Elements of Toulmin Argumentation

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/32

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards defining the key components of an argument diagram: Claim, Grounds/Facts/Evidence, Warrant, Backing, Qualifier, and Rebuttal.

33 Terms

1
New cards

Claim

The main point the speaker or writer is trying to make.

2
New cards

Grounds / Facts / Evidence

The evidence supporting the claim.

3
New cards

Warrant

An often-unspoken assumption that connects the grounds to the claim.

4
New cards

Backing

Strengthens the warrant by providing additional evidence or reasoning.

5
New cards

Qualifier

Limits the scope of the claim with phrases like 'most likely' or 'often'.

6
New cards

Rebuttal

Addresses potential counterarguments.

7
New cards

Backing

My neighbor Tim has three German Shepard dogs

8
New cards

Warrant

Dogs are common pets that bark and howl

9
New cards

grounds/facts/evidence

Barking and howling can be heard outside near my house

10
New cards

claim

There are dogs outside somewhere in my neighborhood

11
New cards

Qualifier

The howling and barking is most likely from dogs

12
New cards

Rebuttal

It could be wolves or coyotes instead of dogs

13
New cards

Ad hominem

An attack on the person rather than on their argument

14
New cards

Bandwagon

urge people to follow the same path as everyone else is taking

15
New cards

Begging the question

An argument that assumes the premise of a claim is true

16
New cards

Dogmatism

Asserting that a particular position is the only one conceivably acceptable within a community

17
New cards

Either or

Reducing the options for action to only two choices

18
New cards

Equivocation

An argument that gives a lie an honest appearance; a half truth, plays on the meaning of words

19
New cards

Faulty analogy

An argument based on a misleading comparison

20
New cards

Hasty generalization

Argument based on insufficient evidence

21
New cards

Moral equivalence

Suggesting that serious wrongdoing don’t differ in kind from minor offenses

22
New cards

Non sequitur

The conclusion does not follow from its premise

23
New cards

Faulty causality

Argument assuming one thing causes/ caused another thing that happened sequentially

24
New cards

Red herring

Serves as a diversion tactic to lead someone way from the real issue

25
New cards

Sentimental

Manipulating an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument

26
New cards

Scare tactics

Imagining something terrible happening that is actually statistical rarity

27
New cards
28
New cards

Slippery slope

An argument that something will inevitably happen without providing any evidence that it will

29
New cards

Straw man

Oversimplifying another’s argument to attack it easier

30
New cards

Appeal to false authority

Using the opinion of one’s self or an authority figure in place of an actual argument

31
New cards

Confirmation bias

the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one’s existing beliefs or theories

32
New cards

Dunning Kruger effect

The tendency for people with low expertise in a subject to overestimate their own ability and vice versa

33
New cards

Sunk cost fallacy

The tendency for people to be reluctant to abandon a strategy or course of action because they have invested heavily in it, even when the abandonment would be more beneficial