1/33
Hearing and Theories of Speech Perception
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
speech is rapid, continuous and ___ across speakers and context
VARIES
when giving out instructions as an SLP. what should you be mindful of ?
the clients preferred speech perception! And will that match the level of your speech production?
acoustic features are/are not invariant?
are not
different values of VOT could yield…
perception of voicing in plosives
different values of F2 steady states may yield perception of a particular vowel
minimal meaningful unit of speech that we process
phoneme
minimal meaningful unit by itself
morpheme
but are we processing a morpheme as a whole? not really
unit of analysis
features, phonemes, syllables, contextual variants of these units
there is a lack of clear____ between phonemes
segmentation
define normalization
process of simplification by smoothing out the variability or “noise” and the superfluous variability to get the essence of the signal.
is speech perception uniquely human?
think of your dog? it understands commands, so speech perception isn’t uniquely human.
categorical shift
aka quantum change - but not unique to speech
like shade of colors ?
duplex perception
two components of one syllable
one phoneme is the base, the other phoneme is the chirp.
/da/ vs /ga/
the F3 formant to achieve /ga/ from /da/
example of specialixzed percention
mcGurk effect
perceptual illusion
hear one thing and see a different thing. literally an illusion
contextual effect
experiment with sine wave speech. this is a pure tone freq. central frequencies of vowels are the only listened during speech.
how to understand the full text?
its called gating (separate experiment) - is when you hear word as successive fragments. requires 300ms of word identification. more fragments = better guess
recap ear anatomy (structures)
pinna
outer ear
TM
ear canal
malleus,incus,stapes
vestibuli
cochlea
hair cells
mechanical to electrochemical energy
main function of external ear
acoustic gain (frequency dependent)
main function of middle ear
impedance matching (overall gain)
main function of inner ear
tonotopic organization, intensity driven, temporal processing
main function of auditory neural pathway
continued speech processing, integration (binaural, audio visual)
conductive hearing loss
perceive the sounds diminished
reduced audibility
mechanical issue
sensorineural hearing loss
may perceive sounds diminished and distorted
frequency resolution challenges, altered loudness
theory of speech perception
bottom up theories- based on input. data driven. presented new info? probably bottom up.
top down theories - higher order information reliant
active theory (i obvi know what an apple is) vs passive theory (i’m using context clues to guess what you’re inferring) based on cognition and interpreting the acoustic signal
autonomous theory - doesnt rely on contextual factors
interactive theory - DOES rely pn contextual facotrs
MOTOR THEORY ( for speech perception)
based on invariant aritculatory gestures. not actual articulation, but the motor program /command for production.
speech perception is specialized. lack of invariance doesnt matter for this theory!
THIS IS TOP-DOWN THEORY
Analysis by synthesis - matching features to a basic unit such as a syllable
there is something called “synthesis by analysis” - it is the opposite (bottom up)
motor theory states that
we perceive speech because our motor programs are active
mirror neurons: - in the premotor cortex theres a network of neurons representing a motor action activated when we see an action
ie: we see someone jumping, motor plans in our brains register the jumping.
what is a problem in motor theory
there will always be a difference between seeing and speaking
specifics is not established
acoustic landmarks and distinctive features theory
acoustic driven
relies on both input characteristics and stored knowledge
imput processing yields landmarks dections
landmarks are constriants
3 types of landmarks
vocalic
glide
consonantal
articulator free
the motor theory of speech production is an exclusively bottom-up theory of speech perception. (t/f)
f
speech perception in babies
can change based off of environment, stage of development.
2 types of research for babies
reaction of stimuli
new reaction to different stimuli
motory theory problems with speech perception in babies
no stored information in babies! what then?!
we assume motor programs are innately present.
native language magnet theory
incoming stimuli help strengthen their neural maps. sensory drives motor learning.
exposure creates better maps
what is extralinguistics
indexical information
information derived from other aspects of language- lexical semantics, pragmatics, morpho-syntaxindex
indexical info might not be
accurate
listening to speech sample and trying to assume the person”s gender dialect, social status are examples of this!
which features would be relevant for indexical information that may be derived using properties of a speech signal?
accentedness
gender
race
all of these