1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Argument
process of establishing that a claim, belief, position, or conclusion is reasonable
Claim/Conclusion/Position
The central assertion or position that an argument seeks to establish.
Premises/Contentions/Reasons
Statements that support or justify a claim by explaining why the audience should accept it.
Warrants/Analysis/Commentary/Reasoning
Logical explanations that connect evidence to a claim, demonstrating why the evidence supports the argument and how it contributes to the writer’s larger position.
Claim of Fact
Assertion about what exists, has occurred, or can be demonstrated through observation or evidence
Claim of Definition
An assertion about how something should be understood, interpreted, categorized, or classified
Claim of Causality
An assertion that establishes a cause-and-effect relationship between events, conditions, or actions
Claim of Value
An assertion that evaluates something as good or bad, beneficial or harmful,
Claim of Policy
An assertion that proposes a particular action, solution, in response to a problem or issue.
Evidence
Facts, examples, observation, research, data or other information used to support a claim or premise.
Quantitative Evidence
numerical or measurable information like statistics and percentages
qualitative evidence
descriptive, non-numerical information drawn from observations, experiences interviews narratives or interpretations
examples/generalizations
an argumentative method that uses specific instances or cases to illustrate or support a broader claim
analogies
an argumentative method that compares two situations, concepts or objects
authority
an argumentative method that uses the knowledge, expertise or testimony of a credible source to support a claim
causality/causal reasoning
an argumentative method that establishes or examines cause and effect relationships between events actions or conditions
qualification/qualifier
act of refining or limiting a claim by recognizing conditions, exceptions, distinctions or degrees
limitation
a weakness, omission, assumption, exception, or condition that restricts the validity, scope, or applicability of an argument
conditional reasoning
a form of reasoning that examines how a conclusion or consequence depends upon particular circumstance or conditions
counterclaim/counterargument
an opposing or alternative position that challenges central claim
steel man
attacking strongest part of an opposing argument
straw man
distorted, exaggerated or oversimplified representation of an opposing argument that makes it easier to attack or dismiss
acknowledgement
act of recognizing an opposing perspective and demonstrating why reasonable people might hold that view
concession
an argumentative strategy in which a writer recognizes that an opposing argument contains a valid point or legitimate concern
rebuttal
a reasoned response to an opposing argument that challenges its claims
refutation
showing how an opposing claim/argument is false
consequences
the potential outcomes, effects or implications of accepting a claim making a decision or following a particular course of action
impact chain
a sequence of logically connected effects demonstrating how one action decision or condition may lead to consequences
weighing
process of comparing competing arguments by evaluating relative significance, likelihood, scope or consequences of their claims.
magnitude
how substantial the consequences of a particular position may be
probability
how likely an outcome/consequence will occur
timeframe
how son a consequence may occur and how long its effcts may last
scope
number of people, groups, institutions, or areas affected by an action, decision or outcome
reversibility
degree to which the consequences of a decision or action can be undone
Feasibility
degree to which a proposed action, policy, or solution can realistically be implemented
Backing
Additional evidence, reasoning, or justification that supports a warrant or strenghtens the logical foundation of an argument