1/112
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Executive branch & AFP
President and executive agency
Department of State
(Marco Rubio) Carries out president’s diplomacy and foreign policy
Department of Defense
(Pete Hegseth) carries out president’s military policy
CIA (central intelligence agency)
(John Ratcliffe) Gathers intelligence about foreign policy activity
Secretary of state
(Marco Rubio) Heads the US state department often represents the president abroad. Helps develop/carry out foreign policy state department deals with regions/issues around the world
US foreign service
Diplomatic corps attached to the state department. Includes ambassadors, consults, and other specialists.
Ambassadors (US foreign service)
Represent US political interest in other countries
Consults
represent US business/economic interest
other specialists
technical issues/foreign policy aid
legislative branch
congress has the most foreign powers including setting tariffs/duties regulating foreign commerce regulating immigration power to declare war immigration quotas determines which countries receive most favored nation trade status votes on foreign aid as well as sets defense budget.
congress and the president
congress often accepts changes and rejects policies proposed by the president
Senate approves…
treaties and ambassadors
The president ultimately leads foreign policy but congress has major constitutional powers that
limit the president needs 2/3 votes once approved. treaties = federal binding law
Missouri v. Holland
SCOTUS ruled that the federal government treaty making power is separate from its other enumerated powers
Why is missouri v. holland important
federal government can use treaties to legislate in areas that normally would belong to the states
important congressional committees
senate, foreign relations, armed services, and HLS and gov affairs
important congressional committees house
foreign affairs, HLS, and armed services
Judicial branch
SCOTUS has limited role in AFP. they have jurisdiction over treaties, admiralty and maritime law, ambassadors/other public ministers
disagreement between branches
can be conflict between the president and congress over AFP
example: Woodrow Wilson and the league of nations
supported LON after ww1
senate opposed it and refused to ratify
shows the president cannot always get the foreign policy he wants
War power conflict…
Constitution: Congress declares war
President: commander in chief
however, presidents have committed US forces to major conflicts without a formal declaration of war
Other foreign influences in foreign policy
foreign policy isn't controlled by government branches
political parties influence foreign policy positions and debate
Interest group types
economic/business
ethnic
human rights
environmental
frame issues
provide info/analysis
monitor government policy
react to gov decisions
lobby officials
Foreign country adovcacy groups
try to influence congress and the president
AIPAC/pro Israel advocacy
Greek American lobby
Armenian American lobby
Cuban American lobby
public and media
public opinion can influence FP
media can influence how people understand fp issues
people may organize
protests
political action
advocacy campaigns
Instruments and tools of AFP
diplomacy
economic power
international organizations
treaties alliances
international arbitration
Diplomacy
Representation of a government to other governments to promote national values or interests through peaceful means.
US diplomatic developments
the rogers act of 1924 and foreign service act of 1946
Rogers act of 1924
established the initial framework for a professional US foreign service
foreign service act of 1946
helped create a more professionalized diplomatic corps after WWII
presidents sometimes don't want to rely heavily on state department diplomats because…
the president is ultimately responsible for foreign policy success and failure
United Nations (UN)
founded in 1945. provides a way for countries to negotiate and discuss international problems. Settle disputes peacefully and take multilateral action
General assembly
supreme body of the US 193 member states each one has a representative
Security council
acts as UN’s executive committee US is a permanent member. International discussion negotiation, peaceful dispute settlement
World bank
Bretton Woods conference 1944 stabilize the world economic focuses on, developing countries, reducing poverty, increasing shared prosperity, financing, policy advice, technical assistance, and strengthening private sectors development and poverty
IMF (international monetary fund)
stabilizing the international monetary system
monitoring global member economies
lending to countries with balance of payment problems
providing practical economic assistance
monetary/economic stability
economic aid and sanctions
the US influence other countries economically through economic aid and economic sanctions
economic aid and sanctions
the US can influence other countries economically through economic aid and economic sanctions
economic aid
gives countries resources and incentives encouraging desired behavior
economic sanctions
punish/discourage undesirable behavior. creates disincentives
Why did the US abandon isolationism after ww2?
-Europe was devastated after ww2
-American leaders decided the us needed to remain involved internationally
-soviet union emerged as major ideology and security threat
How did the US take a global leadership role?
US came out of ww2 extremely powerful economically and militarily
had a booming economy with troops stationed abroad
huge navy (only country with atomic bomb)
europe weak + US strong + ussr rising
FDR's post war plan
Did not want isolationism... instead
completely defeat disarm aggressor countries
support self-determination
prevent another global economic depression
create global collective security org.
keep major allied powers cooperating post ww2
FDR imagined (US, Britain, USSR, and China) maintaining world order together similar to the balance of pwr concept
Yalta conference
a conference between Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill
(met to discuss end of ww2 and post war world)
Germany divided in occupation zones
USSR received territorial concessions
Poland's post war situation was discussed
liberated European countries supposed to have free elections
USSR agreed to war against Japan
Agreements were reached concerning the UN
What does the Yalta conference show?
shows that the US was already committing itself to involvement in post war Europe and international politics
Liberal international order
U.S. wasn't just creating new military/security system
also an economic one as well
Bretton woods conference of 1944 created...
IMF, the world bank and the GATT
IMF
helps stabilize international monetary relations and assists countries with balance of payment problems
World bank
originally designed to help reconstruction after ww2 and later development
General Agreement on tariffs (GATT)
encouraged more important international trade
Post war American global leadership & economy
US dollar became principle reserve currency
security and economics (US helped construct a rule-based liberal international order with itself in the center)
US soviet relations fall apart
Initially Roosevelt believed that the US could cooperate with the soviet union
Yalta view- USSR acts as a normal great power concerned with power and security
Riga Axioms
soviet union fundamentally motivated by communist ideology (wanted to expand influence)
Stalin v Churchill (stalin perspective)
1946
stalin speech attacking capitalism
discussing capitalism conflict in system
Reinforced that Europe was dividing into two opposite camps
Churchill perspective
iron curtain had fallen across europe
western europe under U.S. western influence
Eastern Europe soviet influence and control
Truman doctrine
1947
Britain told the US it could no longer financially support Greece and Turkey
Truman asked congress for 400 mill. to support them
Importance went way beyond Greece and Turkey
Essentially announced: US would support "free peoples" resisting totalitarian and communist threats
Importance of truman doctrine
marked America's containment to fighting communist expansion globally
clearest starting point of the cold war
Containment
prevent communism and soviet influence from expanding
Kennan argued for "long term, patient but firm and vigilant containment"
Stop soviet expansion while putting pressure in the USSR to eventually weaken/stop soviet pwr
Containment led...
US leaders to develop military, political, and economic ways of containing communism around the world
Military containment alliances
NATO (US, Canada, Western European countries)
SEATO
CENTO
ANZUS
NATO article 5
an attack against one nato member is an attack against all
became most important containment alliance because Europe was the primary area where soviet aggression may occur
Eisenhower Doctrine
containment expands into the middle east
Eisenhower said the US could provide economic and military assistance/potentially to military force countries threatened by international communism
Containment becomes global
Marshall plan 1947
Secretary of state George C. Marshall
provided massive economic assistance to rebuild western Europe
(another method of containment)
Economically healthy Europe would help the US and global economy
rebuild Europe, create stability, and reduce communism
Politically poor unstable Countries were more susceptible to communism.
Truman's 14 points
Wanted to expand development assistance beyond Europe (undeveloped countries)
Point four: technological assistance, industrial assistance, and economic assistance.
Marshall plan---mostly western Europe----point four----developing world/global assistance
Mutual security
US foreign aid became increasingly focused on security aside from the economy
Strengthen countries to resist communism
more military aid to US allies
1950s Military assistance major part of US foreign aid
NC68
1950
major national security document portrayed cold war as a fundamental struggle
Argued that the US needed massive increase in political, economic, and military strength
US (freedom)
Soviet (oppression/communist expansion)
NC68 goals
more military spending
stronger armed forces
nuclear capabilities
aid to allies
domestic support for containment
militarized containment
Domestic cold war
cold war-international communism inside America
Foreign policy disagreement because people accused of "soft on communism"
This contributed to
investigations
loyalty oaths
FBI/CIA surveillance
House un-American activities
fear of communist infiltration/Mccarthyism
Mcarthyism
Public acusations of disloyalty made with little or no regard to actual evidence. Named after senator Joseph Mcarhy these accusations and the scandal and harm the caused came to symbolize the most virulent form of anticommunism.
Korean war (1st test of containment)
extremely important after ww2
NK- Communist influence/soviet
SK- US/western
June 25th 1950, NK invaded SK
US viewed invasion as part of communist expansion (responded militarily)
China enters Korean war
General Douglass Mcarther pushed back NK forces back and moved to the chinese border
China warned US to not approach
US continued chinese troops entered and pushed US back
Truman v Mccarther (Mccarther)
wanted to expand war into china
win war, even if it meant attacking them
Truman v Mccarther (truman)
disagreed with administration policy
wanted to contain communism without starting much bigger war
wanted a limited war not a large one involving soviets
fired Mccarther for insubordination
How did the Korean war strengthen containment
US military spending increased
NATO became more militarized
US maintained large armed forces
US more willing to confront communist aggression
US increasingly saw China USsr as communist bloc
More alliances in asia
NC-68 recc. implemented
Cold war consensus
Late 1940s-1960s
US leaders/much of the public agreed on basic cold war worldview
Free world and communist world
US suspicious of political change
During cold war US leaders often feared revolutions and political instability
Change: commies gain interest
soviet power expands
STABILITY overall
US didn't even oppose authoritarian regimes because they also were anti communist
Munich syndrome
cold war leaders worried that failing to stop communism in one country would encourage it elsewhere
US leaders remembered how Britan/France appeased Hitler between WW2
Don't appease aggressors, confront them early
US as a model
Model for developing countries
US capatalism
technology
democracy
development/prosperity
Tried helping poorer countries to modernize
paternalistic
Challenges to cold war consensus
US vs USSr
became harder to mantain
international system became more complicated
3 developments changed cold war consensus
SINO soviet split
Division among allikes
Nonaligned
SINO soviet split
china and USSR began fighting
Division among allies
countries within both western and communist blocs developed their own interest
Nonaligned
mainly newly developed countries did not want to choose
multipolar v bipolar
WW2 brief
(1939–1945): Global war between the Axis Powers (Germany, Italy, Japan) and the Allies (U.S., Britain, Soviet Union, etc.).
The U.S. entered in 1941 after Pearl Harbor. The Allies defeated the Axis in 1945.
After the war, the U.S. and USSR emerged as the two superpowers, but they had very different political/economic systems, setting up the Cold War
Cold War brief
(c. 1947–1991): Long-term rivalry between the U.S. and Soviet Union.
It was mainly a conflict between capitalism/democracy and communism, fought through political, economic, military, and ideological competition rather than direct war between the two superpowers. U.S. policy centered on containment—preventing the spread of communism.
Time line WW2-cold war
1939 → WWII begins in Europe
1941 → Pearl Harbor → U.S. enters WWII
1945 → WWII ends → U.S. & USSR emerge as superpowers
1947 → Truman Doctrine + Containment → Cold War begins
1949 → USSR gets atomic bomb; NATO created; China becomes communist
1950–1953 → Korean War → containment becomes militarized
1955 → Warsaw Pact created
1957 → USSR launches Sputnik1961 → Bay of Pigs + Berlin Wall
Cuban missel crisis 1962
USSR placed nuclear missiles in Cuba, 90 miles from the US
Kennedy responds with naval quarantine
resolution
USSR removes missiles from cuba
US promised not to involve cuba
Secretely US removed missiles from turkey
Closest US and USSR came to nuclear war
Lessons from Cuban missile crisis
MAP--- nuclear war could destroy both sides (survival is greater than total victory)
USSR=could rationally act/negotiate
accommodation/co-existence with USSR was necessary led to Detente
Chapter three gist
cold war consensus begins to collapse after
cuban missile crisis (1962) dangers of nuclear confrontation
vietnam war damaged trust in US foreign policy
NIXON----realism
CARTER----- liberalism shifts toward realism
Chapter two main gist
after ww2, the US decided it could no longer stay out of world affairs, perceived threats from the soviet union and communism led to containment (stop communism from spreading)
Isolationism equals gradualism
Why the US became so involved in the Vietnam war?
containment
Domino theory-If Vietnam became communist, other southeast Asian countries might follow.
US grew from Truman---Eisenhower-Kennedy---Johnson
Escalation
Kennedy increased advisers from 685----16,000
Johnson- Gulf of Tonkin resolution (1964) gave authority to expand war
Operation rolling through thunder (1965)-major bombing campaign to US ground troops
1968---500,000 plus US troops
Tet offensive 1968
Military: North Vietnam/ Vietcong failed
political major success because it showed enemy is still strong
US confidence in war collapsed---led Johnson not to re-elect
Nixon and Vietnamization
gradually replace US troops with South Vietnamese forces
US forces fell from 500,000---25,000
Nixon expanded fighting into Cambodia, increasing protests
1973 US fell
1975 Saigon fell-communist north Vietnam won
58,000 Americans died
Why the US lost
poor strategy for this type of war
limited war/search and destroy tatics
Weak south Vietnamese government
strong North Vietnamese determination
American public and congress lost support
Major consequences of Vietnam
limited US power
America can't solve every global power
Vietnam syndrome
fear/hesitation about entering another long costly war
More public debate
Hawks v doves
greater criticism of FP
Cold war consensus collapsed
Americans still saw communism as a threat but became less willing to fight it everywhere
Realism
power
national interest
balance of power
military and security
stability
Nixon and Kissinger
"What protects American power and interests"
Liberalim
values
human/global interest
cooperation
political, economic, and Social issues
improving world
president carter
"how can cooperation and values improve the world"
Nixon and Kissingers realism
US should have a more limited global role after Vietnam
focus on balance of power among major powers
US, USSR, china, western Europe, and Japan
Partnership--- allies share responsibility
Strength US maintains military power
Negotiate even with enemies
Kissinger realism
major advocate of realism
goal-stability not spreading democracy
balance of power (more important than morality)
Linkage---actions in one are can affect relations in another
Detente
Relaxation of the US---soviet tensions
compete when necessary, cooperate when possible
SALT i (1972) limited nuclear weapons Nixon visits China (1972) improved US china relations/help balance USSR
Helsink: accords 1975 cooperation/security in Europe