1/40
Looks like no tags are added yet.
what is development
lasting changes that appear in an orderly manner
what is maturation
changes that occur naturally and are genetically programmed
How does maturation constrain certain parts of development?
physical maturation constrains cognitive and social development
cannot speed up development beyond what is allowed by physical maturation
what is learning
interactions with the environment
can be through active exploration or social transmission
Nature vs nurture
how the individual interacts with their environment and vice versa dictates how genes are expressed during development
Are behaviours due to only nature or nurture?
No behaviours are purely genetic OR just from the environment; there is a constant interaction going on throughout development
3 general principles of development
people develop at different rates
development is orderly
development is gradual
Piaget’s Theory of Cognitive Development
children learn in fundamentally different discrete ways at each stage of development
children are little scientist who use play to interact with and learn from environment
Piaget: Organization
as children develop, they organize thought and behaviour into schemas
over time, schemas become more complex and efficent
Piaget: Adaptation
More understanding in an environment comes with time and experience which leads to the ability to adjust better in the environment
Piaget: Assimilation
Assimilating new information into existing schemas
Piaget: Accommodation
Modifying or creating new schemas to accommodate new info
Equilibration
schema is accurate → expectation and experience match → we experience equilibration
Balance between Assimilation and Accommodation
Disequilibriation
schema doesn’t make sense→ mismatch between expectation and experience → uncomfortable/anxious
Piagets Stages of Development
in each stage, new abilities emerge that were not in the previous stage
Piaget: Preoperational Age + Abilities
2-7 yrs/ JK-Gr 2
Make-believe/ pretend play
Semiotic funciton
egocentric thought
one-way logic
Semiotic Function
preoperational stage
ability to think in symbols
ex. red rose is symbolic of love and desire
Egocentric thought
preoperational stage
inability to take someone elses’ perspective; assumption that everyone else shares their feelings and experiences
ex. i can’t see you, so you can’t see me
one-way logic
preoperational stage
can think through operations logically in one direction only
struggles with conservation tasks
Piaget: Concrete Operational Age + Abilities
7-11yrs/ grades 3-6
can think logically about concrete/hands-on problems
understands conservation rules
can organize based on classification and seriation (order/series)
Conservation Tasks
principle that the amount/number of something remains the same even if the arrangement or appearance is changed, as long as nothing is added and nothing is taken away.
3 things needed to solve conservation tasks
Identity - students knows if nothing is added or taken away, the material remains the same
Compensation - student knows apparent change in one direction can be compensated for by a change in another direction
Reversibility - student can mentally cancel out the change that was made
Piaget: Formal Operational Stage
11yrs+ / grade 7+
can understand abstract thought
can transcend concrete situations
adolescent egocentrism
Abstract Thought
operational stage
can understand problems without physical objects present
can understand abstract language —> metaphor, satire,etc
Adolescent egocentrism
focus on own thoughts, feeling, concerns, emotions, etc
ex. other people have experienced a similar thing, but not really like how I am experiencing it
Imaginary Audience
belief that everyone is watching and judging you
implications of Piagets theory for Education
different ages/grades will need different methods of teaching to understand concepts
instructions need to match developmental stage
children develop/progress through stages at different rates
critiques of piagets stage theory
development is continuous not discrete —> abilities for the next stage may start to show up as children learn and make mistakes practicing it
his task underestimate childrens abilities + his tasks have leading questions
doesn’t consider cultural and social factors
Information Processing Theories
Children stuggle with conservation and Piagetian tasks because they develop information proccesing skills as they mature
emphasis on development of executive function
Executive Function
Info-processing theory
all cognitive processes we use to organize, coordinate and perfrom goal-directed, intentional actions
Ex. focusing attention, inhibiting impulsive actions, organizing, etc
neo-Piagetian theories
Keep Piaget’s ideas on children trends in thinking and knowledge construction but adds findings from cognitive neuroscience and information processing theories
robbie case, kurt fisher
Vygotosky’s Sociocultural perspective
Very opposite to Piaget
believed that
Activities occur in a social and cultural context
Social interaction is the source of cognitive development
Cognitive skills mediated by language; Language is the critical skill
Vygotoskys: Co construction
Mental processes are co-constructed:
Participants interact → jointly construct solution, knowledge
Strategy to arrive at solution social, then internalized.
Vygotoskys: Cultural Tools
Learning, acquisition and internalization of Cultural tools
Cultural tools are used for problem solving
People have different tools available to them to solve problems based on their cultural context
ex. calculator, numbers, alphabet, beliefs, attitudes
Vygotosky: Use of Language
believed that language was the most important cultural tool
language is used to communicate with others
most of our thoughts are language based
private speech guides thoughts and actions
Piagetian view of Private Speech
Egocentric speech —> children talk to themselves during play
Collective monolouge —> children talk outloud without engaging w each other in convo
Socialized speech—> develops with maturation; children learn to listen and exchange (or argue) ideas
Vygotoskys’ view of Private Speech
private speech guides behaviour
first through parent to child
then child to child
then child to self
private speech is fundemental to cognitive development
private speech shpuld be encouraged in classes as children work on difficult/novel tasks
progression of private speech (Vygotosky)
Social communication with self, aloud (audible)
Becomes whispers
Silent with lip movements
Internalized as inner speech (silent)
Scaffolding
vygotosky
support and guidance for problem solving
older, more knowledgable individuals provide scaffolding
may be language-based, observational, and/or guided modeling
as childs ability increases, amount of scaffolding should decrease
Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)
area between childs current developmental level and the level of development they can achieve next
where learning occurs
success can be reached through instruction, help/support froma teacher or adult, encouragment, etc but not independently
Limitations of Vygotoskys theory
general ideas —> vygotosky passed before his work could be further developed
students have carried on his work —> unsure if he would agree with these current theories