public policy supplemental questions and the readings

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/26

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 4:31 AM on 10/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

27 Terms

1
New cards

What is public policy

a government decision or course of action designed to address a public problem. It includes what government chooses to do and sometimes what it chooses not to do

2
New cards

What are the opportunities and challenges of democratic policymaking

Democracy gives citizens opportunities to influence policy through voting, political participation, interest groups, and public opinion. The challenge is that citizens have different preferences, and policymakers must aggregate those preferences and make decisions that may not satisfy everyone.

3
New cards

Why is public policymaking often inefficient

Policymaking involves social interaction problems such as:

  • Preference aggregation: determining what the group actually wants.

  • Delegation: choosing and controlling people who act on behalf of others.

  • Credible commitment: making promises that others believe will be kept.

  • Bargaining: reaching agreements when everyone must consent.

  • Cooperation/coordination: getting self-interested individuals to work toward a shared goal.


4
New cards

What is an analytic approach to public policy

It uses systematic reasoning and evidence to understand policy problems, evaluate alternatives, and determine whether policies achieve their goals.

5
New cards

What is a scientific approach to public policy

It applies the scientific method to policy questions by developing theories and hypotheses and testing them with evidence

6
New cards

What is the scientific method?

  • Ask a question.

  • Develop a theory.

  • Derive a testable hypothesis.

  • Test the hypothesis.

  • Analyze the data and determine whether the hypothesis is supported.


7
New cards

Why do economic and political systems struggle to solve social problems

Because individuals often act in their own self-interest. What is best for one person may not be best for the group. This creates cooperation and collective-action problems

8
New cards

When does individual self-interest fail to produce socially optimal outcomes

When individuals have incentives to free-ride, avoid costs, or take benefits without contributing to the group. When everyone behaves this way, the group can end up worse off.

9
New cards

What role do markets play in creating and solving social dilemmas

Markets can efficiently allocate resources when competition, information, and property rights work properly. However, markets can fail because of monopolies, externalities, information problems, transaction costs, and problems involving public/common goods

10
New cards

What role does government play in creating and solving social dilemmas

Government can address market failures through providing goods/services, taxation and subsidies, and regulation. However, government itself can fail through political incentives, market distortions, principal-agent problems, and majority-rule problems.

11
New cards

How do policy analysts evaluate causal claims?

They compare what actually happened to what would have happened under a different condition—the counterfactual. Ideally, treatment and control groups are compared so the effect of the policy can be isolated.

12
New cards

What are acceptable levels of uncertainty?

Scientific research rarely provides absolute certainty. Researchers quantify uncertainty and determine whether evidence is strong enough to support a conclusion

13
New cards

Scientific uncertainty

Recognizing that evidence has limitations and appropriately acknowledging uncertainty.

14
New cards

Ill-informed skepticism

Rejecting evidence without a legitimate scientific basis.

15
New cards
16
New cards

How can ill-informed skepticism be used politically

Political actors can emphasize uncertainty or demand unrealistic levels of certainty to undermine evidence they do not want policymakers to accept

17
New cards

Who controls the bureaucracy

No single institution completely controls it. Congress, the president, courts, interest groups, and bureaucrats themselves all have influence.

18
New cards

How can government grow while bureaucracy shrinks

Government responsibilities can expand even if the number of traditional federal bureaucrats declines because the government can rely more heavily on contractors, state/local governments, and other outside organizations

19
New cards

Why does accountability create red tape

Oversight requires rules, reports, procedures, documentation, and monitoring. These mechanisms can improve accountability but also make agencies slower and more complicated.

20
New cards

How can elected officials oversee millions of bureaucrats

They use formal and informal oversight mechanisms such as hearings, investigations, mandatory reports, inspectors general, GAO investigations, budget restrictions, appointments, and reporting requirements.

21
New cards

Is there a rationale for different levels of government providing services

Yes. Local governments may be better suited for services involving local preferences, while state governments can handle broader regional issues and the national government can address problems involving the entire country or interstate coordination.

22
New cards

Was nationalization inevitable

Not necessarily, but nationalization occurred as national problems, interstate externalities, coordination problems, and political pressures made federal involvement increasingly useful

23
New cards

When states challenge national authority, who wins

The Constitution, federal statutes, and courts help determine the final authority. The Supremacy Clause establishes that valid federal law takes priority over conflicting state law.

24
New cards

Arango — “In Clash Between California and Trump, It’s One America Versus Another”

Main point: Federalism can provide states with a way to challenge the federal government. California challenged Trump administration policies involving issues such as immigration, offshore drilling, and taxes. Importantly, the political party of the state and president can influence these conflicts.

Key takeaway: Federalism creates multiple levels of government that can check one another

25
New cards

Rauch — “A Separate Peace”

Main point: Abortion policy may benefit from being debated at the state level rather than being completely nationalized. Nationalization can reduce opportunities for compromise and encourage more extreme positions.

Example: State-level debates over gay marriage demonstrated how policy change can develop through state politics before becoming national.

Key takeaway: Decentralization can sometimes encourage compromise

26
New cards

Trounstine — “All Politics is Local”

Main point: Local politics deserves more attention because it represents a major part of American government and provides valuable opportunities for political research.

Three major reasons:

  1. Local politics represents a large share of political activity.

  2. Local politics provides methodological advantages because there is significant variation between local governments.

  3. Studying local politics allows researchers to ask different questions and understand an important part of the political system.

Key takeaway: Local government matters much more than political science has traditionally recognized.

27
New cards

Weissert — “Hidden in Plain Sight: Florida’s Special Districts”

Main point: Special districts are governmental entities created to address specific policy problems such as water control, drainage, mosquito control, housing, and community development.

Advantages: They can solve regional problems, create economies of scale, and potentially improve accountability by focusing on one specific function.

Disadvantages: They can be confusing and may be distant from voters. Some officials are not elected, which can make accountability difficult.

Key takeaway: Special districts can efficiently address specialized/regional problems but may reduce democratic accountability.