Engl 37 Test #2

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/27

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

28 Terms

1
New cards

What is the main argument of Ewick & Silbey's The Common Place of Law?

Law is part of everyday life, not just courts and written rules. People shape its meaning through experience.

2
New cards

What are the three ways people view law?

Before the Law, With the Law, and Against the Law.

3
New cards

What does Before the Law mean?

Law is viewed as fair, neutral, objective, and separate from everyday life.

4
New cards

What does With the Law mean?

Law is viewed as a game. People strategically use rules to achieve their goals.

5
New cards

What does Against the Law mean?

Law is viewed as unfair or biased, so people resist it or work around it.

6
New cards

What is Cover's main argument in Nomos & Narrative?

Law and storytelling are inseparable. Stories, beliefs, and values give legal rules meaning.

7
New cards

What do Nomos, Narrative, and Prescription mean?

Nomos: normative universe of values and rules. Narrative: stories giving meaning. Prescription: standards for behavior.

8
New cards

What is Abrego's concept of relational legal consciousness?

A person's understanding of law is shaped by the legal experiences and statuses of their family members.

9
New cards

What are the four main experiences of citizenship in Abrego's study?

Privilege, responsibility, guilt, and love. Citizenship can create unequal opportunities and family obligations.

10
New cards

What did Hirabayashi (1943) and Korematsu (1944) demonstrate?

The Supreme Court upheld wartime restrictions on Japanese Americans based on ancestry, prioritizing national security over constitutional rights.

11
New cards

How does law influence everyday life according to Ewick & Silbey?

It shapes people's behavior, decisions, relationships, and understanding of their rights.

12
New cards

Why is law considered a social construction?

Its meaning is shaped by people's experiences, interactions, and responses.

13
New cards

Can the three views of law overlap?

Yes. People can view law in multiple ways, even in contradictory ways.

14
New cards

What is an example of Before the Law?

Taking a landlord to court believing the legal system will objectively protect tenant rights.

15
New cards

What is an example of With the Law?

Using a legal technicality or procedure to avoid a penalty or win a dispute.

16
New cards

What is an example of Against the Law?

Protesting a law believed to discriminate against a racial or immigrant group.

17
New cards

What does Cover mean by a normative universe?

A shared world of rules, beliefs, traditions, values, and ideas about justice.

18
New cards

How are law and narrative connected?

Stories give laws meaning, while legal rules also influence society's stories.

19
New cards

Why can different communities interpret laws differently?

They have different histories, traditions, beliefs, and moral values.

20
New cards

What is an example of prescription in Cover's theory?

A standard telling people what is permitted, prohibited, right, or wrong.

21
New cards

How many interviews did Abrego conduct, and with whom?

100 interviews with members of Latino mixed-status families in Los Angeles.

22
New cards

What is a mixed-status family?

A family whose members have different immigration or citizenship statuses.

23
New cards

What is legal consciousness?

How people understand and experience law, rights, responsibilities, and government authority.

24
New cards

How can U.S. citizenship create responsibility in mixed-status families?

Citizen children may feel pressure to help undocumented relatives financially and practically.

25
New cards

Why might citizen children remain silent about relatives' immigration status?

To protect family privacy and avoid unwanted attention or possible consequences.

26
New cards

What was the difference between Hirabayashi and Korematsu?

Hirabayashi challenged a curfew; Korematsu challenged an exclusion order forcing Japanese Americans to leave.

27
New cards

What happened to Korematsu's conviction in 1983 and 2018?

His conviction was overturned in 1983; the Supreme Court expressly repudiated the decision in 2018.

28
New cards

What constitutional amendment was used as an important argument by Hirabayashi and Korematsu?

The Fifth Amendment, particularly its protection of due process.