1/11
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Embarrassment Test Study
students were invited to take part in group discussion of sex
had to pass an embarrassment test with mild vs. severe sex-related words
after completing a boring task, those who had read the more severe words reported greater enjoyment of study
we enjoy the things we suffer for
Line Length Study
participants were given sets of lines, either with or without labels
the participants who had groups labeled remembered the lines differently (remembered lines in the group as being more similar in height than they were in reality)
categories affect memory
Expectations about Newborns Study
participants viewed babies who were equal in height, weight, and other aspects of physical appearances
saw girls as: softer, smaller, with finer features underestimated crawling ability
saw boys as: stronger, more alert, better coordinated, overestimated crawling ability
confirmation bias
Face Drawing Study
participants had a conversation with a racially ambiguous man
were then asked to draw him—> those who were told he was white drew him with more stereotypically white features, those who were told he was Black drew him with more stereotypically Black features
confirmation bias
Classroom Study
students who teachers were told were gifted ultimately performed better (even though students not necessarily gifted)
self-fulfilling prophecy
Essay Study
participants read essays written about Fidel Castro (pro vs. anti) and were told the person either had freely chosen the side or position was assigned by professor
when participants believed the writers had no choice, still somewhat believed that the essay reflected the writer’s beliefs
correspondent interference theory
Quiz Show Study
questioners developed 10 questions of their choice for a contestant to answer
observers were asked to rate general knowledge of contestants and questioners
observers gave contestants much lower general knowledge than the questioners (ignored the role of the situation and the power of the questioner)
fundamental attribution error
Epinephrine Study
participants were injected with epinephrine and either told the drug had effects or not told the drug had effects
a confederate either acted happy or angry while filling out questionnaire with personal questions
no warning group was hypothesized that would look around environment to try and figure out the cause of their arousal
two-factor theory of emotion
Shopping Around Study
show people identical pairs of products (color or similar characteristics may vary)
people think there is a distinction
when asked to choose which product is the best quality, pronounced right-to-left position effect
participants are not aware of this positioning effect and will find other explanations for why they chose it
limits of introspection
Narcissism and Aggression Study
participants wrote an essay and then were given standard positive or negative feedback
people high in narcissism were much more aggressive towards their partner (especially when given negative feedback), but people low in narcissism were not that aggressive regardless of feedback type
effects of narcissism
Self-Esteem and Social Media
correlational study
increased Facebook use correlated with lower self-esteem (relationship impacted by more exposure to upward social comparisons (people tend to post only positive/good things))
increased Facebook use correlated to more social comparisons (more upward social comparisons than downward social comparisons)
effects of social comparison
Internalized Stereotype Study
correlational study
more people internalized racial stereotypes of their group, the more they participated in academic self-handicapping (positive correlation)
more academic self-handicapping is correlated with a lower GPA (negative correlation)
self-handicapping