1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
self-report
respondents report their own thoughts, feelings and behaviour, by questionnaire or interview
careful sampling
the goal is an accurate estimate of what is true in a population, so large random samples are preferred
representative sample
resembles the population in evert way that matters for the question
sampling frame
list of the population that you can sample from
non-probability sampling
you cannot state the chance of selection
convenience: nearby and willing
snowball: participant recruit others
self-selection: people volunteer on their own
probability sampling
you can state each person’s chance of being selected
simple random: everyone has equal chance
stratified random: split list into groups (strata), then sample at random within each
cluster: randomly select groups, then people within them
sampling bias
how the sample is chosen makes it unrepresentative, so results are inaccurate
non-response bias
the people who do not respond differ from those who do
a perfectly random sample can still have non-response bias
sampling error
gap between a samples result and teh populations true value, caused by who happened to be drawn
random not systematic
frequency table
how many chose each category, report percentages
bar graph
order by frequency, largest first, seperate categories - not continuous variables
statistically significant
a difference this large would be unlikelt if there were no difference in the population
what is p
the probability of a difference at least this large, if there were really no difference in the population
five steps to one answer
interpret
retrieve
judge
format
edit
why self-reports go wrong
people cannot tell you
why
memory
future
people will not tell you
social desirability: looking good
demand characteristics: answer researcher seems to want
response sets: agreeing with everything
open-ended
respondents answer in their own words
use when you dont know the range of answers
slower; answers must be coded
closed-ended
respondents choose from options you give them
use when the constructs is well-defined
quicl to score, but the options steer answers
good practice in rating scales
5-7 options
label options with words
balance the options around the midpoint
bruso
brief: not wordy
relevant
unambiguous: clear to understand
specific: dont ask double barrel
objective: neutral questions
putting the survey together
into: why it matters, whos running it, informed consent
clear instructions, give example
most important items first
easy items before sensitive ones
demographics last
end with thanks