1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
3 Tenants of Interpersonal Theory: 1 tenant
Interpersonal relationships are the heart of human existence
Loneliness/ isolation worst thing that can happen
Personality development= interpersonal interaction
3 tenants of interpersonal theory: 2 tenant
The way we feel about ourselves is a product of how others feel about us
Self perception= how we think others see us
3 tenants of interpersonal theory: 3 tenant
The strongest motivating force in human life is the avoidance of anxiety
Anxiety as a social experience
Arises from our feelings of acceptance from others
Barometer of how we are doing in the social world
Anxiety= perceiving social rejection from others
Sociometer theory
The mothering one
Anxiety is CONTAGIOUS especially for an infant
The mothering one= primary caregiver
The gradient of anxiety
Mom anxiety=baby anxiety= baby has done something wrong
Personifications:
Result from interactions with the mothering one and anxiety, the way we are thinking about ourself and other people, internalized representations of self and others
Harry Stack Sullivan
3 tenants of interpersonal theory, Anxiety as a social experience, the mothering one, the gradient of anxiety, personifications
D. W. Winnicott
Primary material preoccupation, goal of development. emergence of self, experience of the child, the niffle, requirements of the mother, the moment of illusions, healthy narcissism, the good enough mother.
Primary material preoccupation:
women (not men) enter a state after birth, characterized by enhanced sensitivity to needs of child
Goal of development:
to develop a self that is separate from others but also connected at the same time
emergence of self:
All infants come into the world in a merger with their mothers
Like Sullivan, no distinction between self and mother
requirements of the mother:
1. “Perfect” environment( m=”maternal instinct”), 2. Actualizing fantasies-, Infantile omnipotence
Requirements of the mother: actualizing fantasies
-> fantasy= mental event
Infant must instantly get whatever it wants
Imagines breast feeding, the mother must instinctively breast feed
The moment of illusions
Mother meets those 3 requirements then…
A child develops beliefs that cause things to appear just by wishing for them.
Later, mom serves as diplomat from reality visiting the king baby
Introduce reality to baby
Fantasies come to mirror reality
Desires more consistent with what we can expect from real world
healthy narcissism:
Moment of illusion= basis of a healthy sense of self
Still, must transfer from Emperor baby
To a world that is scary
To provide this experience the mother must be “good enough”
The good enough mother:
1. Actualize fantasies
2. Allow for times of “quiescence” (when the kid is quiet and needless)
Let the child drive the interaction
3. Respect transitional objects
Exist simultaneously in the fantasy world (symbolic) and the real world
Example: the child is in charge of it
Cross from fantasy to reality
4. Lends child her ego boundaries:
Example: lives through the child’s rages without retaliating
Provides stability and consistency
5. Survive destruction-> must allow herself to fail, and child must lose the idea that she is perfect
Surviving destruction
Child realizes not king of universe
Mom= queen, instead
Must accept the imperfect “real mom”
Heinz Kohut:
The empathic understanding of the experience of other human beings is as basic an endowment of man as his vision, hearing, touch, taste and smell
How self-psychology differed from psychodynamics
Rejected aspects of Freud’s drive structure model, instead focused on the self
Relationships provide sustenance to the self through the support of well being and self worth
Thought relationships were more important than the drives, sex, aggression, internal conflicts, and fantasies that we associate with psychodynamic approaches
Empathy:
The key to human existence
Infant born ready to bond socially
Psychopathology typically comes from lack of empathy from parents to child
Self objects
Inhabitants of the child’s world who take on the tasks that the child will eventually perform for him/ herself.
Inhabitants=people
Example parents regulate emotions for child
Crying/ soothing
Selfobjects become internalized and define the person's self
Without them, we are “empty” lack a sense of self
Note that he did not define psychological health as rigid independence from others but as being connected
Malleable and relevant to personality throughout life
Much evidence that healthy romantic relationships lower neuroticism
Two essential types of selfobject relations
Grandiose selfobjects, Idealizing exhibitionistic
Grandiose selfobjects:
I am perfect and you admire me
Typically mom (mirrors self worth)
Idealizing exhibitionistic:
You are perfect and I am part of you
Typically dad (identify with competence)
Different people throughout life serve these selfobject relations (example, coach, teacher, friends, etc)
Object relations today
Not for severe psychological disorders
More biological explanations
Large impact on attachment theory
Gender development and moral reasoning
Girls and boys development of the self and “ego boundaries”
Girls: both female and mother views the girl as like her
Girl remains in a close connection to mother, develops a sense of “self in relation” to the mother
Her ego boundaries are penetrable, relates easily to others, prepared to share ego boundaries as a mother
Boys: because of strict gender roles, boy gets “kicked out” of merger with mom
Boy must develop sense of self that is different from her
Expected to develop a sense of self with dad: often doesn't work out, ultimately develops very rigid ego boundaries.
“Self as separate” impenetrable ego boundaries
Gilligan: Voice of rights vs voice of care
Men:Voice of rights: reason based on responsibility and abstract principles: protecting rights/ upholding justice, based on laws and justice, the man should not have stolen the medicine
Women: Voice of care: reason based on enduring interpersonal bonds and compassion for others, individual needs, the man should have stolen the medicine because his wife needed it, and it was the only way to save her
attachment theory
Inspired by: Freud, in a non clinical context, transference can be thought of as applying patterns of behavior and emotion from previous relationships/ situations to new relationships/ situations.
How is attachment Theory related to object relations & psychodynamics?
Object relations especially with the mother in early childhood are key to attachment theory
Bowlby & The roots of attachment theory in juvenile thieves and WHO work on orphans
John Bowlby (1907-1990) founder of attachment theory
Psychoanalyst, developmental psychology, and evolutionary theorist
“I wouldn;t send a dog to boarding school at age 7”
Trained under Melanie Kline
Too much attention spoils kid
Ostracized for his belief that issues with developmental are rooted in real life experiences, not internal mental fantasies
“What cannot be communicated to the mother cannot be communicated to the self”
After WWII, Bowlby recruited by who to work with orphaned children in Europe, Had all needs met, but showed disorder and failure to thrive
Studied a group of 44 “delinquent” children at the Canterbury clinic, Found 17 of them had experienced prolonged separation from mother before age 5, applied this idea to explain developmental issues of those orphaned during WWII
Evolutionary perspective on attachment (how is it adaptive?)
Attachment incorporates ethology: attachment arises from mothers satisfying instinctual need for food
Developing attachment between mother and child was instinctual defence mechanism that would protect child from predators
Human attachment about more than just food/ predators
Caring relationships sets stage of developing sense of self
Bowlby: being mothered (love, warmth, caring) was essential to psychological development
Mary Ainsworth RESPONSIBLE for turning attachment theory into a scientific theory
Worked with Bowlby and was crucial to development of attachment theory
Know what the hypothetico deductive model refers to

Correspondence between mathematical estimates vs. real-world constructs
Real things in world dont equal measures/ operationalizations
Operational definitions enable us to mathematically define constructs, however these are always imperfect, cant perfectly measure time, always measurement error
Thus our mathematical estimates are never perfect representations of the thing in the real world
Psychology: operational definition= scores on a self report scale
Tool to gather measurement: psychological scales/ questionnaires
Almost all personality research is correlational
What is the difference between correlational and experimental research?
Having good measures/ operationalizations is super important
Carol Gilligan & gender differences in moral reasoning
developed a framework challenging traditional theories of moral development, specifically pointing out how earlier models failed to capture women's moral reasoning
How did object relations differ from psychodynamics?
Interpersonal Relationships vs. Internal Drives:, Relational Self vs. Separation/Autonomy:, Moral Reasoning (Voice of Care vs. Voice of Rights):
Allport
“Psychologists cannot tell us what normality, health, or maturity of personality mean. Yet every practical minded person, including psychologists and psychotherapists, would like to know.“ If you want to see how the average person behaves you need to study average people, not just the special cases of people. Founded psychology of religion. It makes no sense to study personality starting with people who are suffering from psychological disorders.
definition of personality (Allport)
The dynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his unique adjustment to the environment
The proprium
The self
Aspects of experience that are essential to who we are
We cherish them
They are unique to us
Central to our identity
This “sense of self” develops throughout life (lifelong process doesn't ever end)
how the proprium develops
Sense of body (first 2 years of life) what counts as “me” vs not, physical
Self identity (first 2 years) mental, social, psychological
Self esteem (2-4) liking yourself
Self extension (4-6) investing in things outside yourself, objects-> people more interest in the person than the toy, and if you share with them you will make that person happy
Self image (4-6) how others see you matters
Rational coping (6-12) problem solving, we can use insights from past experience and apply them to new problems
Propriate striving (lifelong after 12) goals, life dreams, what you want to get out of life
Functional autonomy of acquired motives
A system of motivation
Reasons for behavior today are different from those that first caused that behavior
Motives develops from infantile drives, but become independent of them (why do you brush your teeth) > takes what someone is doing now, and explains it now
This perspective very new and different- takes what someone is doing now and it explains it now
“Whatever drives, drives now” whatever is causing your behavior now is from now rather than from childhood experiences.
functional autonomy of acquired motives implications
human behavior is contemporary, motives drive behavior now, not childhood experiences.
Explained how we become the person we hope to be (fictional finalism).
Explains how motives can be learned just as skills can be learned (enjoying hard work)
Explains the drive that accompanies talent/ success, Especially when someone continues doing something they no longer need to
functional autonomy of acquired motives examples
“Activities and objects that earlier in the game were means to an end, now become the ends in themselves.”
Person who seeks to perfect a craft: In line with Adler, initially driven by perceived inferiority engrained in childhood
Later becomes a need to excel/ enjoy the craft itself
Functional autonomy explains: reading literature, fashion, use of cosmetics, strolls in public park, vacation, all may serve pursuit of pleasure, but every one of these may become an interest in itself, held for a lifetime long after erotic ends.
Example: old man who used to be a fisherman to make ends meet and acquired a love for the sea. Now he has a new higher paying job that destroys the original motive, yet his hunger for the sea still keeps going.
Explains: historical greats in their field who continue to do things past their prime.
Capacity for self extension
Interested in others well being
In world outside of personal interests
Invested in quality of the world
Able to care for others, risk failure, and be vulnerable
Emotional security and self acceptance
Not a drama queen
Responds to emotional situations appropriately
Not overwhelmed by life
Recognize strength and weaknesses in self
Definition of traits (Allport)
“ neuropsychic structures” within the person that “ render different situations functionally equivalent” for the person
Neuropsychic structures
both the mind and the nervous system (body) affect thoughts and behaviors, “Psychophysical”
Functionally equivalent
responding to different situations similarly
Different situations are responded to the same way by the person because traits make us see different situations as “the same”
How does the trait approach differ from psychodynamic approaches?
Traits are not new
Allport: personality should be studied in terms of traits
Idea of traits/ stable dispositions/ individual differences is an old philosophical idea
Quick detour to the ancient world
Ancient personality
First theory of personality in 400 BCE
Personality is older than Christianity
Plato’s tripartite architecture of the mind/personality definition
The logos: rational/ logical
The thymos- spiritual/ emotional
The eros- appetitive/ physical desires (pleasure)
Personality= unique combinations of these in the person
Utopia= social cast system based on these personality traits
Rational/logical component of the person would live on past death
Galen’s personality theory
Based theory of personality on Hippocrates theory of disease (four fluids within the body)
High presence of a humor(body fluid) creates patterns of behavior
Phlegm= phlegmatic= sluggish/ unemotional
Blood= sanguine= cheerful
Yellow bile= choleric= irritable
Black bile= melancholic= depressed
Functional autonomy of acquired motives
( reason people doing things today were different from why we were doing them in the first place example brushing teeth)
functionally equivalent
(what personality traits are doing, behave similar in different situations)