1/202
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Koch’s postulates
set of criteria used to establish a connection between a particular microbe and particular disease
established in 1880s by Robert Koch
challenges — Postulates assume that:
disease symptoms depend entirely on bacterium, yet host factors play huge role — asymptomatic carriage in some patients
a pathogen can be isolated rom infected animal and cultured in pure form — M. leprae, treponemo pallidum, chalmydophila pneumonia cannot be cultured.
a good animal model (or human volunteer) exists for re-inoculation: not always so
disease are caused by a single pathogen — but what about polymicrobial diseases i.e microbial shift diseases
examples of modern methods and additonal guidelines for providing evidence of cause and effect
detection of pathogen in diseased but not healthy tissue via PCR/Immunohistochemistry/ELISA — chlamydia pneumoniae
elimination of suspected pathogen from infected host should cure the disease — Helicobacter pylori
vaccination can be used to prevent infection by suspected pathogen and thus prevent disease — HPV vaccination effective against genital warts
pathogenicity
the ability of a microorganism to cause disease
infection
the successful colonization of the body by a microorganism capable of causing damage to the host i.e a pathogen
virulence
the degree of pathogenicity of a microorganism, or its relative ability to overcome host defences
virulence factor
bacterial product or strategy that contributes to the ability of the bacterium to survive in the host and/or cause infection
types of virulence factors
iron acquisition
attachment to host tissues
motility and chemotaxis
invasion of host cells
toxin production
quorum sensing
biofilm formation
secretion and delivery of bacterial virulence factors
anti-virulence antimicrobials
best model for studying human disease
human volunteer
feasible when disease is non-life threatening, treatable or vaccine preventable
serious ethical issue are involved and there are now strict regulation
Usually animal models as ‘gold standard’
animal host must be susceptible to the pathogen
infection of the animal should ideally mirror all of the disease symptoms that occur in human infections (not always possible)
must have some way to measure virulence in model
numerous ethical issues are involved and all protocols must be approved by an ethics committee
advantages of a tissue culture
cultured mammalian cells are easily controlled system to investigate host-bacterium interactions — animals complex and variable
cells grown in defined medium under reproducible conditions → improved reproducibility of results
readily visualised by microscopy/sorted by flow cytometry
cheaper and easier to maintain
limitations of tissue culture models
many genes expressed in vivo will not be expressed in culture
cultured cells lsoe normal distribution of surface antigens — pathogens may invade cultured cells derived from a tissue they do not normally infect
cells in vivo are polarised — membranes on different sides of cells contain different sets of preteins; tissue culture monolayers not differentiated
biochemical approached to identify virulence factors
bacterial protein toxins can be purified from filtered bacterial culture supernatants
filtrated processed by chromatography and fractions can be tested for toxicity
ion exchange columns — seperation based on charge
gel filtetration columns — seperation based on molecular size
amino acid sequence of a purified toxin can be determined using mass spec methods
molecular genetic approaches to identify virulence factors
identify virulence genes via cloning and expressing them in avirulent bacterial strains
very successful in some cases i.e cloning LLO haemolysin producitom from Listeria into avirulent lab strain of Bacillus
limitations of moleclar genetic approaches to identifying virulence factors
works best if only one of a few contiguos genes give desired phenotype — standard cloning isolates only fragments of genome
requires gene of interest to be expressed in E.coli or other avirulent bacterium being used
mutagenesis screening
observe a phenotype in an organism
mutagenize the organism
isolate mutants that no longer have that phenotype
work out what change(s) have occurred in the mutant’s DNA
use traditional mutagens or transposon mutagenesis (popular now)
traditional mutagens
chemicals i.e ethyl methan sulphonate (EMS) or ethidium bromide or UV irradiation
produce random mutations in any gene → may cause too many DNA changes for easy analysis
transposon mutagenesis
transposon insertion mutants are generated by nearly random insertion of a Tn into a pahtogens genome
can generate a collection or library of mutants where each mutant contains a single Tn insertion and many of these insertions disrupt a gene
resulting mutants are screened for loss of virulence
Tn’s carry a selectable marker making it easier to find the mutated gene
limitations of transposon mutagenesis
Tns can carry transcriptional terminators
insertion mutants can only be obtained for genes that are not essential for growth in vitro → otherwise the mutant would not form a colony
bacterial genes sometimes have a redundant function i.e if two homologues of a gene → knocking out one copy will not result in a mutant phenotype
iron acquisition as a bacterial virulence factor
nearly all bacteria require iron for growth
Iron deprivation is bacteriostatic — won’t grow without it
extreme iron deficiency is bactericidal — kills bacteria
Fe is central trace element in respiration and a co-factor in many enzymes
Borrelia burgdorferi uses manganese instead of iron — lacks all iron dependent enzymes → virulence is ‘iron abstinence’
transferrin
made in liver
serum protein responsible for iron transport in blood and tissue
lactoferrin
protein secreted at mucosal surfaces, found in milk, salive, tears
haemoglobin
contains heme
70% of total body iron is in red blood cells
ferritin
major protein used for intracellular iron storage
three main iron acquisition mechanisms
siderophores
direct contact
siderophores
low molecular weight compounds that chelate iron with very high affinity
best studied of bacterial iron uptakke mechanisms
wide spread among bacterial species
two main chemical types — catechols and hydroxamates
is siderophore production a bacterial virulence factor
not always
loss of ability to produce siderophores ia sometimes associated with loss of virulence (i.e shown with mutagenesis fo E.coli, Pseudomonas etc)
But Vibrio cholerae siderophore-negative mutatants are still virulent\
many non-pathogens produce siderophores
why do bacteria produce more than one siderophore
probably do different jobs in different environments or at different times during infection
i.e aerobactin and enterobactin
switching between apparently redundant iron uptake mechanisms is thought to be beneficial to bacterial survival → trading off efficiency versus cost of siderophore production
aerobactin (siderophore)
induced rapidly, early stages of infection
Fe affinity low (less efficient)
re-usable
enterobactin (siderophore)
induced slowly, when infection is established
higher Fe affinity
Non-reusable; degraded
Hemolysins
pathogen lyses erythrocytes via hemolysin
digests hemoglobin and assimilates the heme which contains iron
i.e strep pneumo associtaed with pneumolysisn → binds cholesterol in host cell membranes and disrupts them by forming pores
“systemic” e.coli produce alpha-hemolysin; faecal, non-invasive E.coli do not
exploitation of siderophores to deliver drugs into bacteria
antibiotics can be covalently linked to siderophores
following iron-scavenging → siderophore antibiotic hyrid is recognised by bacterial iron siderophore uptake pathways
shown to be successfuul for cephosporins and other antibiotics
direct contact
bacteria bind directly to host transferrin or lactoferrin
mechanism of iron uptake requires a number of membrane proteins
bacteria have specific receptors for transferrin or lactoferrin of the hosts they infect — haemophilus influenzae binds to human transferrin
at least 20 bacterial pathogens have this mechanism i.e Neisseria and Haemophilus well studied
colonisation
establishment of stable bacterial population in host
first critical step in establishment of infectious disease (for most but not all pathogens)
epithelial tissues are primary sites of colonisation
potential outcomes of colonisation
pathogen (mainly) confined to epithelial surfaces
pathogen crosses epithelial surfaces → invades deepr tissues, some may cause systemic infection
examples of pathogens confined to epithelial surfaces
Vibrio cholerae in intestinal tract → cholera
Bordetella pertussis in repiratory tract → whooping cough
examples of pathogens that cross epithelial surfaces
Salmonell enterica serover Typhi in intestinal tract → typhoid fever (systemic infection)
Legionella pneumophila in respiratory tract → legionellosis (systemic infection)
Mucous
secreted by goblet cells and subepithelial glands
inhibit bacterial colonisation
Major component — mucins (family of filamentous proteins)
mucins bind to and trap bacterial pathogens → bacteria then expelled from body by physical mechanisms (i.e flushing)
glycosyl chains of mucins
protect peptide from bacterial degradation
are receptors for bacterial surface ligands
why must bacterial pathogens attach to host tissue
overcome mechanical removal of bacterium from host by innate defences i.e flushing action of blinking, tearing, urination flushing action, etc
allow colonisation and progression to disease
often one of first critical steps in infection process
requirements of successful colonisation
avoid being trapped in mucous layer
penetrate mucous layer → reach epithelial cell surface via mobility or mucinases
adhesion to epithelial cell receptors via specialised structures = adhesins
bacterial adhesins
specialised surface structures that bind to specific host receptors
“lock and key” interactions occur between adhesins and receptors
epithelial cell receptors
glycoproteins
glycolipids
microbial adhesin binds to sugar moiety of receptor
Bacterial adhesion classes and their ligands
Fimbrial (pilus) adhesins
Chaperone-Usher pili: P pili and Type 1 pili
Type IV pili
Curli pili
Afimbrial adhesins (non-fimbrial)
Integrin and fibronectic-binding proteins
autotransporters
multi-valent adhesion molecules
afimbrial adhesins of gram negatives
often outer member proteins (OMPs)
OMPs of gram negs contribute to tighter binding following anchorage of the bacterium by pilus adhesion
i.e neisseria meningitidis
anchorage → tight adherence → invasion and transcytosis
pili (hair) / Fimbriae (fringe)
hair like protein organelles
5-7 nm diameter
0.5-several micrometer long
peritrichous or polar
varied morphology
a few to several hundred per cell
composition and structure of pili
pilus shaft/rod made of protein subunits (pilins) assembled into helical array
adhesive subunit(s) may be at pilus tip or along shaft
specialised tip structure (i.e. PapG adhesin at tip of Pap pili)
tip protein with no specialised structure
adhesive subunits along length of shaft

specialised tip structure of Pap pili
Pap F, E, K proteins form a thin fibril at the end of the pilus
PapG adhesin at tip of Pap pili, one monomer per pilus
Pap
pyelonephritis associated pili
associated with uropathogenic E.coli (UPEC)
cause UTIs (bladder, kidney infection)
fibrillae morphology
resemble pili but structure differs from pili
finer fibrous organelles 2-3nm diameter
long single multidomain protein attached at cell surface
an adhesive domain
multiple tandemly repeated domains making the ‘stalk’
found widely in Gram +ve and -ve but less well-studied than pili
well-known fibrillae of streptococcus — M protein
receptor specificity of Pap pili of UPEC (UTIs)
adhesin if PapG protein at pilus tip
receptor — globotriasylceramide (a glycosphingolipid)
gal-a1, 4-gal of receptor binds pilus tip
tissue specific as uroepithelial cells (bladder & kidney) have this receptor
receptor specificity of type 1 pili of commensals and UPEC
adhesin is FimH protein at pilus tip
receptor — mannose-containing surface glycoproteins
mannose exist on most mammalian cell types
thus adhesion is tissue non-specific: type 1 pili were often considered unrelated to E.coli pathogenesis
more recently found that UPEC strains attach to bladder epithelium via Type 1 pili — considered an important virulence factor for UPEC
chaperone-usher pili
CU pili
secreted into the periplasm by the sec transporter complex in the plasma membrane
use chaperone proteins in the periplasm to reach OM → self-assemble into pilus
most abundant type of pilus → often important virulence factors
Pap pili (pap proteins), Type I pili (Fim proteins) of E. coli
type IV pili
are assembled by large multisubunit complexes cross the whole bacterial cell envelope in a process requiring ATPase
mediate ‘twitching motility’ → requires adherence to solid surface
widespread in gram +ve and gram -ve pathogens
type IV pili of N.gonorrhoeae, Ps. aeruginosa
Curli
type of adhesive amyloid (insoluble polymeric protein stacked to form fibrils)
5-40% of species in biofilms possess adhesive amyloids
Csg proteins secreted into the periplasm by the Sec tranporter complex in the plasma membrane
CsgG forms a non-selective protein channel that allows diffusion of Csg proteins across OM
modern pilus classification
based on genetics of pilus assembly systems
based on sequence homology of genes encoding machinery required for pilus biogenesis
so far proven more useful and reliable than earlier systems
inclues CU pili, Type IV pili, Curli and F conjugative pili
Motility and flagella as bacterial virulence factors
the capacity to move towards a host surface via chemotaxis could be beneficial to a pathogen
number of cases where motility has been shown to be associated with virulene is increasing
i.e helicobacter pylori, vibrio cholerae, salmonella and campylobacter spp.
integrins
superfamily of cell adhesion receptors
transmembrane glycoproteins
always have two components: alpha and beta chains (heterodimers)
extracellular domain binds ligands
extracellular matrix proteins
act as ligands
include fibronectic, vitronectic, collagen, Iaminin
interaction of integrins with extracellular matrix proteins
triggers cytoskeleton changes via actin, controlling eukaryotic cell division, apoptosis, migration of cells, endocytosis to engulf food particle
Autotransporters
family of diverse outer membran proteins (OMPs) in many gram -ve
‘self tranport’ through OM
all share a conserved structure
Signal sequence SP directs protein to Sec system to cross the plasma membrane and enter periplasm
conserved C-terminal beta-barrel domain (anchor) inserts into OM to form pore
variable passenger domain with different functions in different spp. i.e adhesion — passes through pore; forms stalk and head structures
linker domain joins passenger and beta-barrel domains
multi-valent adhesion molecules (MAMs)
participate in high affinity binding during early stages od infection by wide range of gram negative bacteria i.e e.coli, vibrio parahaemolyticus, shigella
MAMs contain a N-terminal hydrophic region connected to 6 or 7 binding domains
bacterial flagella
majority of motile prokaryotes are motile this way → allows to navigate in their microenvironment
thread like appendages extending from the plasma membrane and cell wall
slender rigid structures (20nm across and up to 20nm long) → not straight (helical) with constant and species characteristic wavelength
filament rotation acts like propeller of a boat
flagellar arrangment
monotrichous
amphitrichous
lophotricous
peritrichous
monotrichous
single “hair”, polar flagellum
amphitrichous
“on both sides”; single flagella at opposite ends of cell
lophotrichous
“tuft”; flagella cluster at one or both ends
peritrichous
“around”; flagella spread over cell-surface
flagellar structure
similar amongst bacteria and archaea
filament
hook
basal body
filament
hollow, rigid cylinder composed of ~20000 flagellin protein molecules
synthesised by transfer of flagellin subunits through the hollow filament (spontaneous aggregation occurs)
over 40 genes (fla, fli and flg) control synthesis and motility
flagellum synthesis involves 20-30 genes
hook
composed of protein and acts as a flexible coupling between the filament and basal body
basal body
attaches flagellum to the cell
functions as the flagellum motor
consists of rings attached to a central rod
basal body of gram negative bacteria
four rings are connected to the central rod
L (lipopolysaccharide) ring
P (peptidoglycan) ring
MS (plasma membrane) ring
C ring attaches to the MS ring on the cytoplasmic side (a newer discovery, not shown in all figs)
P and L rings act like bearings
MS and C rings act as a motor — rotate within the membrane; turn the attached rod and filament
polar flagella
cells swim forward or backward by reversing flagellar rotation (CCW rotaiton pushes, CW rotation pulls the cell)
peritrichous flagella
counterclockwise rotation causes running
clockwise rotation causes tumbling (dirupts a run)
cell moves off in a new direction
flagella-mediated motility
flagellar motor can rotate very rapidly
i.e vibrio alginolyticus averages 1100 rps
in a homogenous environment
the direction of bacterial motility is random
straight runs are interspersed with tumblems that result in a random directional changes when running resumes
taxis responses
directed movement to attractants and from repellents
chemotaxis, aerotaxis, phototaxis, thermotaxis, osmotaxis, magnetotaxis
helicobactr pylori motility as bacterial virulence factors
causes inflammation of the stomach lining
linked to gastric ulcers and stomach cancer
call have tuft of 4-7 flagella - lophotrichous
flagellum-negative fla-mutants are unable to colonise gnotobiotic (germ-free) piglets’ stomachs
vibrio cholerae motility as bacterial virulence factors
infects small intestine → causing profuse watery diarrhea, vomiting, rapid dehydration, electrolyte loss
cells comma-shaped, have single polar flagellum
flagellum-negative (Fla-) mutants had reduced virulence in animal models
invasiveness
ability of a microbe to enter a host, grow and reproduce within the host and spread throughout the body
entry and survival within phagocytic cells
ability to enter non-phagocytic host cells i.e epithelial cells
collagenase
clostridium
breaks down collagen that forms connective tissues
fibrinolysin (staphylokinase)
staphylococcus
digests fibrin clots that form a mesh cover over plateley plugs at wound sites
hyaluronidase
streptococcus
depolymerises hyaluronic acid — the interstitial cement of connective tissue
DNase
clostridium, staphylococcus, streptococcus
destroys DNA, lowers viscosity of exudates/pus which enhances bacterial motility
how does invasion benefit the bacterial pathogen
provides safe environment for bacterial growth
pathogen gains nutrients from host
no competition for nutrients from other microbes
pathogen can evade host immune systemm
pathogen can avoid antibiotics
two mechanisms for invasion of non-phagocytic cells
zipper mechanism
trigger mechanism
zipper mechanism
bacterial invasins bind to host cell receptors at a number of points along the cells
actin polymerization is triggered and bacteria are surrounded by tight-fitting pseudopodia and engulfed into phagosome
trigger mechanism
bacteria inject molecules into host cell via Type III secretion apparatus
these activate changes to host cell’s actin cytoskeleton causing membrane ruffles or “splash” → leading to uptake of bacterial cell by host cell
toxin
a microbial product or component that injures another cell or organism
first bacterial virulence factors to be identified and studied in detail
there is a huge diversity in toxin propertioes and modes of action
inactivated form as vaccines (toxoids), as treatments (botox), as tool in cell biology
how are toxins classified
endotoxin
exotoxin
endotoxin
heat-stable lipid A portion of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of gram-neg bacteria, within the outer membrane
exotoxin
heat-labile protein that is usually released (secreted) from the bacterial cell
term is gradually falling out of favour, some protein toxins are not secreted but released by cell lysis.
others are injected directly as effectors from the bacterial cell into the human cell by secretion systems and bypass the extracellular fluid
adenylate cyclase
toxin of bordetella pertussis enters eukaryotic cells and produces cAMP
the cell loses abiliy to control flow of ions and also immune response is supressed
lecithinase/phospholipase C
alpha toxin of clostridium perfringens (gas gangrene) hydrolyses lecithin in mammalian cell membranes
an expanding zone of dead tissue results
how are extoxins names
named for species that produces them/disease they are associated with
named according to their enzymatic activity
named according to the host cell types they attack
how are exotoxins detected and quantitated
toxins can be assayed on appropriate transformed cell lines
limitation — cell line may not be relevant to infection in vivo
concentration of purified toxin used is often much higher than that produced during infection
toxins can be directly inoculated into animals
toxin may not necessarily cause a similar effect as in human effection
a relevant animal mode may be available
expensive method, ethical considerations
Type I toxins
bind to a host cell surface but do not enter host cell - act extracellularly
secreted proteins → massive, non-specific inflammatory response
superantigens
bind directly to MHC class II molecules on the surface of macrophages
also bind to T cell receptors that interact with MHC
many more macrophage — T cell pairs form than normal
high levels of cytokines are released by the T-cells, causing nausea, vomiting, fever
staphylococcus type I toxins
toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1) — causes toxic shock; associated with tampons
staphylococcus enterotoxins A-I: food poisoning - nausea vomiting
streptococcus pyogenes
Spe exotoxins — streptococcal toxic shock syndrome
Spe exotoxins — necrotising fasciitis
type II toxins
act on eukaryotic cell membranes and detroy their integrity
pore forming cytotoxins (PFTs)
phospholipase enzymes that damage cell membranes
many are also hemolysins and can be asayed conveniently using red blood cells
many are toxic to many cell types → ‘cytolysin’ often used