request that the supreme court order a lower court to send uo the record of a case
What outside influences affect which cases the COurt takes?
interest groups, public opinion, media attention, and the solicitor general
Brief
a short argument explaining a party’s view of the case, filed once a case is docketed
During what months does the Court hear oral arguments?
october through april
How much time does each side get during the oral arguments?
30 minutes
Conference
a private meeting held twice a week (while in session) where justices discuss and vote on cases
In what order do justices speak during conference?
the chief justice first, then each justice in descending order of seniority, ending with the most recently appointed
Majority opinion
the published explanation of the decision that the majority of justices agree with; it sets precedent
Dissenting opinion
written by a justice who disagrees with the majority’s outcome
Concurring opinion
written by a justice who agrees with the outcome but the majority’s reasoning
Judicial activism
the belief that judges should actively defend individual rights and liberties through their rulings
Judicial restraint
the belief that judges should defer decisions to the elected branched
Besides legal philosophy, what else influences a justice’s decisions?
personal beliefs, political attitudes, and public opinions
How does the president check the judiciary?
through judicial nominations, the solicitor general’s involvement, and submitting amicus briefs
How does Congress check the judiciary?
by modifying federal court structure, accepting/rejecting nominees, rewriting laws, or starting a constitutional amendmend process
Judicial implementation
the court’s reliance on the executive branch to enforce its rulings and the legislative branch to fund them; considered the most significant check on the courts
Real world example of judicial implementation
Eisenhower sending federal troops to enforce desegregation at Little Rock in 1957 (the “Little Rock Nine”)