1/49
Looks like no tags are added yet.
what is transdental idealism (Kant)
German idealization
what is noumena (Kant)
can’t see, no perception, object in itself (“I” or free will)
what is phenomena (Kant)
appearances and perceptions of worldly things
what is apriori (Kant)
prior to experience
what is aposteriori (Kant)
after experience
is kant a consequentialist
no
who should be happy (Kant)
anyone doing their duty in pure good will, if the person doesn’t have good will the goal doesn’t matter / can’t be reached
what practical theory does Kant have
deontological
what is deontological practical theory (Kant)
= duty
-if you tried to do your duty even if you mess up, you will have good will
-the effects aren’t what makes something good, only actions
-you can’t truly know if someone has good will, they could be evil but still do something virtuously
what does Kant say about happiness being the goal
if happiness was our goal, we would have different instincts, but we have the capacity to think
what are Kants 4 relationships of will to duty
all actions against duty
actions done for some good down the line, but you wouldn’t do the action otherwise bc you don’t desire to do that
actions you want to do that accord with duty
actions you don’t want to do but accord with duty, ought to be done in themselves
what must be ignored to have good will (Kant)
inclination to reach our goals
what is the first categorical imperative (Kant)
I should never act except in such a way that my maximum could be willed into a universal law (of nature)
what is the second categorical imperative (Kant)
don’t treat someone simply as a means, but also at the same time as an end
what is the third categorical imperative (Kant)
Act in accordance with the maxims of a member giving universal laws for a merely possible kingdom of ends
what is the fourth categorical imperative (Kant)
Act according to your own rational will, giving yourself the moral law rather than being controlled by external influences, desires, or rewards
what is empirical (Kant)
everything we can see… we can’t know that someone isn’t a robot bc we can’t see their thoughts
what are the categorical imperatives (Kant)
good willing and you have to do it (nothing imperial / material)
are moral concepts apriori or aposteriori (Kant)
apriori… you know what is right or wrong (killing children wrong)
is the hypothetical imperative apriori or aposteriori (Kant)
aposteriori (if __ then __)
what is transdental idealation (Kant)
treat all people’s wills as good wills, regardless of the person
what is clear conviction (Kant)
even if you’ve never experienced a true friend, you ought to be one —> treat others as free people
what is God (Kant)
He is the moral order, not necessitative
what is Jesus (Kant)
phenomenal
what are the perfect duties to ourselves and others (Kant)
don’t kys and don’t lie
what are perfect duties (Kant)
illogical if you counter duty and it destroys nature
what are the imperfect duties to ourselves and others (Kant)
develop your talents and be benelovent
what are imperfect duties (Kant)
harmonizes with reason but not illogical or destroys nature
what distinguishes btw good and bad (Kant)
freedom of desires
what makes freedom rational (Kant)
you produce duties by taking maxim and putting it through categorical imperative
summarize both versions of first categorical imperative (Kant)
will this effect society, will this effect nature as we know it
what must you be to be good willing (Kant)
self legislating
is the moral person incontinent (Kant)
no
what is mundis intelligibilis (Kant)
intelligible world
all action is for … (mill)
the sake of some end
what is teleological (mill)
means to ends
what does mill say about Kant
that Kant was only concerned about consequences (global warming ex, jumping on bomb ex)
what is the creed (mill)
GHP, actions are right in proportion that they tend to promote happiness wrong as they promote the opposite of happiness. Happiness is the presence of pleasure and absence of pain. Unhappiness is the presence of pain and privation of pleasure
what are 3 objections and replies (mill)
Utilitarianism is Godless → God wants us to be happy, motive doesn’t matter → end goal matters (aim and consequences), lying is expedient → consider consequences (if you want happiness just try your best)
what is the ultimate sanction (mill)
we have a profound sense of e/o’s wellbeing
what does our conscience extend to (mill)
the wellbeing of others
what is the internal sanction (mill)
conscience, feeling of remorse from doing wrong → built from childhood, moral sentiment
what is the external sanction (mill)
hope of receiving a favor or fear of displeasure from authority
what is a sanction (mill)
sense of obligation
can virtue be a part of happiness (mill)
yes (money and fame)
what is the relationship between will and desire (mill)
will stars off as the child of desire, but then will becomes habituated against desire
what is the biggest issue in utilitarianism
justice and punishment
what is justice (mill)
resentment moralized by being made co-existive w good (feeling)
what are the two kinds of universals
kingdom of ends
end in e of us… our free willing
highest good w/o qualification = good will
collective
end determined by social feelings of mankind (GHP)
highest good w/o qualification = highest happiness
what do both kinds of the universal lead to
the golden rule