1/59
Looks like no tags are added yet.
ecological tolerance
also called fundamental niche, suite of abiotic and biotic conditions under which a species can survive, grow and reproduce
realized niche
exactly where the ideal ecological tolerance is located
geographic range
areas of world where a species lives
how do changing environmental conditions affect ecosystems?
they cause change in the distribution of species
what is an example of this?
as climate change increases, many species will move upward in latitude to adjust
some species are not as mobile, so they will die
mass extinction
when a large number of species goes extinct over a short period of time
sixth mass extinction
scientists believe we are experiencing a sixth global extinction with a rate of about 2 species per year
periodic disruption
occurs regularly
ex. day/night cycles
episodic disruption
occurs somewhat regularly
ex. rain patterns
random disruption
no regular occurrence
ex. tornado
resistance
measure of how much a disruption affects the energy and matter flows in an ecosystem
resillience
rate of which an ecosystem can return to original state after disruption
relationship between disruption duration and spatial extent of effects
direct
methods of measuring climate level of historic ages
looking at air bubbles in ice
looking at species of foraminifera in ocean sediment
method of measuring sea level throughout historic ages
fossils found in sediment
results of water level findings
during the Ice Age, there were large-scale sheets of ice and as those melted, water level increased
effect of large, rare disturbances
large habitat destruction
effects of intermediate level disturbances
intermediate disturbance hypothesis! these regions will have higher levels of species diversity
effects of seasonal disturbances
animal migration
island biogeography
study of how species are distributed + interacting on islands
species-area curve
as area of land increases, the number of species sustained increases
islands that are closer to continents . . .
have better species richness
islands with few species . . .
have a high rate of colonization
have a low rate of extinction
islands with many species . . .
have a low rate of colonization
have a high rate of extinction
larger islands have . . .
lower extinction rates because they can support larger populations
islands near to continents . . .
have a higher rate of colonization
have a higher rate of extinction
islands far from continents . . .
have a lower rate of colonization
have a lower rate of extinction
number of species ranking
large, near
large, far
small, near
small, far
rate of colonization ranking
small, near
small, far
large, near
large, far
rate of extinction ranking
small, near
small, far
large, near
large, far
artificial selection
breeding
natural selection
the environment determines which species survive and reproduce
Darwin’s rules for natural selection
variation in traits
traits are inherited
some traits provide advantage
who came up with natural selection?
Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace
fitness
the ability to survive and reproduce
adaptation
a trait acquired over time by individuals that improve fitness
mutation
a random variation in DNA that improves genetic variation
gene flow
process by which individuals move from one species to another to alter the genetic composition of both
bottleneck effect
the rapid reduction in population of a species leads to less genetic diversity
founder effect
if a few individuals are separated from their population, they will produce genetic variation based on their traits alone
reasons for extinction
condition change
endemic reasons
need for specific conditions to breed
need for specific food sources
small population
microevolution
evolution within a population
macroevolution
evolution that develops into a new family
allopatric speciation
a population is split off by a geological barrier
those two sections experience reproductive isolation
they become two different species
reproductive isolation
evolution so developed that interbreeding with the other species would not be possible
Bob Paine’s experiment
removed the starfish (highest predator) from a tide pool
Bob Paine’s results
the mussels overpopulated and destroyed the ecosystem
keystone species
a species that ha key influence on the strength of an ecosystem
Jim Estes experiment
observing kelp forests with and without the presence of otters
Jim Estes results
without the otters to eat sea urchins, the urchins overpopulated and ate the entire kelp forest
Jim Estes conclusion
keystone species affect both small and large aquatic ecosystems
Mary Power experiment
removing the large-mouthed bass from one side of the river
Mary Power results
The side without the bass was overpopulated by minnows and they ate everything
Mary Power conclusion
a keystone species’ effect can go beyond just population control
ex. in this case, the bass also provided a fear factor that makes the minnows too scared to eat so much and stay in one place
John Terbourgh experiment
he observed one of the Guri island with jaguars + army ants and one without
John Terbourgh results
without the jaguars and army ants, the other species overpopulated and ate all the vegetation
John Terbourgh conclusion
the keystone species theory also applies to terrestrial ecosystems
Tony Sinclair experiment
observed how the wildebeest population was increasing rapidly as a rebound after a disease outbreak and chose to leave them alone despite pleas from donors
Tony Sinclair results
eventually the wildebeest population plateaued, they also increased the tree population by preventing burning, which in turn allowed other species to flourish
Tony Sinclair conclusion
a species can be a keystone even if it is not a predator