1/100
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Hermann Ebbinghaus
Used himself as test subject to study forgetting and memory retention through experiments on syllables.
Nonsense syllables
Information capacity
Learning curve
Forgetting curve
Nonsense Syllables
Meaningless 3 letter combos (DAX, BOM) to test memory w/o past experiences interfering
Information Capacity
Ppl can remember 7+-2 terms on a list after reading it
Learning Curve
Learning is slow when first learning a new skill but gets faster with more experience
Forgetting Curve
Memory loss happens quickly after learning then levels over time, combat with active recall
Free Recall Test
Ebbinghaus’ test, remembering lists of three-letter syllables with no assistance
Cued Recall Tests
Recall tests that give cues to information. Ex. Naming the 50 states with a outline map of the US
Recognition Tests
Recall tests that give options to recognize (MCQ questions, 7 dwarves)
Saving Tests
Recall tests; if you forgot something you learned in the past, you’ll relearn it faster than people learning it for the first time
Implicit Memory Tests
Recall tests where you’re primed with the answer
Anterograde Amnesia
Inability to form new memories; despite not remembering doing a task, they improve with repition
3 Steps to Memory
Encoding, storage, retrieval
Encoding
Processing sensory information into recallable data, or moving short to long-term memory
Storage
Storing sensory memory as either short or long-term memory
Retrieval
Moving long to short term memory to bring to conscious memory, using retrieval cues like recall
Temporal Memory
How brain encodes, organizes, and retrieves memory through 3 stages of memory processing
Sensory Memory
Memory of stimuli that lasts a second, important ___ memory gets encoded into short term memory
Short-term Memory
Memory that lasts between 10 secs-few days, 7+-2 items, either forgotten or placed into long-term memory, only relevant info
Long-term Memory
Memories from short-term memory that’s important, subject to distortions and fabrications, debate if it’s ever forgotten
Sperling Sensory Memory Experiment
12 letters flash on screen for sec, ppl recall the ones in a row. Specific rows show sensory memory (temporary vision stimulus)
Declarative Memory
Explicit memory that requires conscious thinking, facts you can tell others
Semantic Memory
Type of declarative memory, general facts and knowledge
Episodic Memory
Type of declarative memory, life events
Nondeclarative/Procedural Memory
Implicit memory for motor skills and habits, tying shoes
Skill Learning Memory
Type of procedural memory; knowing how to ride a bike
Priming Memory
Type of procedural memory; old memory affects how you respond to a different stimuli, being more likely to use a word you heard recently
Conditioning Memory
Type of procedural memory; salivating when you see your favorite food
Serial Order Effect
Remembering first and last items in list and forgetting items in the middle, U-shape recall curve
Primacy Effect
Remembering more information at the beginning of the list
Recency Effect
Remembering more information at the end of the list
Proactive Interference
New material is easily lost due to remembering old material
Retroactive Interference
Old material is easily lost due to remembering new material
Reconstruction Effect
When tying memory together, we include inaccurate info to fill in the gaps
Hindsight Bias
People think past events were more predictable than they actually were
Memory Dependence
More likely to remember info if we match the situation we learned it in, state (classroom) and state (chewing gum)
Mnemonic Devices
Retrieval techniques, incl. acronyms, phrases, chunking
Method of Loci
Mnemonic technique; placing info in a familiar mental space. loci: location. Bed, cat, dog, table, keys, shade → house path
Spearman’s Psychometric Approach
Human intelligence is defined through looking at two factors: G (general) and S (specific talents/skills)
Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory of Intelligence
Three types of intelligence; analytical, creative, practical (street smarts)
Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligence
Core types of intelligences, not one general intelligence; linguistic, mathematical, visual, body, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic, existential
Alfred Binet
Made first intelligence test; tested children failing in school; Mental age and Chronological age
Mental Age
Age children’s responses to intelligence tests show
Chronological Age
Actual age of child taking intelligence tests
Stanford Binet IQ Test
Lewis Terman from Stanford built ___ test off of Binet; more questions for more ages, tested fluid/quantitative/visual/working memory & intelligence, IQ Test
Binet-Simon Test
Intelligence test were kids tested remembering numbers, forming sentences, naming body parts; made by Alfred Binet and Test on Theodore Simon
Intelligence Quotient
Mental Age/Chronological Age * 100
Wechsler Scale
Made by David Wechsler; standardized intelligence scoring system; two forms: WAIS and WISC
WAIS
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (16+)
WISC
Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children
Raven’s Progressive Matrices Tests
Test-takers complete a missing piece in a grid of images; Nonverbal intelligence test; minimize language/cultural barriers
Koh’s Block Design Tests
Test-takers match colored cubes to a 2d diagram; Nonverbal intelligence test; minimize language/cultural barriers
Flynn Effect
Worldwide increases in intelligence over several decades, has recently stalled and even dropped
Jean Piaget
Studied child development after learning about Binet, studied his three children, created 4 stages of cognitive development
Schema
Concepts that organize information
Equilibrium
When a child’s environment matches the present schema
Disequilibrium
When a child’s environment conflicts with the present schema
Assimilation
Response to disequilibrium, interpreting experiences into existing schema; calling a cat a dog
Accommodation
Adapting existing schema to new experiences; creating a separate cat category from dog because it meows
Sensorimotor Stage (0-2)
Learning outcomes and effects of actions through senses; issues: object permanence and sense of self; Piaget
Object permanence
Understanding that objects continue to exist even when they’re not sensed; sensorimotor stage
Sense of Self
Understanding that body and actions belong to you; you pushed the toy; sensorimotor stage
Preoperational Stage (2-7)
Symbolic thinking and pretend play; issues: egocentrism, centration, Lack of Conservation; Piaget
Egocentrism
Tendency to understand situations from one own’s perspective and struggling to understand other’s; preoperational
Centration
Focusing on one characteristic of a stimuli and failing to notice other parts; preoperational
Lack of Conservation
Inability to understand an item can stay the same (volume) even when shape (height, length, container) changes; preoperational
Concrete Operational Stage (7-11)
Able to do (reversible) operations and analogies, metacognition; Piaget
Metacognition
Ability to think about thinking; concrete operational
Formal Operational Stage (11-15)
Logical and abstract reasoning
Abstract reasoning
Thinking about concepts with no physical representation; beauty, morality; formal operational
Adolescent egocentrism
Heightened sense of self-consciousness; formal operational
Imaginary Audience
Believing everyone is paying attention to and judging you, leads to hyper-consciousness; formal operational
Personal fable
Belief that own thoughts, feelings, and experiences are unique and understood by no one else; formal operational
Lev Vygotsky
Disagreed w/ Piaget that development timeline is set and can’t be accelerated; Zone of Proximal Development, Scaffolding
Zone of Proximal Development
Scaffolding
Apgar scale
Identifies and scores physical and mental development for newborns (heart rate, skin color etc)
Precocious Puberty
Early onset and rapid progression of puberty, occurs more in girls
Heritability
Estimate of how much variance in traits is due to genetics; high: nature, low: nurture
Sibling Studies
Comparison of siblings with different genetic overlap (identical, fraternal, siblings)
Self-fulfilling prophecies
Expectations about yourself change how you act in align with those expectations
Stereotypes
Overgeneralizations about groups of people, can be negative and positive
Prejudice
Unjustified attitude towards a member of a group solely because they’re apart of that group (belief)
Discrimination
Unfair treatment towards a member of a group solely because they’re apart of that group (action)
Attributions
How we explain causes/reasons for behavior
Internal Attributions
Explaining behaviors based on internal characteristics (they’re a bad driver because they’re Asian)
External attributions
Explaining behaviors based on the situation (they’re a bad driver because they had a bad morning)
Fundamental Attribution (Correspondence) Error
We explain other’s behaviors based off their characteristics more than their situation; doesn’t apply to collective cultures
Actor-Observer Effect
We explain our behaviors based off situation and explain others’ behaviors based off characteristic flaws
Conformity
Maintaining/changing behavior due to influence of others; often there’s no set social standard so we turn to group leaders
Autokinetic Effect
Participants guess distance of light, guesses of group converge into one group norm through social influence
Norm
Social standards of behavior and thoughts set by a group
Solomon Asch’s Line Study
Fake “vision test” comparing line lengths; 1 participant 7 actors, 7 actors gave the wrong answer and participant usually said wrong one too
Public compliance
Conforming to other peoples’ behaviors without believing in what they’re saying
Normative Social Influence
Conforming to others to be accepted/belong; 2 types: private acceptance and public compliance
Private Acceptance
Conforming to other peoples’ behavior out of genuine belief in what they’re doing/saying
Informational Social Influence
Changing opinions to conform to ppl we believe have accurate info
Self-Serving bias
We attribute personal failures to the situation and personal success to characteristics
Conformity Requirements & Effects
Quick response (increased conformity)
Unanimous (increased conformity)
Incentive for being correct (decreased conformity)
Bystander Effect
Decreased likelihood if helping someone if group doesn’t
Puralistic Ignorance
Situation where group rejects a norm privately but inaccurately assumes a norm because of others’ inactivity