1/121
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Healthcare value equation
Value = quality relative to cost. Quality includes health outcomes and patient experience; access also matters.
Health disparity vs. health inequity
A disparity is a difference; an inequity is an unjust, avoidable difference rooted in unfair conditions.
Triple Aim
Improve population health, enhance the care experience, and reduce healthcare costs.
Quadruple Aim
The Triple Aim plus attention to provider and workforce well-being.
Quintuple Aim
Expands the aims to emphasize health equity alongside population health, care experience, costs, and workforce well-being.
“You can’t have quality without equity”
High-quality care must address unfair barriers and inequities, not only clinical outcomes.
Curb-cut effect
Designing for people facing the greatest barriers can benefit everyone.
“Race is not a risk factor. Racism is”
Structural racism and unequal social conditions can produce health inequities; race should not be treated as biological destiny.
Upstream health determinant
A structural or social condition shaping health, such as redlining, housing policy, or poverty.
Downstream health outcome
An outcome closer to the individual, such as diagnosed diabetes prevalence.
Upstream-to-downstream framework
Structural and social conditions influence environments and behaviors, which can contribute to health outcomes.
REAL data
Race, ethnicity, and language data used to identify inequities and improve health equity.
SOGI data
Sexual orientation and gender identity data.
PolicyMap
A mapping tool used to visualize and compare geographic patterns in social, economic, environmental, and health data.
Polygon layer
Area-based geographic data displayed on a map, such as census tracts or ZIP Code Tabulation Areas.
Point data
Data displayed as specific locations, which can be overlaid on shaded geographic areas.
Ecological fallacy
Assuming area-level patterns describe every individual living in that area.
Interpreting area-level maps
Say “areas with higher prevalence” rather than assuming every individual in those areas has the characteristic.
Reliable map comparison
Use consistent map scales and centers, clear legends, and cited data sources and years.
Finished PolicyMap export
Include a title, legend, description, logo, data year, and data source; export the map as a PNG.
Primary care
A community-partnered, first-contact, continuous, comprehensive, coordinated, person-centered approach to health.
Primary care vs. specialty care
Primary care is whole-person and longitudinal; specialty care is often condition-focused and episodic.
Five Cs of primary care
First-contact access, continuity, comprehensiveness, coordination, and person-centeredness.
First-contact access
Primary care is the accessible first point of contact for health needs.
Continuity
Ongoing care over time with knowledge of the patient’s history and needs.
Comprehensiveness
Addressing a broad range of health needs rather than one condition alone.
Coordination
Organizing care across clinicians, services, and settings.
Person-centeredness
Care shaped around the individual’s needs, values, preferences, and circumstances.
Benefits of primary care
Better health outcomes, prevention, immunization, counseling, and chronic disease management, with fewer avoidable hospitalizations, nonurgent ED visits, and specialist visits.
Primary care physician supply and health
Higher primary-care physician availability is associated with better outcomes, lower mortality, and longer life expectancy.
Premature mortality statistic
One additional primary care physician was associated with 1.44 fewer premature deaths per 10,000 people.
Prevention 1.0
Clinical prevention, including evidence-based screening, counseling, and preventive medications.
USPSTF
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an expert panel that issues evidence-based preventive-service recommendations.
USPSTF grades
A, B, C, D, and I, with I indicating insufficient evidence.
USPSTF A and B recommendations
Services recommended by the USPSTF that ACA plans generally must cover without cost-sharing.
Colorectal cancer screening
Can identify precancerous polyps so they can be removed before cancer develops.
Limitation of Prevention 1.0
Clinical prevention alone cannot address structural causes of health risks or all barriers that prevent people from accessing care.
Recommended care statistic
The slides report adults receive about 54% of recommended care overall
Primary-care workload estimate
A 2,500-patient panel was estimated to require 18.7 hours per day, excluding administrative work.
Nonmedical factors and health outcomes
The slides attribute 80% of health outcomes to nonmedical factors.
Prevention 2.0
Screening for individual health-related social needs and connecting patients to support and community resources.
ICD-10-CM
The U.S. clinical modification of ICD-10 used to code diagnoses in inpatient and outpatient settings.
ICD-10-PCS
A procedure classification developed by CMS for inpatient hospital procedures.
CPT and HCPCS
Coding systems used to describe procedures and services for billing.
ICD-10-CM vs. ICD-10-PCS
ICD-10-CM codes diagnoses; ICD-10-PCS codes inpatient procedures.
Z codes
ICD-10-CM codes used to document social and psychosocial circumstances that influence health or contact with health services.
Z-code range Z55–Z65
Codes covering socioeconomic and psychosocial circumstances that may affect health.
Z-code implementation in Medicare fee-for-service
The slides identify 2016 as the first implementation year.
When can a Z code be used? As a first-listed or secondary diagnosis when supported by appropriate documentation.
Documentation supporting Z codes
Clinician documentation, including information obtained through patient self-report and social-needs screening.
Z59.41
Lack of adequate food or food insecurity.
Z59.82
Transportation insecurity.
Z59.6
Low income.
Social determinants or drivers of health (SDOH)
Social conditions that positively or negatively influence health and affect everyone.
Social risk factor
A negative social influence on health that is identified through screening or patient interaction.
Health-related social need (HRSN)
A patient-identified need for support or connection to resources.
SDOH vs. social risk factor vs. HRSN
SDOH are the broader social influences; a social risk factor is a negative influence; an HRSN is a specific need the patient identifies.
Principles of social-needs screening
Empathy, respect, autonomy, trust, dignity, and open dialogue.
Potential benefits of screening and follow-through
Improved patient satisfaction, trust, health, quality of life, and potentially healthcare utilization and spending.
Barriers to social-needs screening
Time constraints, limited compensation, and clinician concerns about their role or available resources.
Healthcare hot spotting
Using data to identify high-need, high-cost patient groups and target proactive, tailored care.
HCHN
High-cost, high-needs patients who may benefit from complex care management.
Super-utilizers
A term used to describe patients with particularly high healthcare utilization and often complex medical and social needs.
Why HCHN patients often need complex care
Multiple chronic illnesses may coexist with poverty, substance use disorders, mental health challenges, housing insecurity, and social isolation.
Why fragmented fee-for-service care can fail HCHN patients
Repeated emergency visits and hospitalizations may occur without addressing underlying clinical and social needs.
Super-utilizer statistic
The slides report that approximately 5% of the U.S. population accounts for 50% of healthcare spending.
Preferred language for high-utilizing patients
“HCHN patients” or “super-utilizers” is preferable to stigmatizing labels such as “ED frequent fliers.”
Three core hot-spotting steps
Identify and risk-stratify patients, segment them into similar groups, and tailor teams and services.
Risk stratification
Estimating patient risk to identify who may benefit from different levels of care.
Risk-stratification approaches
Utilization-based, cost-based, disease-based, or combined methods.
Limitation of risk stratification
It is only as good as the data collected.
Integrated Practice Units (IPUs)
Multidisciplinary teams organized around a medical condition or specific patient needs.
Wagner’s Chronic Care Model
A framework for improving chronic disease care through coordinated clinical systems and community support.
Goal of Wagner’s Chronic Care Model
Productive interaction between an informed patient and a prepared care team.
Six elements of Wagner’s Chronic Care Model
Self-management support, delivery system redesign, decision support, clinical information systems, health-system organization, and community resources.
Camden Coalition admission criterion
At least two chronic-disease-related admissions within six months.
Early reported Camden hot-spotting results
A 40% reduction in ED visits and a 56% decrease in hospital charges.
Later Camden randomized trial
Found no difference in 180-day readmissions but a significant increase in SNAP uptake.
Interpreting hot-spotting research
Readmissions may not capture every meaningful outcome; context, population differences, and intervention design matter.
Ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs)
Conditions for which timely, effective outpatient care may prevent hospitalization.
Project ECHO complex-care criteria
Multiple chronic conditions plus recent hospital admissions or repeated ED visits, targeting people who may not be engaged in care.
Sutter Care Coordination criteria
Examples include an unplanned readmission within 30 days, two or more admissions or ED visits in a year, seven or more medications, or multiple chronic conditions.
Why use real-time data in hot spotting? To identify changing patient needs proactively and respond before a crisis leads to ED visits or hospitalization.
Dr. Jeffrey Brenner’s hot-spotting principle
Bringing good care to people can be cheaper and more effective than waiting for them to navigate access on their own.
Why might a patient repeatedly use the ED? Unmet medical and social needs, barriers to primary care, fragmented services, and a lack of trust or support may contribute.
Complex care management (CCM)
Coordinated, tailored care for patients with complex medical and social needs, delivered by multidisciplinary teams.
Essential CCM components
Tailored multidisciplinary teams, comprehensive assessment, coordination with primary care, and proactive information sharing.
Predictive modeling in CCM
Uses risk software, chronic disease criteria, utilization thresholds, referrals, and acute events to identify patients most likely to benefit.
Comprehensive health assessment
Identifies clinical, social, behavioral, and other problems that interventions may address to improve care and reduce expensive services.
Three levels of tailoring complex care
Care context; team tailored to the target population; and care plan tailored to patients’ clinical and social needs.
Tailoring the care context
Consider practice size and type, rural versus urban setting, payment arrangements, and governance.
Tailoring the care team
Match team roles and skills to the population’s clinical, cultural, linguistic, literacy, age, and geographic needs.
Tailoring the care plan
Address the target population’s clinical, social, behavioral, and occupational needs.
Patient-centered question
“What matters to you?” This helps teams understand patient priorities before establishing longer-term goals.
Building trust with patients
Use culturally and linguistically concordant care, warm handoffs, tangible improvements, reliable follow-up, and motivational interviewing.
Motivational interviewing
A supportive approach that evokes a patient’s own reasons and motivation for behavior change through listening and reflection.
Home visits
Reveal real-life barriers, medication issues, food patterns, and home conditions affecting health.
“Refrigerator biopsy”
Observing food availability and feeding patterns in the home to understand a patient’s circumstances.
Medication nonadherence
Not taking medications as prescribed, often because of practical barriers, cost, side effects, or other challenges.
Medication nonadherence statistic
The slides report that about 50% of Americans do not take chronic long-term medications as prescribed.