PHIL 1230 Lesson 3 — Complete Review

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/29

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

30 Terms

1
New cards

What is a valid argument?

An argument where true premises make a false conclusion impossible.

2
New cards

What does validity guarantee?

That if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot possibly be false.

3
New cards

Does validity require actual true premises?

No, validity is purely about logical structure, not actual truth.

4
New cards

What is a counterexample to validity?

A possible scenario where all premises are true and the conclusion is false.

5
New cards

How do you show an argument is invalid?

By providing a logically possible counterexample.

6
New cards

Can a valid argument have false premises?

Yes, valid arguments can have false premises and false conclusions.

7
New cards

Can a valid argument have a false conclusion?

Yes, if at least one premise is false.

8
New cards

What is the only combination forbidden by validity?

True premises and a false conclusion.

9
New cards

What is Modus Ponens?

If P then Q; P; therefore, Q.

10
New cards

Give a Modus Ponens example.

If P then Q; P; therefore, Q.

11
New cards

What is Modus Tollens?

If P then Q; not-Q; therefore, not-P.

12
New cards

Give a Modus Tollens example.

If raining, wet; not wet; therefore not raining.

13
New cards

What is Hypothetical Syllogism?

If P then Q; if Q then R; therefore, if P then R.

14
New cards

What is Disjunctive Syllogism?

P or Q; not-P; therefore, Q.

15
New cards

What is Affirming the Consequent?

If P then Q; Q; therefore, P. Invalid.

16
New cards

What is Denying the Antecedent?

If P then Q; not-P; therefore, not-Q. Invalid.

17
New cards

What is Constructive Dilemma?

P or Q; if P then R; if Q then S; therefore, R or S.

18
New cards

What defines a formal argument form?

A pattern of reasoning defined by structure rather than content.

19
New cards

Are circular arguments valid?

Yes, an argument whose conclusion is one of its premises is valid.

20
New cards

Why are circular arguments considered valid?

Because true premises and a false conclusion remain strictly impossible.

21
New cards

What happens if an argument has an impossible premise?

Yes, it is automatically valid.

22
New cards

Why do inconsistent premises make an argument valid?

Because it is impossible for all premises to be true simultaneously.

23
New cards

What happens if an argument has a necessarily true conclusion?

Yes, it is automatically valid.

24
New cards

Why does a necessary conclusion make an argument valid?

Because the conclusion can never be false under any circumstances.

25
New cards

Is validity about good persuasion?

No, logical validity does not guarantee a good real-world argument.

26
New cards

What is a sound argument?

A valid argument with actually true premises.

27
New cards

Can a valid argument be unsound?

Yes, if one or more premises are false.

28
New cards

Does validity depend on the subject matter?

No, validity depends entirely on logical form, not content.

29
New cards

What does an invalid argument fail to guarantee?

That the conclusion is true when premises are true.

30
New cards

What is the technical term for valid arguments with true premises?

A sound argument.