1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Philiosophical vs psychological approach to art
philosophy seeks to define what art is
psychology attempts to define how art is experienced
disinterested pleasure
appreciating, liking, or finding something beautiful without wanting to possess it
top down aesthetics
aconcepts and theories about what is good art
bottom up aesthetics
empirical inquiry into what people think good art is
used to draw conclusions about what makes art good
the perceptual threshold
the point at which a stimulus becomes possible to perceive
aesthetic threshold
hypothetical point of intensity at which a stimulus becomes pleasurable
unity in variety
most pleasurable visual stimuli have some elements of unity and some elements of variety
the golden ratio
resulting from fechner’s study of preferences for rectangle proportions
found that we like a 1:1.61 ratio, not too extreme or too square
led to golden ratio theory
criticisms of golden ratio theory
across a large sample the effect is weak - could be due to small effect or inconsistent (but large) effect
might result from prototypicality of rectangles with 1:1.61 ratio
Gestalt psychology
a ‘gestalt’ is more than the sum of its parts
the elements can change but the whole stays the same
can produce ‘illusory contours’
perceptual grouping