1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
P is injured by D’s conduct which is neither intentional nor negligent. Tort?
No.
D tries to knock the hat off of P’s head but accidentally hits him in the face breaking his nose? Battery?
Yes, in dual or single-intent state. Intending offensive contact but causing harmful contact is still battery (McElhaney)
D tries to high-five P but misses and hits him in the face breaking his nose. Battery?
Yes in a single-intent jurisdiction, no in a dual-intent jurisdiction.
P is holding a lunch tray in a cafeteria and D smacks it out of their hand without touching P, battery?
Yes, extended personality principle
D punches P who falls into A’s television and breaks it. Is D liable for P’s injuries? For A’s TV?
Yes to both.
D tries to hit P with a rock from 100 feet away. The chance of D actually hitting him is very small. Battery is he hits? What if he misses?
Battery is he hits, not if he misses. (Maybe an assault though)
P is jumping on a trampoline when D