Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination - Exam 2 (Ch. 5-6, 8) - Ball State | Luttrell

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/59

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

60 Terms

1
New cards

Prejudice

Attitudes toward people based solely on their group

2
New cards

Jim Crow Racism

The form of overt prejudice by the White majority against members of other racial groups, often embodied in law, that was the social norm in the United States prior to World War II

3
New cards

Contemporary Prejudice

-Bias that takes a more subtle form

-Not explicitly endorsing prejudice

4
New cards

Implicit Prejudice

Intergroup stereotypes and attitudes that are activated in memory when the person encounters a member of an outgroup without the person being aware that the activation has occurred

5
New cards

Explicit Prejudice

Intergroup attitudes and stereotypes that people intentionally retrieve from memory such as a memory

6
New cards

Symbolic Prejudice

Prejudice based on the perception that outgroup values threaten the values of one's ingroup; see also modern prejudice.

7
New cards

Old-Fashioned Prejudice

I hate minorities; they are biologically inferior; discrimination is justifiable

8
New cards

Modern-Symbolic Prejudice

I don't like minorities; they are morally inferior; discrimination no longer exists

9
New cards

Characteristics of Modern-Symbolic Prejudice

1. Racial prejudice and discrimination no longer exist

2. Racial economic differences = Lack of effort

3. Black people's anger over inequality is unjustified

4. Black people seek special favors

5. Black people getting more than they deserve

10
New cards

Aversive Prejudice

"I don't like discrimination, but don't like minorities either; they make me anxious"

11
New cards

Egalitarian Values

1. Equality of Opportunity

-Everyone deserves the same choice

2. Equality of Outcomes

-Everyone should have an equal share of successes

12
New cards

Ambivalent

I don't like discrimination; I have positive and negative beliefs about minorities

13
New cards

Which one would someone with modern-symbolic prejudice endorse?

Equality of Opportunity or Equality of Outcomes

Equality of Outcomes

14
New cards

Partner Discomfort Study

-Non-Black male participants

-Do a word-find task with partner

-Interact with White or Black confederate

Point 1: People with aversive prejudice are uncomfortable, anxious around minorities

Point 2: Over-compensate via increased reported liking

15
New cards

Response Amplification

More extreme behavior towards a stigmatized group

-More positive when good

-More negative when bad

16
New cards

Ambivalent Persuasion Study

-Measure ambivalence toward native people

-Receive persuasive information

•PRO-Native land grants

•ANTI-Native land grants

-Measure attitudes toward native people

Main Point: To reduce conflict, ambivalent people swing more extremely to one side or the other

17
New cards

Explicit Attitudes

The judgment we consciously make

18
New cards

Implicit Attitudes

The first judgment that comes to mind

19
New cards

Individual Differences

1. Ideology

2. Values

3. Self-Esteem

20
New cards

Ideology

Set of attitudes that predispose people to view the world in certain ways

21
New cards

Right-Wing Authoritarianism

A set of attitudes— authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression and conventionalism— that lead people to be prejudiced against groups that authority figures condemn and that are perceived to violate traditional values

22
New cards

German Hiring Study

-West Germans role-play as department head

-Measured RWA

-Receive a note from the company president:

•"Hiring East Germans would be a bad idea"

vs. control

-Do they recommend hiring an East German?

Main Point: People high in RWA engaged in sanctioned discrimination.

23
New cards

Social Dominance Orientation

An individual difference variable that reflects the extent to which one desires that one's ingroup dominate and be superior to outgroups

24
New cards

Fixed Pie Fallacy

•Resources are "zero sum"

•Someone's gain is someone else's loss

•Minority gain = majority loss

25
New cards

Legitimizing Myths

-Beliefs used to justify status quo, rationalizing

-E.g., Minority group members not in powerful positions

"They're lazy, unintelligent."

"African Americans are athletic; they make good athletes" ... not business leaders

26
New cards

Political Orientation

Running along a continuum from conservative to liberal and can be reflected in people's support of political parties that reflect their viewpoints

27
New cards

Values

Enduring beliefs about important goals we aspire to

28
New cards

Egalitarianism

-Value of equal opportunity, equal treatment, and concern for others' well-being

-A "brake" on prejudiced reactions

-Less prejudice

-Like non-specific "anti-prejudice"

-Not specific to any group

29
New cards

Value-Dissimilarity Hypothesis

Believing outgroup doesn't share ingroup'svalues → prejudice

30
New cards

Individualism

Value independence & work ethic

-Common in the U.S.

-Prejudice toward groups stereotyped as lazy

•African Americans

•Overweight people

31
New cards

Family Values

-Lesbians and gay men thought to violate these values

-Greater endorsement of "family values"

→ Greater prejudice against lesbians and gay

men

32
New cards

Attribution Value Model

-Prejudice depends on:

-1. Violation of Values

-2. Perceived responsibility for

violations

-"Controllable" → Prejudice

-"Uncontrollable" →Less/No Prejudice

33
New cards

Weight Responsibility Study

-Form impressions of an overweight woman

-Perceived Responsibility

-"Overweight due to a medical condition"

-"Overweight due to overeating"

-"Do you think you would like this person?"

-Medical Condition - Would Like

-Overeating - Wouldn't Like As Much

34
New cards

Self-Esteem

An evaluation of yourself

35
New cards

Secure High Self-Esteem

High Explicit Self-Esteem & High Implicit Self-Esteem

36
New cards

Defensive High Self-Esteem

High Explicit Self-Esteem & Low Implicit Self-Esteem

37
New cards

Social Identity Theory

Part of self-concept that comes from group membership

38
New cards

Self-Esteem Hypothesis

If group is good, you are good

39
New cards

Basking in Reflected Glory

Celebrating ingroup's victory like your own

40
New cards

Ingroup Favoritism

Viewing ingroup positively

41
New cards

Outgroup Derogation

Viewing outgroup negatively

42
New cards

Minimal Group Paradigm

Creating artificial and arbitrary ingroups/outgroups

43
New cards

Minimal Groups Study

-Divided into meaningless groups

-"Klee" people, "Kandinsky" people

-Distribute "money" to other participants

-Only given ID and group info

-Results: People favored own group

44
New cards

Minimal Groups & Kids

-5-yr-olds

-Pick redor blue coin (hidden)

-See other kids who picked red vs. blue

-Rate liking for each kid

-Split coins between two kids (red/blue)

Kids preferred other kids with samecolor shirt.

45
New cards

Determinants of Social Identity

Distinctiveness and ingroup threat

46
New cards

Distinctiveness

Seeming different highlights identity

47
New cards

Ingroup Threat

Threat to ingroup highlights identity

9/11 = Increase in importance of American Identity

48
New cards

Racial Shift Study

-400+ White Americans read press release

-Rate feelings toward racial groups

-Press Release:

-"People move residence more each year" or

"In a generation, ethnic minorities may be the

U.S. majority"

Confronting demographic change = More negative views of minorities

49
New cards

Realistic Conflict Theory

Prejudice comes from perceived competition for limited resources

50
New cards

Robbers Cave Study

22 boys split into two groups. One team vs the other in competitions to receive prize. Being in a competition with each other, both teams became more aggressive against the opposing team.

51
New cards

Implications for Immigrant Prejudice

•Job loss to immigrants →negative attitudes toward immigrants

•Poor economic conditions + large immigrant population = anti-immigrant attitudes

•High unemployment rates → immigration opposition

52
New cards

Perceived vs. Reality

-Perceived competition is sufficient

-Simply believing that resources are scarce→

-Prejudice toward Asian-Americans but

not African Americans

-Greater ingroup favoritism

53
New cards

Zero-Sum

-Competition → View Competition as Zero-Sum (like SDO!)

54
New cards

Ingroup Restriction

-Competition → Restrict Ingroup

55
New cards

Face Categorization Study

-Prime white students with scarcity or abundance

-Categorize racially ambiguous faces

-Abundance → 61% seen as White

-Scarcity → 52% seen as White

56
New cards

Relative Deprivation Theory

Not getting your share of the resources

57
New cards

Distributive Justice

Outcomes should be fairly distributed (merit-based)

58
New cards

Procedural Justice

The fairness of the process by which rewards are distributed

59
New cards

Personal Deprivation

-Feeling deprived as individual

-Unrelated to prejudice

60
New cards

Group Deprivation

-Feeling one's group is deprived

-Related to prejudice