1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Inceptions
The initial short step to establish a common vision and basic scope for the project
Inception includes
analysis of perhaps 10% of the use cases, analysis of the critical non-functional requirements (quality attributes), creation of a business case, preparation of the development environment
Questions to explore
What is the vision and business case for this project?, Is it feasible?, Buy and/or build?, Rough estimate of cost?, Should we proceed or stop?
Do just enough investigation to
form a rational, justifiable opinion of the overall purpose and feasibility of the potential new system
Decide
if it’s worthwhile to invest in deeper exploration
Most requirements analysis occurs during
elaboration
Inception
Envision the product scope, vision, and business case.
Main problem solved
Do the stakeholders have basic agreement on the vision of the project, and is it worth investing in serious investigation?
Optional artifacts in Inception
Vision and business case, Use case model, Supplementary specification, Glossary, Risk list & risk management plan, Prototypes and proof of-concepts, Iteration plan, Phase plan & software development plan, Development case
Inception is
more than “a few” weeks long for most projects
There is an attempt to
define most of the requirements
Estimates or plans are expected to be
reliable
You define the architecture
this should be done iteratively in elaboration
You believe the proper sequence of work should be
define the requirements, design the architecture, implement
There is no
business case or vision artifact
All the use cases are
written in detail
None of the use cases are written in detail
10-20% should be written in detail to obtain some realistic insight into the scope of the problem
UML in Inception
not much diagramming is warranted, Simple UML use case diagrams may be useful, Most UML diagramming occurs in elaboration…
Managing the requirements is not
fully defining and stabilizing them before beginning design and coding
Manage requirements
are Given the reality of unclear, changing requirements (volatility)…
Managing requirements is
a systematic approach to finding, documenting, organizing, and tracking the changing requirements of a system.
The single largest contributing factor to failure
cited in 82% of projects as the number one problem (Thomas 2001), requirements definition is a cause of failure in nearly 80% of failed projects (Taylor 2000)
Any assumption that there will be little significant change to
requirements once they have been documented is fundamentally flawed.
45% of waterfall-style requirements were
never used (Johnson 2002), 19% were “rarely” used
FURPS+
requirement categories in the UP
FURPS+
functional, usability, reliability, performance, supportability + implementation, interface, operations, packaging, legal
functional
features, capabilities, security
Usability
human factors, help, documentation
Reliability
frequency of failure, recoverability, predictability
Performance
response times, throughput, accuracy, availability, resource usage
supportability
adaptability, maintainability, internationalization, configurability
implementation
resource limitations, languages and tools, hardware
interface
constraints imposed by interfacing with external systems
operations
system management in its operational setting
packaging
physical box
legal
licensing and so forth
quaility attributes
The “-ilities” of a system drive the architectural decisions…
In common use, requirements are categorized into
functional requirements (behavioral), non-functional requirements (everything else)
UP Requirements Artifacts
Use case model, supplementary specification, glossary, vision, business rules
Use case model
typical scenarios of using a system, primarily for functional requirements
supplementary specification
non-functional requirements, features not expressible as use cases
glossary
noteworthy terms, data dictionary
Vision
executive overview of the project’s big ideas
business rules
domain rules, transcend a single project