Proof and Syntax

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/27

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering core concepts, logical equivalence laws, formal proofs, and syntax rules from Lecture 2: Proof and Syntax.

Last updated 2:09 PM on 9/30/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

28 Terms

1
New cards

Proposition

A statement that expresses a fact or opinion and can be assigned a truth value given a suitable definition.

2
New cards

Liar's Paradox

A self-referential and contradictory statement (such as 'This statement is false') that cannot have a truth value and lacks meaning.

3
New cards

Tautology

A statement that is always true in any context, represented in formal logic by the symbol ⊤\top (verum or top).

4
New cards

Contradiction

A statement that cannot be true, represented in formal logic by the symbol ⊥\bot (falsum or bottom).

5
New cards

Contingency

A logical statement that is neither a tautology nor a contradiction.

6
New cards

Double Negation Law (DN)

A logical law stating that negating a proposition twice returns the original truth value: ¬(¬P)≡P\neg(\neg P) \equiv P.

7
New cards

Law of Tautology (LT)

A logical law stating that every proposition is either true or false: P∨¬P≡⊤P \vee \neg P \equiv \top.

8
New cards

Law of Contradiction (LC)

A logical law stating that no proposition can be both true and false: P∧¬P≡⊥P \wedge \neg P \equiv \bot.

9
New cards

Negated Constants Law (Neg)

A logical law stating that tautologies and contradictions are opposites: ¬⊤≡⊥\neg\top \equiv \bot and ¬⊥≡⊤\neg\bot \equiv \top.

10
New cards

Idempotent Law (Id)

A logical law stating that conjunction or disjunction of a proposition with itself is unchanged: P∧P≡PP \wedge P \equiv P and P∨P≡PP \vee P \equiv P.

11
New cards

Zero and Unit Law for Conjunction

A law stating that ⊥\bot is the zero element of conjunction (P∧⊥≡⊥P \wedge \bot \equiv \bot) and ⊤\top is the identity element (P∧⊤≡PP \wedge \top \equiv P).

12
New cards

Commutative Law (Comm)

A logical law stating that changing the order of operands does not affect the truth value: (P∨Q)≡(Q∨P)(P \vee Q) \equiv (Q \vee P).

13
New cards

Associative Law (Assoc)

A logical law stating that grouping of operands does not affect the truth value: (P∨Q)∨R≡P∨(Q∨R)(P \vee Q) \vee R \equiv P \vee (Q \vee R).

14
New cards

Identity and Zero Law for Disjunction

A law stating that ⊥\bot is the identity element of disjunction (P∨⊥≡PP \vee \bot \equiv P) and ⊤\top is the zero element (P∨⊤≡⊤P \vee \top \equiv \top).

15
New cards

Distributivity Laws

Logical equivalences showing that conjunction distributes over disjunction (P∧(Q∨R)≡(P∧Q)∨(P∧R)P \wedge (Q \vee R) \equiv (P \wedge Q) \vee (P \wedge R)) and disjunction distributes over conjunction (P∨(Q∧R)≡(P∨Q)∧(P∨R)P \vee (Q \wedge R) \equiv (P \vee Q) \wedge (P \vee R)).

16
New cards

De Morgan's Law for And (DeM)

A logical law stating that the negation of a conjunction is the disjunction of negations: ¬(P∧Q)≡(¬P∨¬Q)\neg(P \wedge Q) \equiv (\neg P \vee \neg Q).

17
New cards

De Morgan's Law for Or (DeM)

A logical law stating that the negation of a disjunction is the conjunction of negations: ¬(P∨Q)≡(¬P∧¬Q)\neg(P \vee Q) \equiv (\neg P \wedge \neg Q).

18
New cards

Augustus De Morgan

A mathematician (1806–1871) associated with De Morgan's Laws in symbolic logic.

<p>A mathematician (1806–1871) associated with De Morgan's Laws in symbolic logic.</p>
19
New cards

Material Conditional Identity (Cond)

A logical law stating that a conditional statement P→QP \rightarrow Q is true when the antecedent is false or the consequent is true: P→Q≡(¬P∨Q)P \rightarrow Q \equiv (\neg P \vee Q).

20
New cards

Carnap

The logic system used to check and verify formal proofs.

21
New cards

QED Symbol (□\square)

A square symbol placed at the end of a formal proof meaning 'quod erat demonstrandum' (it has been proved).

22
New cards

Formal Syntax

Rules that use symbols to build sentences or formulae where variables and operators must be given in the correct order.

23
New cards

Well-formed Formula (wff)

A syntactically valid formula constructed according to formal syntax rules in logic.

24
New cards

Backus-Naur Form (BNF)

A notation used to specify syntax concisely using non-terminal symbols, terminal symbols, and pipe symbols (∣|) to separate alternative forms.

25
New cards

Biconditional (↔\leftrightarrow)

A logical connective defined as P↔Q≡(P→Q)∧(Q→P)P \leftrightarrow Q \equiv (P \rightarrow Q) \wedge (Q \rightarrow P).

26
New cards

Operator Precedence in Propositional Logic

The standard parsing hierarchy for logical connectives: ¬\neg, ∧\wedge, ∨\vee, →\rightarrow, ↔\leftrightarrow.

27
New cards

Right-associative Operator

A property of binary logical connectives where unbracketed expressions group their right-hand arguments first (e.g., P→Q→R≡P→(Q→R)P \rightarrow Q \rightarrow R \equiv P \rightarrow (Q \rightarrow R)).

28
New cards

Parse Tree

A visual representation of the syntactic structure of a formula, where branch nodes represent operators/connectives and leaf nodes represent terminal symbols.