CJ305: Theories of Crime and Behavior — Exam 1 Vocabulary

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/192

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering basic legal definitions, criminology fundamentals, research designs, classical and rational choice theories, routine activity theory, deterrence, and social process theories.

193 Terms

1
New cards

Crime

A behavior or legally prohibited omission that violates criminal law and is subject to state-imposed punishment.

2
New cards

Criminal Behavior

Behavior prohibited by criminal law and subject to criminal penalties.

3
New cards

Deviant Behavior

Behavior that violates social norms, whether or not it violates the law.

4
New cards

Formal Social Control

Organized enforcement of rules by institutions such as police, courts, and corrections.

5
New cards

Informal Social Control

Everyday social pressure that encourages conformity, such as approval, criticism, and family expectations.

6
New cards

Consensus View of Law

The view that laws broadly reflect shared social values and protect society from behavior most people consider wrong.

7
New cards

Conflict View of Law

The view that laws reflect unequal power and may protect powerful groups while controlling less powerful groups.

8
New cards

Interactionist View of Law

The view that society defines crime through social interaction, interpretation, and the labeling of behaviors as criminal.

9
New cards

Moral Entrepreneurs

People or groups who campaign to define or regulate behavior as immoral, deviant, or criminal.

10
New cards

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

The standard burden of proof required in criminal cases.

11
New cards

Preponderance of the Evidence

The standard burden of proof that generally applies to civil cases, meaning the claim is more likely true than not.

12
New cards

Mala in Se

Acts considered inherently wrong, such as murder or robbery.

13
New cards

Mala Prohibitum

Acts prohibited mainly because a law or regulation forbids them, such as driving without a required license.

14
New cards

Felony

A serious criminal offense generally carrying potential imprisonment exceeding one year.

15
New cards

Misdemeanor

A minor criminal offense generally carrying a maximum potential imprisonment of one year or less.

16
New cards

Actus Reus

The prohibited act or legally relevant omission that forms part of an offense.

17
New cards

Mens Rea

The required mental state or culpability associated with an offense.

18
New cards

Concurrence

The requirement that the criminal act and the culpable mental state must coincide in the legally relevant way.

19
New cards

General Intent

The intent to perform the prohibited act, without necessarily intending a further specific result.

20
New cards

Transferred Intent

When the intent to harm one target is legally applied to the harm caused to another target, subject to the applicable law.

21
New cards

Constructive Intent

A context-dependent legal concept involving intent attributed by law (use your instructor's definition rather than assuming it means negligence or recklessness).

22
New cards

Criminology

The scientific study of crime, criminal behavior, and society's responses to crime.

23
New cards

Theoretical Imagination

The ability to connect individual behavior with wider social settings, institutions, history, and explanatory ideas.

24
New cards

Criminal Justice

The study of operational systems such as policing, courts, and corrections.

25
New cards

Theory

A logically connected set of ideas or propositions that explains relationships between concepts and helps account for a phenomenon.

26
New cards

Independent Variable

The proposed explanatory or predictor variable in a research study.

27
New cards

Dependent Variable

The outcome variable that the researcher seeks to explain.

28
New cards

Association

A statistical relationship in which two variables vary together; association alone does not prove causation.

29
New cards

Temporal Order

A condition for establishing causation requiring that the proposed cause must occur before the effect.

30
New cards

Nonspuriousness

A condition for establishing causation requiring that the relationship between two variables cannot be adequately explained by another variable.

31
New cards

Spurious Relationship

An apparent relationship between two variables that is explained by a third variable.

32
New cards

Unit of Analysis

The entity being analyzed, such as individuals, households, schools, neighborhoods, or cities.

33
New cards

Population

The entire group of units that the researcher wants to understand.

34
New cards

Sample

The subset of the population actually studied.

35
New cards

Aggregate Data

Data summarized across groups or places, such as neighborhood crime rates.

36
New cards

Ecological Fallacy

Incorrectly assuming that a group-level relationship also applies to individuals within those groups.

37
New cards

Cross-Sectional Survey Research

A research design that collects information from a sample at one point in time.

38
New cards

Longitudinal Cohort Research

A research design that follows a defined group over time and measures members at multiple points.

39
New cards

Attrition

The loss of participants from a study over time.

40
New cards

Experimental Research

A design that manipulates an independent variable and compares outcomes to test its effect.

41
New cards

Control Group

The group used for comparison in an experiment that does not receive the experimental intervention or receives the standard condition.

42
New cards

Random Assignment

Allocating participants to experimental conditions by chance to help balance preexisting differences.

43
New cards

Quantitative Research

Research using numerical measurements and statistical analysis to describe patterns or test hypotheses.

44
New cards

Qualitative Research

Research exploring meaning, experience, and context through interviews, observations, and text analysis.

45
New cards

Participant Observation

A qualitative method where the researcher joins or participates in the group or setting being studied.

46
New cards

Non-Participant Observation

A qualitative method where the researcher observes a setting without joining its activities.

47
New cards

Observer Effect

A phenomenon where people change their behavior because they know they are being observed.

48
New cards

Cesare Beccaria

A Classical School criminologist who argued that punishment should be proportionate, predictable, and prompt enough to deter crime, avoiding excessive cruelty while limiting arbitrary state power.

49
New cards

Utilitarianism

The doctrine that people tend to pursue pleasure and avoid pain, asserting that laws and punishments should discourage harmful behavior while promoting social welfare.

50
New cards

Rational Choice Theory

A criminological perspective proposing that people make decisions about crime by weighing perceived risks, rewards, and alternatives, though choices may be constrained by circumstances.

51
New cards

Bounded Rationality

Decision-making under limits of time, information, attention, and cognitive ability rather than perfect calculation.

52
New cards

Routine Activity Theory

A theory developed by Lawrence Cohen and Marcus Felson proposing that crime becomes more likely when a motivated offender, suitable target, and absence of capable guardians converge in time and space.

53
New cards

Criminal Opportunity

A situation in which circumstances make an offense possible or relatively easy.

54
New cards

Motivated Offender

A person willing and able to commit an offense.

55
New cards

Suitable Target

A person or object attractive and accessible to an offender because of factors such as value, visibility, access, or ease of removal.

56
New cards

Capable Guardian

A person or thing that discourages crime, such as a bystander, security camera, or lock.

57
New cards

General Deterrence

Preventing crime among the general public by making people aware of punishment imposed on others.

58
New cards

Specific Deterrence

Preventing a previously punished person from offending again.

59
New cards

Certainty of Punishment

The perceived likelihood that an offense will be detected and punished.

60
New cards

Severity of Punishment

How harsh the punishment is perceived to be.

61
New cards

Celerity of Punishment

How quickly punishment follows the commission of the offense.

62
New cards

Incapacitation

A crime control strategy that restricts a person's ability to offend in the community.

63
New cards

Social Process Theories

The perspective that criminal behavior is learned through social interactions, relationships, and experiences.

64
New cards

Social Structural Theories

Theories emphasizing broader societal arrangements such as inequality and neighborhood conditions.

65
New cards

Labeling Theory

A social-process theory arguing that society's reactions and labels can influence a person's identity and future behavior, potentially contributing to further deviance or crime.

66
New cards

Four Elements of Crime

A human act or omission, violation of criminal law, required culpability or guilty mental state, and punishment or sanction by the state (check lecture notes for the instructor's exact four elements).

67
New cards

Criminal Law vs. Tort Law

Criminal law concerns offenses prosecuted by the state and can result in punishment; tort law concerns civil wrongs, generally brought by injured parties, and often seeks compensation.

68
New cards

General Intent vs. Specific Intent

General intent generally involves intending the prohibited act, whereas specific intent requires an additional intended objective or result beyond the act itself.

69
New cards

Deviance Without Crime

Deviance violates social norms, but not every norm violation violates criminal law, as only certain behaviors are legally prohibited and penalized by the state.

70
New cards

Consensus, Conflict, and Interactionist Views of Law

  • Consensus View: Laws reflect shared social values.
  • Conflict View: Laws reflect competing interests and power differences.
  • Interactionist View: Social interactions and claims-making help determine which behaviors are labeled criminal.
71
New cards

Mala in Se vs. Mala Prohibitum

Mala in se refers to acts considered inherently wrong (such as murder or robbery), whereas mala prohibitum refers to acts prohibited mainly by statute or regulation.

72
New cards

Felonies vs. Misdemeanors

Felonies generally carry a possible sentence exceeding one year; misdemeanors generally carry a maximum sentence of one year or less (exact classifications depend on jurisdiction).

73
New cards

Major Goals of Criminology

To describe patterns of crime, explain why it occurs, predict when or where it may occur, and develop ways to prevent or reduce it.

74
New cards

Describing Crime

Identifying and measuring patterns of unlawful conduct, including its frequency, location, timing, and the characteristics of offenders and victims.

75
New cards

Explaining Crime

Identifying the underlying causes, processes, or conditions that produce criminal behavior.

76
New cards

Predicting Crime

Using known patterns or risk factors to estimate the likelihood of criminal behavior occurring under particular conditions.

77
New cards

Preventing Crime

Using empirical evidence and theoretical insights to reduce opportunities for unlawful conduct or address contributing factors.

78
New cards

Importance of Criminological Theory

Organizing observations, proposing explanations for crime, generating testable predictions, and guiding the development and evaluation of prevention strategies.

79
New cards

Theory vs. Fact

A fact is an empirical observation or established finding, whereas a theory accounts for how or why those observations occur.

80
New cards

Description vs. Explanation

Description documents what is occurring, whereas explanation attempts to identify why it is occurring.

81
New cards

Criminological Paradigm

A broad framework of assumptions and ideas that shapes how researchers understand crime and what they consider valid evidence.

82
New cards

Why Criminology Is Described as an Immature Discipline

It lacks a single universally accepted paradigm or unifying theory to explain all crime, leading to continuous debates over causes, methods, and interpretations.

83
New cards

Scope of Individual Criminological Theories

No single theory explains all criminal behavior; different theories account for distinct offenses, individuals, situations, or social conditions.

84
New cards

Why No Single Cause of Crime Exists

Crime is complex and varies across people, situational contexts, communities, and historical periods, involving multiple interacting factors.

85
New cards

Criminology vs. Criminal Justice

The former primarily studies crime, its causes, and social reactions, whereas the latter focuses directly on operational institutions and processes such as police, courts, and corrections.

86
New cards

Relationship Between Criminology and Criminal Justice

Criminological research informs criminal justice policies, while the practices of justice institutions provide data and subjects for criminological study.

87
New cards

Scope of Criminological Study

Beyond studying offenders, it examines victims, crime patterns, social conditions, laws, criminal justice institutions, and societal responses to crime.

88
New cards

Purpose of Studying Victimization

To identify populations at risk, understand how victimization occurs and affects individuals, and inform prevention strategies.

89
New cards

Purpose of Studying Society's Response to Crime

To analyze how laws, policing, punishment, rehabilitation, and public attitudes shape how crime is defined, detected, penalized, and prevented.

90
New cards

Scientific Theory Testing

Deriving specific predictions from a theory and comparing them against systematically collected empirical evidence.

91
New cards

Empirical Claim

An assertion that can be evaluated using systematic observations or concrete data rather than relying solely on opinion, tradition, or speculation.

92
New cards

Testability

The standard that a theory makes concrete claims that can be examined against observational evidence to be supported or challenged.

93
New cards

Falsifiability

The scientific principle that a hypothesis or claim must be capable of being contradicted or disproven by empirical evidence.

94
New cards

Provisional Nature of Scientific Evidence

Empirical evidence can support a theory without proving it absolute, leaving it open to revision or rejection if new data emerge.

95
New cards

Importance of Competing Explanations

A single observed pattern can have multiple explanations; evaluating alternative hypotheses clarifies which one is best supported by evidence.

96
New cards

Causal Explanation of Crime

An explanation proposing that a factor or process directly contributes to producing criminal behavior, rather than merely co-occurring with it.

97
New cards

Individual-Level Explanation of Crime

An approach focusing on the characteristics or experiences of individuals, such as decision-making, learning, self-control, or personal relationships.

98
New cards

Social-Level Explanation of Crime

An approach focusing on broader social conditions, such as inequality, neighborhood structure, cultural expectations, or institutional arrangements.

99
New cards

Situational Explanation of Crime

An approach focusing on immediate environmental circumstances that make an offense more or less likely, such as opportunity, target accessibility, or the presence of guardians.

100
New cards

Integration of Explanatory Levels

Broader social structures shape individual traits and life experiences, while immediate situational conditions determine whether an unlawful act takes place.