1/32
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Cognitive Biases Def.
Systemic errors in thinking that affect judgement / decision-making
Cognitive Biases (+)
decision making/thinking is faster/more efficient
Cognitive Biases (-)
Can lead to (serious) errors in judgement
Confirmation Bias/Confirmation Hypothesis Testing Def.
tendency to seek out, interpret, and remember info that confirms our beliefs, and minimize, discount, or ignore info that dis-confirms our beliefs
E.g. Helps explain why our self-images are so stable
(self-verification theory)
Study Wason’s Rule Discovery Task
People do not proceed optimally in testing hypothesis
Rather than trying to falsify, people often try to confirm a hypothesis
Test: identify rule that applies to series of three numbers
What can Wason’s Rule Discovery Task lead to?
Influence how we gather info/prevent objectivity
Influence how we interpret and recall information
Influence decisions and lead to poor/faulty choices
Self-Fulfilling Prophecies/Beliefs Def.
belief that ends to its own fulfillment
a. process whereby one’s expectations about ourselves/others lead us to behave in ways that confirms those expectations
b. more complex and dynamic version of confirmation bias

Belief Perseverance Error def.
tendency to retain our beliefs despite facing evidence to the contrary
a. confirmation bias results in belief perseverance effect
Overconfidence Effect Def.
tendency to be more confident than correct
Overconfidence Effect Outcomes
a. overestimating the accuracy of one’s beliefs, predictions, ability and knowledge
b. mistaken judgements are typically recalled as times when one was ‘almost right’
c. Cognitive Bias leading to errors in prediction/judgement (vs. confident personality)
Dispositional/Internal Attributions
attributing behavior to traits, attitudes, and enduring internal states
Situational/External Attributions
attributing behavior to aspects of the environment, including other people
Why do we make attributions?
Accurate Attributions can simplify our world by helping us to:
Explain the causes of behavior and outcomes
Predict the future behavior of others
Respond to social situations in an appropriate way
How accurate is the Attribution Process?
Despite its basis in the desire to accurately explain, predict, and control the social world, the attribution process has some important biases
Fundamental Attribution Error (attribution only for other’s behavior) Def.
a. tendency to attribute behavior of others to dispositional factors
b. tendency to ignore situational determinants of other’s behavior
What is Joes & Harris (1967)
Participants assigned to read a short essay written by another person about Castro
a. Four Conditions
Pro/Anti Castro
Assigned vs. Chosen
What is the essay writer’s true attitude toward Castro?
Internal Attribution for behavior - Jones & Harris (1967)
Despite knowing the author’s choice of topic was eternally caused (no choice condition), people still assumed the content reflected the author’s true attitude toward Castro
What causes the Fundamental Attribution Effect Process?
may occur bc people tend to automatically make dispositional attributions then only use situational information to discount/correct their initial evaluation
a. correction more likely if contextual info is very compelling or salient
negative/unexpected
Cultural Differences in Fundamental Attribution Effect (MIiller 1984)
I. South Asians (India): explained behaviors in terms of social roles, obligations, and situational factors // focused on contextual factors
II. European American: explained behaviors in terms of dispositional traits // focused on individual attributes
Cultural Differences in Fundamental Attribution Effect (Choi & Nisbett (1998))
Participants either chose or were assigned a position on a topic (for/against)
I. American Participants: equally strong inferences about essay writer regardless of choice v. no choice condition
II. Korean Participants: much less extreme inferences when assigned to choice v. no choice condition
Actor Observer Bias (AOB) (attribution for own and other’s behavior)
a. tendency to attribute other’s behavior to dispositional factors
b. tendency to attribute own behavior to situational factors
Actor from AOB
attention focused on the situation, hence focus on situational factors
Observor AOB
attention focuses on the individual hence focus on dispositional factors
Self-Serving Attribution Bias
When we succeed: tendency to attribute our successes to internal traits and talents
When we fail: tendency to attribute our failures to external factors beyond our control
Self Serving Bias Example
Lau & Russell (1980)

Why does Self Serving Bias occur?
Helps protect our self-esteem
a. Attributing success to personal traits → provides us with boost in confidence (Self-Enhancing Bias for success)
b. Attributing failures to situational factors → helps absolve us from personal responsibility (Self-protecting bias for failure)
Hindsight Bias
a, tendency to believe, after learning an outcome, that one could have foreseen it all along
b. tendency to assume one knew all along that given outcome was likely
Hindsight Bias study (Choi & Nisbett (2000))
read story about seminary student who passed man that needed help → predict what happened → told student either helped/did not help, predict outcome and id they were successful
Hindsight Bias with American and Korean participants

False Consensus Effect
tendency to overestimate how much others agree with our beliefs, attitudes, values, and behavior
a. can lead people to overvalue the correctness of their own opinions
Availability Heuristic
when estimating commonality: tend to defer to examples that come to mind most easily/quickly
a. our opinions more accessible/salient
b. people we spend most time with have very similar beliefs and attitudes (family/friends)
Self Esteem
believing the majority of others are similar to use allows us to feel and maintain a positive self image
a. avoids feeling of deviancy
Ross et al. (1977)
