1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Policy Cycle (stages)
Agenda Setting
Policy Formulation
Policy legitimization
Implementation
Evaluation/policy change
Agenda Setting
Identifying the issue
Issue development and linkage
Coalition building
Policy Formulation
Bargaining
Government estimation and strategy
Formal negotiation
Policy legitimization
Mobilizing political support
Formal enactment under law
Implementation
Actual execution of policies
Carrying out the intended actions of the legislation or program.
Evaluation/policy change
Assessment of policy effectiveness and outcomes
Making necessary adjustments or modifications based on results.
Issue attention cycle
Pre-problem stage
Alarmed discovery and euphoric enthusiasm
Realizing the cost of significant progress
Gradual decline of intense public interest
Post-problem stage
Value Action Gap
Difference in people's beliefs and their actions
Six Americas
Alarmed, concerned, cautious, disengaged, doubtful, dismissive (ACDC DD)
Omnibus Bill
A proposed law that covers a range of topics, and is voted on as a single identity
Statute
Law passed in formal writing
Policy
Guiding set of rules government wants to abide by
Regulations
Rules that implement laws; specifically prescribed ways of carrying out policy
Riders
Stealth additions to legislation
Legislative Process
Bill introduced
Reviewed by committee
Voted on by the House, then the Senate, or vice versa
President approves or vetoes (veto can be overridden by ⅔ vote in Senate and House)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Founded in 1970 w/ mixed bag of responsibilities
Human health, environment, Animals, etc
Authority to:
Write regulations
Provide technical and compliance assistance to state governments
Monitor air and water quality + clean up problems
Presidential influence on Environmental Policy
Agenda: campaign and speeches
Appointment: staff and government agencies
Budget: relative priority
Legislative initiatives and vetoes
Executive orders
Limitations of Congress
Dispersed and competitive committees
Localism
Electoral cycle
Gridlock
Role of Courts
Determines who has standing
Determines which cases are ripe
Choice of standard of review
Interpreting environmental law
Choosing remedies
Supplemental Environmental Projects (SEP)
Alternative payment in the form of projects or activities for companies that have messed up the environment
Massachusetts v. EPA (2007)
Massachusetts and several other states, local governments, and environmental groups petitioned the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions (such as carbon dioxide) from new motor vehicles under Section 202(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act
Ohio Forestry Association v. Sierra Club
A challenge by the Sierra Club to a land and resource management plan for Ohio's Wayne National Forest was not ripe for judicial review.
Whitman v. American Trucking Association
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Section 109 of the Clean Air Act does not unconstitutionally delegate legislative power to the EPA, and that the EPA cannot consider economic implementation costs when setting National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NEPA
1969; first key piece of environmental impact review legislation
Requires federal agencies to consider environmental impacts of projects they perform, permit, or fund as well as look for alternatives that mitigate those impacts.
Clean Air Act
1970; Federal government sets standards, states and local government agencies assume primary responsibility for implementing them
Requirements: National air quality standards, stationary source regulation, state implementation plans, and mobile source emissions standards for cars
Clean Water Act
1972; zero discharge of pollutants by 1985; fishable and swimmable by 1983 (ambitious); only addressed point source pollution
Toxic Substance Control Act
1976; Focus is on production, not byproducts of manufacturing
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
1976; encouraging waste and recycling, most states have enacted their own legislation; only preventative, nothing to help with if an incident occurs
Endangered Species Act
1973; forbids killing, importation, or sale of species listed as endangered; Does not effectively address invasive species and Does not protect emergencies
Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill
1978; whether the ESA required courts to prevent construction of the dam; the majority of the Supreme Court ruled in favor of this, although the dissenters argued that the ESA shouldn’t apply to projects already underway.
Cod Collapse
The Atlantic Northwest cod fishery collapsed in 1992 primarily due to industrial overfishing, flawed government science, and mismanaged quotas
Antiquities Act
President could set aside land to be preserved
Pro State for Environmental Policy Arguments
States can do it better and cheaper
States can act faster
Tax incentives
Filling “Policy Gap” created by federal inaction
Anti-State for Environmental Policy Arguments
Economies of scale require a substantial federal role
States will “race to the bottom” to compete for business
Pollution knows no boundaries; there will be spillovers across state borders
1946 Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
Federal statute governs how administrative agencies propose/establish regulations.
Sets up process for federal courts to directly review agency decisions
Policy Cycle: NGO Influence
Expert advice and analysis
Mobilizing public opinion
Representing the voiceless
Providing a service to government
Monitoring and assessing
“Idle No More”
Indigenous movement in Canada to show that their opinions are important in environmental decision-making and they need to be consulted
Dakota Access Pipeline Case Study
The government was building a pipeline above reservation land. The reservation was against it and protested because it went under their water source and could contaminate water
Kivalina
The tribe living off the coast of Alaska's island is shrinking because of climate change.
They tried to sue companies for climate change but didnt have standing
They are now moving to the mainland
“Treatment as State” Requirements
A tribe must be recognized as a federally recognized tribe
Must have a functional tribal government responsible for health and welfare
Demonstrate that they can perform regulatory functions
Capable of administering regulations