1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Why use correlation?
To test for systematic relationships between variables, variables which cannot be experimentally manipulated
Correlation
A relationship between two continuous variables
Why might it not be possible to experimentally manipulate a variable?
Ethical and logistical reasons
Correlation coefficient
single numerical value that describes a relationship
Two qualities of correlation
strengths and direction
Strength
0 -1; the closer to 1 the stronger the relationship
Negative correlation
-1 = as variable 1 goes up, variable 2 goes down
No correlation
0
Positive correlation
+1 as variable 1 goes up, variable 2 goes up
Boxplots
horizontal x axis typically represents the independent variable, vertical y axis typically represents the dependent variable
Pearson Product Moment Correlation (Pearson’s r)
Statistical test of significance that measures linear relationship between two variables (covariance)
Covariance
How much the variables change together, tells us the direction of the relationship
Positive covariance
As the value of one variable increases, so does the other
Negative covariance
As the value of one variable increases, the other decreases
Calculating variance of 1 variable (how much x varies around the mean)
Calculate the mean (x̅)
Subtract the mean from each score
Square the results
Add up the squared scores
Divide by the number of scores -1
Variance of two variables, x and y
For each pair of scores
Subtract the mean of the variable X from each score in X
Subtract the mean of variable Y from each score Y
Multiply each of the pairs difference scores together
Sum the results
Divide by the number of scores-1 (N-1)
why divide by N-1 (degrees of freedom)
Small samples tend to underestimate the underlying population covariance
For large samples the -1 has negligible effect on the estimate of the population covariance
Limitations of covariance
The covariance value is dependent on the measurement units of the variables, and doesn’t tell us the strength of the association
Standard deviation
A universal unit of measurement into which any other scale of measurement can be converted
Calculating standard deviation
The square root of its variance
Variance =
Calculate the mean (x̅)
Subtract the mean from each score
Square the results
Add up the squared scores
Divide by the number of scores -1
Pearson r correlation coefficient

Why r can take a maximum value of 1
the total shared variation represented by cov(x,y) can be as large as the total variation in the variables (SD), but no bigger. If the shared variation is smaller than the total variation, magnitude of r will be less than 1
When are correlations statistically significant
If p <.05 you can reject the null hypothesis, If you predicted the direction of correlation, then p value can be divided by 2 (one tailed test)
Reporting correlations
If significant, place more emphasis upon interpreting the direction and size (strength) of r
Limitations of Pearson’s r
only measures linear relationships, can find correlation not causation
Checking if data is normally distributed in SPSS
use Shapiro Wilk (<50) or Kolmogorov Smirnov (50+) in SPSS for each variable to check if data is skewed
When to us Spearman’s row
Data is not normally distributed, there are outliers, data is not continuous
Spearman’s rho
Converts data into ranks
Disadvantages of Spearman’s rho
Converting the data to ranks before analysis entails a loss of information, as you are probably reducing ratio-level data to ordinal data
Calculating Spearman’s rho
rank the data, do a Pearson’s r on the ranked data
Correlating 3 or more variables
Do a series of calculation to see how all variables are connected to each other, Correlation for each pair of variables calculated (separate bivariate correlations)
Parametric analysis
assume that the data follows a specific probability distribution (such as a normal or Gaussian distribution) and is defined by a fixed, finite number of parameters, such as the mean and standard deviation
Non-parametric analysis
make minimal or no strict assumptions about the underlying population distribution (often called "distribution-free"). Instead of modelling specific distribution parameters, they often analyse the rank-order or median of the data