1/29
30 cards based on your handwritten Midterm IR answer key, with topic context from poli270-my-practice.md. Study prompts and brief concept definitions were added where identifiable; these are not the original exam questions. Items 3, 9, 15, 23, 28, and 29 are marked REVIEW for missing or unclear context. Current-event answers are transcribed from your key, not independently verified.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What are the two broad research approaches named in the key?
Qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative research examines meanings and cases; quantitative research uses numerical measures. Key note: the original true/false statement is marked false because there are pros and cons to both.
What is an indivisible good?
A good that cannot be divided without destroying its value. Key example: money can be divided, but a $1 bill cannot be usefully split into pieces.
The key shows a question mark. Answer unresolved; consult the original question or class notes.
AfD — Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany). The practice document associates this item with German state elections; the specific election and date are not supplied.
The outcome that occurs if no agreement is reached; the alternative against which an actor evaluates a proposed deal.
Making a commitment that raises the cost of backing down, such as a public pledge that creates audience costs.
The absence of a central authority above states.
Ethiopia. This is the country recorded in the key for the Tigray item.
False. The note contrasts realism and constructivism, but the original statement is missing, so its theoretical classification cannot be reconstructed confidently.
Predominance or leadership by one especially powerful state in the international system.
An approach that uses state control of trade and economic activity to build national wealth and power.
Denmark and Greenland, according to the handwritten key. The specific agreement, date, and permissions require the original class question.
Westphalia. It is commonly associated in IR teaching with the development of the sovereign state system.
An actor’s willingness to bear costs to achieve its goals. Distinguish willingness from material capability.
“The question.” This entry does not identify a substantive answer without the original prompt.
Iran, according to the handwritten key. The speaker, date, and conditional threat are not provided.
Cooperation can create joint gains: both sides benefit, or one benefits while the other is no worse off. Bargaining concerns how benefits are divided; a larger share for one side can mean a smaller share for the other.
Deliberately increasing the risk of war to pressure the other side. The key describes moving closer to war and “raising risk.”
Nonexcludability and nonrivalry. The key gives international peace and security, and disease control (WHO), as examples.
The Houthi movement, according to the handwritten key. The specific assigned report and date are not supplied.
Actors share an interest in a collective benefit but have incentives to let others bear the costs, so the benefit may be underprovided.
An international system with several major centers of power.
False. The original true/false statement is missing; retrieve it before using this as a substantive study card.
Canada, according to the handwritten key. The original proposal, proposer, and date are not supplied.
Liberalism. As a study definition, it emphasizes how institutions, interdependence, and domestic actors can shape state behavior and cooperation. The original question is missing.
Negotiations backed by threats of force. The key links this to coercive diplomacy: compellence seeks an action or reversal (for example, withdraw troops), while deterrence seeks to prevent an action (for example, do not invade).
Realism. As a study definition, it emphasizes power, security, and state competition under anarchy. The original question is missing.
False. The original true/false statement is missing; retrieve it before using this as a substantive study card.
False. The original true/false statement is missing; retrieve it before using this as a substantive study card.
Your best choice depends on what you expect others to do, not just your own interests.